Counties / South Dakota / Lyman County

Lyman County, SD

FIPS 46085 · population 3,724 · outside every metro area

$166k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$166k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$651
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$940
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported value$166k
Surveyed gross rent$651
Rent burden 30%+24.3%
Median year built1976
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
23.5%vacant
1,553estimated housing units
Occupied tenure30.0% renter
owner 70.0%renter 30.0%
Structure mix81.7% single-family
Single-family 81.7%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 10.8%Other 7.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,346▼ 1.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments142annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$776▲ 7.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities39.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.7%WEEKLY WAGE+7.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities39.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lyman County is a cautious, evidence-thin rental screen: in 2025, covered workplace employment declined 1.68% while average weekly covered-worker pay rose 7.03%. Operators able to verify tenant sources and property costs should investigate; buyers needing demonstrated market depth should be cautious. As the largest disclosed private supersector, trade, transportation, and utilities accounts for 39.63% of private covered employment, making employer exposure a material diligence item. QCEW measures annual covered jobs at county workplaces, not resident employment, unemployment or a forecast.

02Housing economics

Gross yield cannot be calculated because current market rent is not published. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $940 monthly, but it is a payment standard, not asking rent. The ACS 2024 5-year survey reports a $165,800 owner-reported median value for owner-occupied homes and $651 median gross rent for occupied units. These survey measures cover different housing sets, are not current market prices or rents, and must not be combined into yield. The effective property-tax rate is 0.91%, with median annual tax of $1,506; verify the parcel bill. The 23.50% ACS vacancy rate flags leasing risk, not current available supply.

03Demand & competition

Migration records show a net loss of 14 tax-return households. Arrivals had a stated $6,147 average AGI advantage over departures; it shows mover composition, not renter demand or population change. Investor-linked purchase mortgages were 1 of 15 purchases, or 6.67%: limited observed participation, but too small to characterize buyer competition. Realtor.com’s active-inventory source is 2026-06 but publishes no figure; listing price, days on market and price-reduction fields are also absent, preventing assessment of visible asking prices, supply and seller concessions.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected building-value loss is 0.27% annually. This is neither an insurance quote nor dollar loss, but makes flood zone, elevation, prior loss, coverage and deductibles key checks. Zillow county value and FHFA repeat-transaction HPI observations are absent, so current value direction and appreciation cannot be established; neither method can substitute for the other. Obtain address-level flood and insurance data, lease and concession comps, utility responsibility, parcel tax history, condition and closed-sale evidence. These resolve whether carrying costs and vacancy translate to the property.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Lyman County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Lower Brule CDP743Oacoma town548West Brule CDP471Presho city313Kennebec town296Reliance town211Vivian CDP50
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Lower Brule CDPCensus-designated place
    743
  2. 02
    Oacoma townIncorporated place
    548
  3. 03
    West Brule CDPCensus-designated place
    471
  4. 04
    Presho cityIncorporated place
    313
  5. 05
    Kennebec townIncorporated place
    296
  6. 06
    Reliance townIncorporated place
    211
  7. 07
    Vivian CDPCensus-designated place
    50

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.274% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.91%

$1,506 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-14

60 in · 74 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$6,147

$45,417 arriving · $39,270 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.7%

1 of 15 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Workplace employment may not reflect the income, location or employment stability of likely tenants.
  2. Countywide ACS vacancy and rent context may not represent a target property's current submarket or condition.
  3. Small mover and investor-purchase counts may not represent ongoing tenant demand or buyer competition.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Current market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot substitute for market rent.

Does the record establish current sales pricing or appreciation?

No. Zillow county value and FHFA repeat-transaction HPI observations are absent, and Realtor.com listing-market figures are not published.

Which hazard requires priority diligence?

Inland flood; verify the specific property's flood exposure, prior losses, insurance coverage and deductible.