Counties / Illinois / Schuyler County

Schuyler County, IL

FIPS 17169 · population 6,787 · outside every metro area

$154k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$154k
▲ 3.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$853
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$916
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+43.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+3.5%FHFA HPI2025+16.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$110k
Surveyed gross rent$853
Rent burden 30%+34.0%
Median year built1971
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
17.3%vacant
3,306estimated housing units
Occupied tenure20.6% renter
owner 79.4%renter 20.6%
Structure mix81.5% single-family
Single-family 81.5%20+ units 0.2%Mobile home 10.6%Other 7.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,715▲ 0.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments165annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,038▲ 3.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities29.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.0%WEEKLY WAGE+3.7%Trade, transportation, and utilities29.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Schuyler County’s decision tension is a reported appreciation signal against unmeasured rental income and inland-flood exposure. Buyers able to verify parcel rents and flood conditions should investigate; those needing broad market confirmation should be cautious. Zillow’s county median home value was $153,673 in 2026-06, while FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 16.06% on its annual measure. The HPI is an appreciation index, not a home value, and its annual label and method do not match Zillow’s 2026-06 observation; the measures cannot be averaged into one growth rate.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unproven. No median asking market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed from the supplied record. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not evidence of asking rent or a yield substitute. Carrying costs matter against the reported value: the effective property-tax rate is 1.78%, and median annual tax is $1,950. Lease comparables, achieved rents, owner-paid utilities, turnover costs and tax assessments are needed before acquisition price can be compared with operating income.

03Demand & competition

Listing evidence indicates a small, mixed negotiation environment rather than demonstrated buyer demand. Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS snapshot had 13 active listings, up 44.44% year over year; 36.11% of listings had price reductions and the pending-to-active ratio was 23.08%. These are visible-supply, asking-price, concession and marketing measures, not closed sales. Investors represented 14.63% of 41 purchase mortgages, showing non-owner participation but not its pricing power. QCEW annual covered workplace employment was flat; it is not resident employment, unemployment or a labor forecast.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual climate loss equals 0.15% of building value; this is modeled risk rather than a property insurance quote. Net migration was positive by 12 tax-return households, but average income of movers entering was $3,543 below that of movers leaving, limiting what the net count says about renter purchasing power. The record does not publish vacancy, lease, closed-sale, insurance, flood-zone, property-condition or financing evidence. Those gaps prevent net cash-flow, resale-comparable and parcel-level hazard conclusions.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Schuyler County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Rushville city2.7KLittleton village105Browning village99Camden village57
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

4 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Rushville cityIncorporated place
    2,747
  2. 02
    Littleton villageIncorporated place
    105
  3. 03
    Browning villageIncorporated place
    99
  4. 04
    Camden villageIncorporated place
    57

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.146% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.78%

$1,950 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+12

127 in · 115 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$3,543

$43,535 arriving · $47,078 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors14.6%

6 of 41 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings13▲ 44.4% year over year
Median days on market49▼ 23.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced36.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 23.2% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Achievable market rents may not support acquisition price and carrying costs.
  2. Flood insurance, mitigation costs or parcel exposure may exceed the county-level modeled risk.
  3. Sparse MLS inventory may make listing supply and concession signals unrepresentative.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

What county housing value is reported?

Zillow reports a $153,673 county median home value in 2026-06; it is not a closed-sale price.

Can gross rental yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent cannot be substituted for market rent.

How much investor buying is observed?

Investors accounted for 14.63% of 41 purchase mortgages; the record does not show their bids or pricing influence.