Counties / South Dakota / Douglas County

Douglas County, SD

FIPS 46043 · population 2,828 · outside every metro area

$167k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$167k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$877
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$948
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported value$167k
Surveyed gross rent$877
Rent burden 30%+33.0%
Median year built1960
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
14.9%vacant
1,338estimated housing units
Occupied tenure23.3% renter
owner 76.7%renter 23.3%
Structure mix90.4% single-family
Single-family 90.4%20+ units 1.4%Mobile home 3.1%Other 5.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,050▲ 2.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments134annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$907▲ 3.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities32.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+2.1%WEEKLY WAGE+3.4%Trade, transportation, and utilities32.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Douglas County presents a thin-evidence underwriting problem rather than a clear pricing call: a small county of 2,828 residents has survey housing context but no published county market rent, Zillow value series, FHFA HPI, or Realtor.com listing measures. With 6 of 8 evidence groups available, investors considering income property should investigate unit-level rent and condition; buyers relying on appreciation, resale liquidity, or listing-market depth should be especially cautious. The thesis is that observable carrying costs and vacancy warrant discipline, while price discovery and rent coverage remain unmeasured.

02Housing economics

ACS survey results report an owner-reported median value of $166,900 for owner-occupied homes and $877 median gross rent for occupied units. These are different survey populations, neither current asking or transaction evidence, and cannot be combined into gross yield. HUD's $948 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market rent. The 0.99% effective property-tax rate and $1,653 median annual tax frame carrying costs, not a bill for a specific asset. A 14.95% ACS vacancy estimate adds occupancy risk, but is descriptive rather than a forecast.

03Demand & competition

At county workplaces, QCEW records 1,050 annual covered jobs, up 2.14%; this is workplace employment rather than resident employment and does not establish tenant demand. Supplied tax-return migration is a net loss of 5 households, although average AGI was $67,500 for arrivals versus $56,234 for departures; the income mix offsets neither the small count nor the population movement. Investor lending showed 0 non-occupant purchase mortgages among 21 purchases, limiting visible investor competition but providing a thin, mortgage-based measure rather than all-cash activity.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the stated dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss equals 0.11% of building value per year; this countywide model does not identify parcel-level flood exposure, insurance terms, or mitigation costs. Next checks should obtain current achieved and asking rents, lease turnover, operating expenses, tax assessments, flood-zone and insurance records, and active and closed comparables. Without those inputs, an underwriter cannot determine gross yield, resale liquidity, or whether vacancy reflects the target property type.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Douglas County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Corsica city699Armour city675Delmont city183New Holland CDP4Greenwood Colony CDP0Harrison CDP0
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

6 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Corsica cityIncorporated place
    699
  2. 02
    Armour cityIncorporated place
    675
  3. 03
    Delmont cityIncorporated place
    183
  4. 04
    New Holland CDPCensus-designated place
    4
  5. 05
    Greenwood Colony CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  6. 06
    Harrison CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.112% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.99%

$1,653 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-5

42 in · 47 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$11,266

$67,500 arriving · $56,234 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors0.0%

0 of 21 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Current rents or sale and listing comparables could differ materially from the ACS context, changing the property economics.
  2. Countywide flood-loss modeling may miss property-specific flood exposure, insurance costs, and mitigation needs.
  3. Migration and investor observations are small or mortgage-limited samples and may not represent broader demand or competition.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be computed from the supplied record?

No. County market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be substituted for market rent.

What investor purchase-mortgage activity is recorded?

The record shows 0 non-occupant purchase mortgages among 21 purchases.

What hazard is identified and what climate-loss measure is supplied?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled annual climate loss of 0.11% of building value.