Counties / Michigan / Emmet County

Emmet County, MI

FIPS 26047 · population 34,125 · outside every metro area

$451k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$451k
▲ 9.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$1,112
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,235
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+74.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+9.4%FHFA HPI2025+3.9%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$316k
Surveyed gross rent$1,112
Rent burden 30%+44.2%
Median year built1985
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
30.9%vacant
21,979estimated housing units
Occupied tenure23.0% renter
owner 77.0%renter 23.0%
Structure mix76.9% single-family
Single-family 76.9%20+ units 4.0%Mobile home 5.5%Other 13.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs17,860▲ 0.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,620annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,128▲ 5.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities22.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.7%WEEKLY WAGE+5.8%Trade, transportation, and utilities22.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Emmet County presents a valuation-versus-income test: Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value is $451,194 after a 9.4% year-over-year increase, while the FHFA repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.86% in its separate 2025 annual observation. Both indicate upward direction, but they are not interchangeable: the HPI is an index rather than a home value, and their periods and methods cannot form one appreciation rate. Rent-led diligence is central for buyers; income-focused underwriting should remain cautious until property-level revenues and expenses are obtained.

02Housing economics

Measured market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $1,235 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot substitute for rent. Carrying-cost review starts with the 0.83% effective property-tax rate. County-level figures do not establish insurance, maintenance, vacancy, or financing costs, so neither tax burden nor FMR resolves the income case for a specific home.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com listing-market evidence shows active MLS listings up 34% year over year, with 14.46% of listings price-reduced. These are asking-market supply and seller-concession signals, not closed sales or proof of buyer demand. Annual QCEW covered employment at county workplaces rose 0.67%, while average covered-worker weekly wage grew 5.82%; neither is resident employment or a forecast. Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Reported net in-migration of tax-return households paired with a $26,358 incoming-over-outgoing average AGI gap. Non-occupant investors made 25 of 323 purchase mortgages, or 7.74%, a present but limited buyer cohort.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits remain material. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual building-value loss is 0.08%; that county-level model is not a parcel flood determination or an insurance quote. The record lacks market asking rent, closed-sale prices, vacancy, operating expenses, insurance, debt terms, property condition, and parcel flood-zone details. Those absences prevent yield, net-cash-flow, sales-comparison, and site-specific hazard conclusions. Next checks are leases and rent comps, tax and insurance bills, flood maps and elevation, closed transactions, and property-level expense history.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Emmet County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Petoskey city5.9KHarbor Springs city1.1KAlanson village834Mackinaw City village*778Pellston village755Bay Shore CDP*697Carp Lake CDP380Conway CDP237
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

14 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Petoskey cityIncorporated place
    5,856
  2. 02
    Harbor Springs cityIncorporated place
    1,086
  3. 03
    Alanson villageIncorporated place
    834
  4. 04
    Mackinaw City villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    778
  5. 05
    Pellston villageIncorporated place
    755
  6. 06
    Bay Shore CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    697
  7. 07
    Carp Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    380
  8. 08
    Conway CDPCensus-designated place
    237
  9. 09
    Brutus CDPCensus-designated place
    198
  10. 10
    Bay View CDPCensus-designated place
    164
  11. 11
    Oden CDPCensus-designated place
    150
  12. 12
    Levering CDPCensus-designated place
    73
Show 2 more places
  1. 13
    Ponshewaing CDPCensus-designated place
    61
  2. 14
    Cross Village CDPCensus-designated place
    47

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.077% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.83%

$2,634 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+35

1,053 in · 1,018 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$26,358

$105,170 arriving · $78,812 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.7%

25 of 323 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings333▲ 34.0% year over year
Median days on market44▲ 12.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced14.5%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 6.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual market rent and operating costs could leave gross yield and cash flow inconsistent with the current home-value level.
  2. MLS supply and concession indicators may not match closed-sale values or a target property’s marketing outcome.
  3. Parcel-specific inland-flood exposure, insurability, and loss severity may differ from the county model.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used as market asking rent.

Does the record show investor purchase activity?

Yes. It reports purchase mortgages to non-occupants, but does not identify property types, bid terms, or winning prices.

Which hazard needs parcel-level diligence?

Inland flood. The county climate model does not establish a property's flood zone, insurance availability, or expected loss.