Counties / South Dakota / Buffalo County

Buffalo County, SD

FIPS 46017 · population 1,808 · outside every metro area

$118k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$118k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$540
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,204
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported value$118k
Surveyed gross rent$540
Rent burden 30%+41.3%
Median year built1976
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
12.1%vacant
578estimated housing units
Occupied tenure47.4% renter
owner 52.6%renter 47.4%
Structure mix68.7% single-family
Single-family 68.7%20+ units 1.6%Mobile home 21.8%Other 8.0%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs530▼ 1.5% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments26annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,029▲ 5.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health servicesn/a of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.5%WEEKLY WAGE+5.0%Education and health servicesn/a
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Buffalo County is a narrow diligence case: population 1,808; no Zillow county value series or FHFA HPI establishes price direction, and current asking rent is unpublished. The tension is positive mover flow against a thin, contracting workplace base: 2025 QCEW records 530 annual average covered jobs, down 1.49%. Investors who can obtain leases, insurance and comparable sales may investigate; those needing published yield, visible liquidity or buyer-depth evidence should be cautious.

02Housing economics

ACS supplies survey context, not current market pricing. Its owner-reported median value for owner-occupied homes is $117,800 and median gross rent for occupied units is $540; neither is a transaction or asking measure, and they are not matched property sets. HUD’s $1,204 two-bedroom Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not market asking rent. Because market rent is unpublished, gross yield cannot be computed or inferred from ACS rent or FMR. The 0.40% effective property-tax rate is a carrying-cost input; 12.11% ACS vacancy requires unit-level occupancy verification, not a demand conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Tax-return migration counts 30 households in and 21 out; inbound movers averaged $10,210 more AGI. This is a limited demand clue, not proof of tenant absorption or homebuying. The covered-worker average weekly wage was $1,029, up 5%, but QCEW measures workplace jobs, not resident employment or unemployment. Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Realtor.com metrics are unpublished, so MLS supply, seller concessions and marketing time cannot be assessed. Missing investor share and total purchases also prevent a conclusion on buyer competition.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the stated dominant hazard; modeled climate loss is 0.21% of building value per year, a model ratio rather than a property-specific insurance bill. The ACS median construction year is 1976, requiring inspection of drainage, elevation, condition and insurance availability. Next checks are asking rents and leases, comparable closed sales, assessments, flood-zone and policy terms, and property-level vacancy history. They determine whether migration can support cash flow after carrying and hazard costs.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Buffalo County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Fort Thompson CDP1.1KGann Valley CDP6
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

2 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Fort Thompson CDPCensus-designated place
    1,147
  2. 02
    Gann Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    6

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.208% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.40%

$473 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+9

30 in · 21 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$10,210

$32,067 arriving · $21,857 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investorsn/a

Purchase mix not published

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. ACS medians and HUD FMR could be mistaken for current investable rent-price economics.
  2. Workplace-job weakness could prove inconsistent with a durable renter or buyer base.
  3. Flood exposure and property-specific insurance costs can diverge from the modeled county-level loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and neither HUD FMR nor ACS gross rent can be substituted for market rent.

Does the record establish buyer competition?

No. Investor share, total purchases and Realtor.com listing-market metrics are not published.

What hazard measure is supplied?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled annual climate loss of 0.21% of building value.