Counties / Michigan / Newaygo County

Newaygo County, MI

FIPS 26123 · population 50,792 · outside every metro area

$261k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$261k
▲ 7.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$904
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$976
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+61.4%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+7.8%FHFA HPI2025+4.9%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$187k
Surveyed gross rent$904
Rent burden 30%+44.7%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
21.2%vacant
24,931estimated housing units
Occupied tenure13.5% renter
owner 86.5%renter 13.5%
Structure mix76.1% single-family
Single-family 76.1%20+ units 1.1%Mobile home 19.1%Other 3.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs11,796▼ 0.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments901annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$973▲ 2.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities22.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.9%WEEKLY WAGE+2.5%Trade, transportation, and utilities22.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Newaygo County presents a price-momentum-versus-rental-support tension, rather than a simple appreciation case. Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $260,907, up 7.85% year over year. Separately, FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 4.94% annually; it confirms positive index movement but is neither a dollar home value nor the same observation period. This county merits investigation by operators able to validate leases and expenses, while underwriting dependent on resale or assumed rent warrants caution.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unpriced for rental underwriting because no county market asking rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s FMR is $976 per month, but it is a payment standard rather than a market-rent estimate and cannot fill that gap. Against the stated entry basis, the 1.10% effective property-tax rate is a carrying-cost input, not a complete expense budget. In Realtor.com’s MLS listing-market observation, 105 active listings were down 23.64% year over year and 22.79% had price reductions. These describe visible asking supply and seller concessions, not closed prices or buyer demand by themselves.

03Demand & competition

Demand and buyer competition are uneven. Tax-return migration was positive, and incoming movers’ average income exceeded outgoing movers’ by $10,901; those records describe movers, not tenant absorption. Investor mortgages numbered 8 among 547 total purchases, a limited observed investor presence that does not capture cash buyers. QCEW recorded 11,796 annual-average covered jobs at county workplaces, down 0.88%. Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector. This is covered workplace employment, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled climate loss ratio is 0.09% of building value expected to be lost annually; it is not a property-specific loss estimate. The record does not publish vacancy, lease renewals, insurance quotes, flood-zone or elevation history, repair needs, or closed-sale comparables. Those omissions prevent defensible net-cash-flow, property-specific flood-cost, and exit-price conclusions. Next checks are market lease comparables, tax and insurance bills, flood records, condition, and transaction comps.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Newaygo County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Fremont city4.6KNewaygo city2.5KWhite Cloud city1.3KGrant city1.1KHesperia village*934
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

5 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Fremont cityIncorporated place
    4,568
  2. 02
    Newaygo cityIncorporated place
    2,512
  3. 03
    White Cloud cityIncorporated place
    1,280
  4. 04
    Grant cityIncorporated place
    1,096
  5. 05
    Hesperia villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    934

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.093% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.10%

$2,055 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+71

1,371 in · 1,300 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$10,901

$55,992 arriving · $45,091 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors1.5%

8 of 547 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings105▼ 23.6% year over year
Median days on market38▼ 10.6% year over year
Listings price-reduced22.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 1.4% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual achievable rent and vacancy may not support the observed price basis or operating costs.
  2. Annual covered-job contraction may coincide with weaker local leasing depth.
  3. Property-specific flood exposure, insurance, condition, and tax bills may differ from county-level indicators.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. County market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be substituted for market rent.

What does the record show about investor buyer competition?

Observed investor mortgages are limited relative to total purchases, but the record does not state how cash buyers are classified.

What environmental cost conclusion is supported?

Only a county-level modeled climate-loss ratio tied to inland flood is provided; property-specific loss and insurance cost are not published.