Counties / South Dakota / Tripp County

Tripp County, SD

FIPS 46123 · population 5,611 · outside every metro area

$204k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$204k
▲ 4.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$820
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$929
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulative+48.0%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.9%FHFA HPI2025n/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$133k
Surveyed gross rent$820
Rent burden 30%+57.3%
Median year built1969
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
18.3%vacant
2,762estimated housing units
Occupied tenure31.6% renter
owner 68.4%renter 31.6%
Structure mix77.7% single-family
Single-family 77.7%20+ units 2.9%Mobile home 11.6%Other 7.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,329▼ 0.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments264annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$992▲ 4.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities28.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.1%WEEKLY WAGE+4.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities28.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Tripp County presents a price-strength-versus-underwriting-depth tension. Zillow’s county median home value was $203,905 in 2026-06, up 4.94% year over year, while FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI was 48.03% higher over five years. Those measures point in the same direction but are not one growth series: Zillow is a home-value observation at one vintage, whereas FHFA is an index, not a home value. Underwriters should investigate where property economics can be verified and be cautious where demonstrated rental cash flow or resale depth is required.

02Housing economics

Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD FMR of $929 per month is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot fill that gap. Against the Zillow value, the effective property-tax rate is 0.95%; it is a carrying-cost input, but property-specific taxes, insurance, repairs, financing, and utilities are not published. Price appreciation therefore cannot be translated into net operating economics.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS listing-market evidence shows 16 active listings and an 88-day median marketing time; active listings are visible supply and days on market measure marketing time, not closed-sale pricing or buyer demand. Its 0% price-reduced share records no listed seller concessions, but does not prove demand. Tax-return migration was negative, although inbound moving households averaged $18,618 more AGI than outbound movers. No investor purchases were recorded among 11 purchase mortgages; that limited sample documents little investor competition, not the depth of broader buyer participation.

04Risk & next checks

Modeled annual building-value loss is 0.16%, with inland flood the dominant hazard; this is not a property-specific damage estimate. Annual QCEW workplace data show 2,329 covered jobs, with Trade, transportation, and utilities at 28.81% of private covered employment. QCEW is not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast, and this supersector is not the whole economy. Next checks are market rents and leases, parcel taxes, insurance and flood exposure, plus sale and pending comparables. Without them, yield, flood-cost, and exit-liquidity conclusions remain unavailable.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Tripp County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Winner city2.9KColome city338New Witten town76Ideal CDP40Hamill CDP0
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

5 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Winner cityIncorporated place
    2,905
  2. 02
    Colome cityIncorporated place
    338
  3. 03
    New Witten townIncorporated place
    76
  4. 04
    Ideal CDPCensus-designated place
    40
  5. 05
    Hamill CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.161% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.95%

$1,262 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-6

90 in · 96 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$18,618

$60,233 arriving · $41,615 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors0.0%

0 of 11 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings16▼ 20.5% year over year
Median days on market88▼ 8.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced0.0%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 4.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished market rent and operating costs could materially change cash-flow economics.
  2. Thin MLS and mortgage observations may not represent buyer competition or resale liquidity.
  3. County-level flood-loss modeling may differ materially from parcel-level flood exposure and insurance costs.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

What does the MLS evidence show about visible supply and marketing time?

Realtor.com reports 16 active listings and an 88-day median days on market; these are listing-market measures, not closed-sale evidence.

What climate hazard is identified?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled annual building-value loss of 0.16%.