Counties / Kansas / Anderson County

Anderson County, KS

FIPS 20003 · population 7,834 · outside every metro area

$199k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$199k
▲ 6.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$853
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$877
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+79.4%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.8%FHFA HPI2025+1.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$171k
Surveyed gross rent$853
Rent burden 30%+50.9%
Median year built1964
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
10.5%vacant
3,586estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.1% renter
owner 78.9%renter 21.1%
Structure mix87.7% single-family
Single-family 87.7%20+ units 0.8%Mobile home 7.2%Other 4.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,447▲ 1.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments246annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$921▲ 0.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities37.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.0%WEEKLY WAGE+0.7%Trade, transportation, and utilities37.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Anderson County presents a price-momentum-versus-income-underwriting tension: investors able to verify local leases and flood exposure should investigate, while yield-led buyers should be cautious. Zillow’s county value rose 6.8% at its 2026-06 observation. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI, reported for annual 2025, rose 1.53% year over year. The measures use different vintages and methods; they show positive direction but cannot be combined into one appreciation rate or treated as closed-sale values.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unresolved. Zillow’s median home value was $198,614, but county market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot fill that gap. The 1.37% effective property-tax rate and $2,353 median annual tax identify carrying costs, but market rent, insurance, maintenance, vacancy and financing are absent; rent coverage and cash flow therefore cannot be underwritten.

03Demand & competition

Migration and workplace evidence add context, not proof of durable demand. Net migration was 29 tax-return households, and incoming households had higher average AGI than outgoing households. Non-occupants accounted for 2 of 68 purchase mortgages, or 2.94%, a measured participation level that does not describe every competing buyer. QCEW recorded 2,447 annual average covered jobs at county workplaces, up 1.03%. Trade, transportation, and utilities held 37.04% of total private covered jobs, making its concentration relevant; QCEW is neither resident employment nor unemployment.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual climate loss ratio is 0.16% of building value; it is a modeled county-level expectation, not a parcel loss estimate. No Realtor.com MLS listing price, active-listing, days-on-market or price-reduction figures are supplied for the 2026-06 inventory label, so visible supply, marketing time and seller concessions cannot be assessed. Next checks are lease comparables, flood zone and elevation, insurance, property expenses, vacancy, financing, and closed-sale evidence; their absence blocks a defensible yield, liquidity and property-level risk conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Anderson County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Garnett city3.2KColony city335Greeley city243Welda CDP233Kincaid city188Westphalia city161Lone Elm city40Harris CDP9
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

9 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Garnett cityIncorporated place
    3,202
  2. 02
    Colony cityIncorporated place
    335
  3. 03
    Greeley cityIncorporated place
    243
  4. 04
    Welda CDPCensus-designated place
    233
  5. 05
    Kincaid cityIncorporated place
    188
  6. 06
    Westphalia cityIncorporated place
    161
  7. 07
    Lone Elm cityIncorporated place
    40
  8. 08
    Harris CDPCensus-designated place
    9
  9. 09
    Mont Ida CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.155% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.37%

$2,353 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+29

205 in · 176 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$10,279

$51,898 arriving · $41,619 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors2.9%

2 of 68 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual asking rents may not support property taxes and other carrying costs at observed values.
  2. Parcel flood exposure, insurance terms, or repair requirements may differ materially from the county-level climate model.
  3. Employment concentration and limited mortgage-based investor data may not represent the subject property’s tenant pool or buyer set.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. County market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used as a substitute for market rent.

Can Zillow and FHFA appreciation be treated as the same measure?

No. Zillow reports a county value observation, while FHFA reports a repeat-transaction HPI with a separately labeled annual period.

What dominant hazard should be screened first?

Inland flood; the county-level climate metric does not replace parcel-specific flood and insurance review.