When asking-rent growth and home-value growth diverge
Which US rental markets saw Zillow asking rent move materially faster or slower than Zillow home values over the latest exact five-year window?
Rent and home values can pull in different directions even inside the same market. This study holds the month endpoints constant, publishes both direct Zillow series and keeps their growth gap separate from yield.
- Markets compared
- 319 four direct same-month endpoints
- Rent ahead
- 191 gap above two percentage points
- Home values ahead
- 63 gap below minus two points
- Median growth gap
- 4.4% rent change minus home-value change
The direction of the gap matters more than a single growth headline
The exact five-year intersection contains 319 current market areas from 2021-06 to 2026-06. Median Zillow asking rent changed 30.0%, while median Zillow home value changed 26.4%. Their median rent-minus-value gap is 4.4%.
Abilene, TX has the largest rent-ahead gap at 61.3%: asking rent changed 87.0% while home values changed 25.6%. That divergence can affect the direction of a gross-yield screen, but it does not contain operating expenses or a property acquisition price.
ZORI and ZHVI are two market indexes, not a matched set of properties. A growth gap is not appreciation, net return or evidence that the same unit produced both endpoints.
At the other end, McAllen, TX records a -14.1% gap, with rent changing 16.6% and home values changing 30.7%. Open the interactive history explorer to inspect the monthly path and exact dollar endpoints before moving to supply, jobs and property-level underwriting.
Five-year asking-rent change versus home-value change
Above the diagonal, Zillow asking rent changed faster; below it, Zillow home values changed faster.
The first 24 rows, with a path to the underlying market
| Gap rank | Market | Rent start | Rent end | Rent change | Home value start | Home value end | Value change | Gap | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abilene, TX2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,035 | $1,935 | 87.0% | $175k | $220k | 25.6% | 61.3% | Open history |
| 2 | Johnstown, PA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $633 | $863 | 36.4% | $133k | $121k | -9.2% | 45.5% | Open history |
| 3 | Williston, ND2021-06 → 2026-06 | $838 | $1,256 | 50.0% | $314k | $356k | 13.3% | 36.7% | Open history |
| 4 | New Orleans, LA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,350 | $1,617 | 19.8% | $277k | $265k | -4.5% | 24.3% | Open history |
| 5 | Sumter, SC2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,085 | $1,504 | 38.6% | $180k | $209k | 16.0% | 22.6% | Open history |
| 6 | Redding, CA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,265 | $1,650 | 30.4% | $348k | $377k | 8.5% | 21.8% | Open history |
| 7 | Jackson, MI2021-06 → 2026-06 | $783 | $1,121 | 43.2% | $189k | $230k | 21.3% | 21.8% | Open history |
| 8 | Oak Harbor, WA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,530 | $2,052 | 34.2% | $576k | $647k | 12.4% | 21.8% | Open history |
| 9 | Beaumont, TX2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,039 | $1,297 | 24.8% | $182k | $188k | 3.6% | 21.3% | Open history |
| 10 | San Francisco, CA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $2,647 | $3,301 | 24.7% | $1100k | $1142k | 3.8% | 20.9% | Open history |
| 11 | Punta Gorda, FL2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,491 | $1,896 | 27.1% | $279k | $299k | 7.2% | 19.9% | Open history |
| 12 | Shreveport, LA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,091 | $1,358 | 24.4% | $177k | $186k | 4.6% | 19.8% | Open history |
| 13 | Fairbanks, AK2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,348 | $1,744 | 29.3% | $288k | $316k | 9.6% | 19.7% | Open history |
| 14 | Ruston, LA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,106 | $1,402 | 26.7% | $210k | $227k | 8.2% | 18.5% | Open history |
| 15 | Odessa, TX2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,176 | $1,551 | 31.9% | $225k | $256k | 13.8% | 18.1% | Open history |
| 16 | Tuscaloosa, AL2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,098 | $1,480 | 34.7% | $190k | $222k | 16.9% | 17.8% | Open history |
| 17 | Corvallis, OR2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,310 | $1,807 | 37.9% | $468k | $563k | 20.3% | 17.6% | Open history |
| 18 | Salinas, CA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $2,182 | $2,906 | 33.2% | $736k | $855k | 16.1% | 17.0% | Open history |
| 19 | Midland, TX2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,224 | $1,620 | 32.3% | $287k | $331k | 15.3% | 16.9% | Open history |
| 20 | Florence, AL2021-06 → 2026-06 | $775 | $1,122 | 44.7% | $171k | $219k | 27.9% | 16.9% | Open history |
| 21 | Harrisonburg, VA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,262 | $1,807 | 43.2% | $280k | $354k | 26.5% | 16.7% | Open history |
| 22 | Chico, CA2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,314 | $1,560 | 18.7% | $397k | $405k | 2.1% | 16.6% | Open history |
| 23 | Boise City, ID2021-06 → 2026-06 | $1,575 | $1,874 | 19.0% | $485k | $497k | 2.6% | 16.5% | Open history |
| 24 | Columbia, MO2021-06 → 2026-06 | $956 | $1,415 | 47.9% | $247k | $327k | 32.3% | 15.7% | Open history |
The visible table is intentionally limited for reading. The CSV contains every row that passes the printed inclusion rule.
Inclusion first, interpretation second.
Include every current RentMarker market area with direct Zillow ZORI and ZHVI observations in the latest month and the same month five years earlier. Classify a gap within two percentage points as near pace; place larger positive gaps in rent-ahead and larger negative gaps in home-value-ahead. Rank by rent change minus home-value change.
Methodology version: v11Method
- Five-year rent change divides the ending direct monthly ZORI value by the same-month starting ZORI value and subtracts one.
- Five-year home-value change uses the identical calculation and months on direct ZHVI values.
- Growth gap subtracts home-value change from rent change; it is not a yield, forecast, appreciation estimate or property-level return.
Counter-signals
- Current gross yield uses current rent and home-value levels, so identical growth gaps can coexist with very different starting yields.
- Employment, supply, migration and local unit mix can move differently from either Zillow index.
- A rent-ahead gap can close through slower rent, faster home values or both; the screen does not predict which path follows.
Limitations
- ZHVI and ZORI are smoothed market indexes, not a matched property portfolio or observed acquisition-and-lease pair.
- The changes are nominal and do not remove inflation, transaction costs, renovation, vacancy or operating expenses.
- Only direct same-month endpoints enter; a missing endpoint remains unavailable rather than interpolated.
Every input release used by this study
Release and retrieval dates stay visible so a reader can tell whether two measures describe the same moment.