Counties / South Dakota / McPherson County

McPherson County, SD

FIPS 46089 · population 2,145 · outside every metro area

$86k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$86k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$594
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$929
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported value$86k
Surveyed gross rent$594
Rent burden 30%+24.1%
Median year built1962
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
24.1%vacant
1,205estimated housing units
Occupied tenure18.7% renter
owner 81.3%renter 18.7%
Structure mix86.5% single-family
Single-family 86.5%20+ units 1.6%Mobile home 5.6%Other 6.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs554▼ 1.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments95annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$854▲ 6.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services28.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.1%WEEKLY WAGE+6.2%Education and health services28.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

McPherson County poses a carrying-cost-versus-demand question: its survey housing stock shows a 24.07% vacancy rate, while the 2025 QCEW annual average records 554 covered jobs at county workplaces, down 1.07% year over year. Cautious income investors should require unit-level occupancy and replacement-demand verification, not broad-momentum assumptions. Average covered-worker pay was $854 weekly; Education and health services, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounted for 28.61% of private covered employment. These workplace measures do not describe residents, unemployment, or a forecast.

02Housing economics

Housing economics are not yet investable from published rent data. The ACS 2024 5-year survey puts owner-reported median owner-occupied value at $85,600 and surveyed gross rent for occupied rental units at $594; they cover different housing populations and are neither current transaction nor asking measures, nor inputs to gross yield. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $929 monthly, but it is a payment standard rather than market asking rent. The effective tax rate is 1.55%, a carrying-cost input requiring parcel confirmation.

03Demand & competition

Demand and competition are thinly evidenced. The record shows a net loss of five tax-return households, while in-movers averaged $20,734 less AGI than out-movers; this is mover-income evidence, not a measure of all households. Investor mortgages comprised 16.67% of six purchases, so participation exists but the purchase base is too small to characterize durable competition. Realtor.com MLS listing price, active listings, marketing time, reductions, and pending ratio are not published, preventing an assessment of visible supply, seller concessions, or buyer absorption.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits remain material. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual climate loss equals 0.12% of building value; this model is not a site flood determination. No Zillow county home-value series or FHFA annual HPI is supplied, so price direction cannot be tested by either a valuation series or repeat-transaction index. Missing current market rent, property-level insurance and flood-zone data, condition, lease roll, and MLS listings prevent a defensible yield, hazard-cost, or exit-liquidity conclusion. Next checks are rent comps and concessions, occupancy and turnover by property, tax and insurance quotes, and flood mapping.

Cities & communities

Where people live within McPherson County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Eureka city778Leola city381Spring Creek Colony CDP209Grassland Colony CDP15Long Lake town14Wetonka town7Hillsview town0Long Lake Colony CDP0
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

8 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Eureka cityIncorporated place
    778
  2. 02
    Leola cityIncorporated place
    381
  3. 03
    Spring Creek Colony CDPCensus-designated place
    209
  4. 04
    Grassland Colony CDPCensus-designated place
    15
  5. 05
    Long Lake townIncorporated place
    14
  6. 06
    Wetonka townIncorporated place
    7
  7. 07
    Hillsview townIncorporated place
    0
  8. 08
    Long Lake Colony CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.116% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.55%

$1,323 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-5

23 in · 28 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$20,734

$51,087 arriving · $71,821 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors16.7%

1 of 6 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Published market rent may not support operating and carrying costs because market rent is unavailable.
  2. Survey vacancy may reflect weak unit-level absorption rather than readily rentable available supply.
  3. Inland flood exposure and unobserved property condition may create costs beyond the county climate-loss model.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and the $929 HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than asking rent.

What is the observable employment trend?

QCEW reports 554 annual average covered jobs at county workplaces in 2025, down 1.07% from the prior annual average.

How strong is observable investor buyer competition?

Investor mortgages represented 16.67% of six purchases, which shows participation but leaves too small a base to characterize durable competition.