Counties / South Dakota / Ziebach County

Ziebach County, SD

FIPS 46137 · population 2,377 · outside every metro area

$100k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$100k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$734
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$929
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported value$100k
Surveyed gross rent$734
Rent burden 30%+46.2%
Median year built1987
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
17.0%vacant
885estimated housing units
Occupied tenure42.9% renter
owner 57.1%renter 42.9%
Structure mix68.4% single-family
Single-family 68.4%20+ units 2.0%Mobile home 17.8%Other 11.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs251▼ 0.4% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments30annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$912▼ 9.3% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorFinancial activities15.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.4%WEEKLY WAGE−9.3%Financial activities15.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Ziebach County poses an underwriting tension: survey housing benchmarks exist, but evidence needed to translate them into income, liquidity, and price direction does not. Cash-flow buyers and exit-sensitive buyers should be cautious: market rent, current listing conditions, and price-trend series are not published. No Zillow county observation or FHFA annual observation is supplied, so neither a current home-value measure nor a repeat-transaction appreciation check is available.

02Housing economics

The ACS 2024 5-year survey reports an owner-reported median value of $99,600 for owner-occupied homes and a surveyed median gross rent of $734 for occupied rental units. They cover different housing populations and are neither current asking measures nor transaction prices; they must not be combined into a yield. Because market rent is not published, gross yield cannot be computed. HUD's two-bedroom FMR of $929 is a payment standard, not market rent. The survey’s 16.95% vacancy rate is descriptive rather than a lease-up forecast, while the effective property-tax rate of 0.62% is a carrying-cost input.

03Demand & competition

QCEW 2025 reports 251 annual-average covered jobs located in the county, down 0.40% from its prior annual average. Its covered-worker average weekly wage was $912, down 9.25%. Financial activities is the largest disclosed private supersector, but that label does not describe the whole county economy. These are workplace jobs rather than resident employment or a demand forecast. Migration data show 30 moved-out tax-return households with average AGI of $35,800; without moved-in households, net migration and a mover-income comparison cannot be established. Investor share, purchase totals, and Realtor.com listing measures are not published, leaving buyer competition and visible supply untested.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled annual expected building-value loss ratio is 0.18%. This is a county-level model, not an observed property loss or parcel-specific insurance cost. Underwriting next checks are local leased and asking rents, operating expenses, closed-sale and listing history, and parcel flood exposure plus insurance terms. Those gaps prevent a defensible cash-flow calculation and a liquidity or appreciation conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Ziebach County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Eagle Butte city*1.5KDupree city557Cherry Creek CDP224Bridger CDP66
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

4 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Eagle Butte cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,458
  2. 02
    Dupree cityIncorporated place
    557
  3. 03
    Cherry Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    224
  4. 04
    Bridger CDPCensus-designated place
    66

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.181% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.61%

$613 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migrationn/a

Household flow not published

Arriving vs leaving incomen/a

Income flow not published

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investorsn/a

Purchase mix not published

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. A target property's achieved rent and operating costs may diverge from ACS survey figures, leaving cash flow untested.
  2. Absent listing, closed-sale, and investor-purchase evidence, resale liquidity and buyer competition may differ from the cautious county framing.
  3. Inland-flood exposure and property-specific insurance costs may differ materially from the county-level climate model.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

Is a current price-appreciation measure available?

No. The record supplies neither a Zillow county home-value observation nor an FHFA annual repeat-transaction index observation.

What buyer-competition evidence is available?

No investor share, purchase total, or Realtor.com listing-market metrics are published.