Counties / Michigan / Crawford County

Crawford County, MI

FIPS 26039 · population 13,369 · outside every metro area

$180k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$180k
▲ 4.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$862
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,038
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+83.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.3%FHFA HPI2025+13.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$163k
Surveyed gross rent$862
Rent burden 30%+45.3%
Median year built1980
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
39.7%vacant
10,330estimated housing units
Occupied tenure20.4% renter
owner 79.6%renter 20.4%
Structure mix85.8% single-family
Single-family 85.8%20+ units 0.8%Mobile home 11.1%Other 2.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs4,062▼ 1.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments283annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,102▲ 9.9% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities25.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.0%WEEKLY WAGE+9.9%Trade, transportation, and utilities25.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Crawford County presents a price-momentum-versus-underwriting-evidence tension: buyers should investigate deal-level rent and flood costs, while those requiring demonstrated cash flow should be cautious. Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $179,615, up 4.33% year over year. FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 13.39%, with a cumulative five-year increase of 83.21%. That HPI corroborates positive transaction-price direction but is not a home value; its period and method cannot be merged with Zillow’s reading into one appreciation rate.

02Housing economics

Measured market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed from the home-value figure. HUD’s $1,038 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, and cannot replace market rent. The disclosed effective property-tax rate is 1.06%, and median annual property tax is $1,734; these frame a county tax burden but do not establish a particular property’s assessment or bill. Missing vacancy, insurance, repairs and utilities prevents an operating-margin conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Migration supplies a modest directional counterpoint: tax-return households showed net migration of 81, and incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by $9,341. That does not establish renter demand or household formation. Investor borrowers accounted for 9 of 160 purchase mortgages, a small reported non-owner-occupant presence that excludes unobserved all-cash activity. QCEW annual average covered employment at county workplaces fell 1.05%, while the covered-worker average weekly wage was $1,102. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.12% of building value expected lost per year; it is not a parcel-level loss estimate or an insurance quote. The record provides no Realtor.com listing-market figures, so visible MLS supply, marketing time and seller concessions cannot be assessed; listing evidence would still be asking-market rather than closed-sale evidence. Next checks are parcel flood history, insurance availability and quotes, rent comparables, lease-up evidence, condition, and the actual tax assessment. Those gaps prevent a defensible yield, resale-liquidity, and hazard-cost conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Crawford County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Grayling city1.7K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

1 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Grayling cityIncorporated place
    1,671

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.121% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.06%

$1,734 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+81

443 in · 362 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,341

$56,059 arriving · $46,718 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.6%

9 of 160 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished market rent and operating costs may leave property-level cash flow inconsistent with the county thesis.
  2. County-level flood-loss modeling may not reflect parcel exposure, insurance availability, or insurance costs.
  3. Mover and covered-job signals may not translate into demand for the target asset, while cash purchases are unobserved.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Measured market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used as market rent.

How much reported purchase-mortgage activity was investor activity?

Investor borrowers accounted for 9 of 160 purchase mortgages; the record does not capture unobserved all-cash purchases.

What hazard requires property-level diligence?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with a modeled county-level climate-loss ratio of 0.12% of building value per year.