States / Kansas
State rental intelligence

Kansas rental market data

A source-traced view across 12 metro markets and 105 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

11/12 metros scored105/105 counties with FEMA risk15 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro64.0out of 100 · 11 measured metros
Kansas identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$225kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,145monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield6.1%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.4%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Kansas rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,1662026-07 · ▲ 1.7% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index5.4%2026-07 · +0.1 pp in 12 months
Time on market26 days2026-07 · +4 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,522$1,108$693Rental Vacancy Index8.3%5.3%2.3%2017-012021-102026-07KansasUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rents rose 1.7% even as listing time lengthened and net migration was negative, making local demand and exit liquidity the decisive screens in Kansas.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Apartment List's July 2026 recent-lease rent for Kansas was $1,166, up 1.7% from $1,147 a year earlier while the national measure fell 1.1%. Its separate Vacancy Index was 5.4%, 1.7 percentage points below the national rate. The counter-signal is leasing speed: state time on market increased 3.6 days to 26.3 days, although that remained 3.7 days shorter than the national measure.

Demand evidence does not fully confirm the rent strength. Net migration was negative by 3,096 people across 103 measured counties, or 1.05 per 1,000 residents, while median job growth across 12 metros was only 0.4%. Screening should therefore test local employers, achievable rent and exit depth rather than extend the state rent series to every property. Coverage is uneven: Zillow county rents are available for only 18 of 105 counties, year-over-year county rent data for 14, and Realtor.com listing measures for 48.

01

Apartment List rent rose 1.7% while time on market increased 3.6 days → retain the rent-growth evidence but screen leases with a longer marketing-time assumption.

02

Net migration was negative by 3,096 and median metro job growth was 0.4% → require property-level demand tied to specific employers and household catchments.

03

Median Zillow asking-rent growth was 5.3% versus 4.0% home-value growth → test whether the rent-price gap translates into an acceptable property yield after expenses.

04

County Realtor.com marketing time had a 60.5-day median and a 110.5-day 90th percentile → assign exit assumptions by county and sample depth rather than using metro liquidity.

05

County stock was 84.3% single-family at the median, with only 1.5% large multifamily → verify that rent comparables match the asset type being screened.

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Rent gains coexist with a slower lease-up clock

Kansas recent-lease rent increased from $1,147 to $1,166, a 1.7% gain. The national measure declined 1.1%, leaving the state's growth rate 2.7 percentage points higher. This is direct state evidence of rent movement, not a metro or county median.

The separate Vacancy Index edged from 5.38% to 5.44%, an increase of 0.06 percentage points, while remaining 1.7 percentage points below the national rate. Time on market moved in the less favorable direction, rising from 22.7 to 26.3 days. Rent growth, vacancy and marketing time therefore do not describe uniformly tightening conditions, and none establishes a particular property's occupancy or achievable rent.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Employment and household movement

Out-migration tempers modest metro job growth

IRS data show net migration of negative 3,096 across 103 measured counties, equal to negative 1.05 per 1,000 residents. Metro employment was positive at the median but muted: 0.4% across 12 metros, with the measured distribution running from negative 0.9% at the 10th percentile to positive 1.3% at the 90th.

There are genuine local counter-signals. Job growth was 1.5% in Salina, 1.3% in Topeka and 1.0% in St. Joseph. Those readings identify places for deeper demand review, but they do not show how many new workers rent, what units they seek or whether their employment gains offset household movement within each property catchment.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Price and rent momentum

Asking rents are outrunning values, but yields still diverge

Separately from Apartment List's recent-lease series, Zillow asking rents increased by a median 5.3% across 11 measured metros, versus 4.0% median home-value growth across 12. The supplied median gap is 1.3 percentage points. Asking-rent growth ranged from 3.5% to 5.8% between the 10th and 90th percentiles, while value growth ranged from 1.7% to 6.8%.

Momentum does not rank gross yield by itself. Emporia recorded 7.7% asking-rent growth and 5.4% value growth, but a 5.0% gross yield. Lawrence's gross yield was 4.5%, compared with 6.9% in Joplin. These mechanical yields exclude vacancy, concessions, maintenance, taxes, insurance and financing.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

04
Supply and resale conditions

Tight resale in building hubs does not remove local exit risk

Across 12 measured metros, the median resale market had 2.1 months of supply and an 18-day median marketing time. The 90th-percentile readings were 4.5 months and 34.9 days. Price drops affected a median 31.4% of listings, while the median sale-to-list ratio was 98.5% across the 10 metros with that measure.

Wichita combined 4,380 permitted units, or 6.71 per 1,000 residents, with 1.8 months of resale supply and 17 days on market. Manhattan reported 476 permitted units, 3.55 per 1,000, 1.6 months of supply and 16 days on market. Pittsburg was slower at 36 days and had a 94.9% sale-to-list ratio. Permits are authorized units rather than completions, and the packet does not identify how many are rentals, so they cannot establish future rental competition.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
County market dispersion

County appreciation and listing liquidity split sharply

FHFA's latest annual measure covered 62 counties and had a median gain of 4.4%, but the distribution extended from negative 2.3% at the 10th percentile to positive 14.8% at the 90th. Longer-run strength did not guarantee a similar current result: Anderson County had 79.4% five-year appreciation but only 1.5% in the latest year, while Rice County had 70.9% over five years and 19.9% in the latest year.

Realtor.com marketing-time data cover 48 counties, with a median of 60.5 days and a 90th-percentile reading of 110.5 days. Wichita County's 217-day result came with only one active listing and a 200% pending ratio; Haskell County had 133 days on 11 listings, and Ness County had 121 days on 12. Thin samples can make individual county readings unstable. Zillow price data cover all 105 counties, but rents cover only 18 and year-over-year rents only 14, preventing a complete county yield comparison.

Evidence: FHFA House Price Index — annual county appreciation · Realtor.com Economic Research — county listing inventory · Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rents

06
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Older, single-family-heavy stock complicates vacancy signals

Across 105 counties, the median county housing vacancy rate was 14.9%, with a 7.8% to 24.8% range between the 10th and 90th percentiles. The median county renter share was 23.8%, while single-family homes represented 84.3% of stock and large multifamily properties only 1.5%. The median of county median-year-built estimates was 1962.

Elk County had 33.0% housing vacancy and a 21.2% renter share; Woodson County and Chautauqua County had vacancy rates of 32.0% and 31.3%. Tenant pressure also varies independently: the share of renters paying at least 30% of income was 59.2% in Thomas County, 56.6% in Smith County and 54.8% in Ellis County, where housing vacancy was 7.8%. These ACS vacancy figures cover all housing, not the Apartment List rental vacancy series or a count of market-ready rental units.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

Evidence selected for Kansas

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.9%0.3%1.3%Net migration / 1k-1.1Net household movement-3,096
Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change1.7%4.0%6.8%Asking-rent change3.5%5.3%5.8%Rent minus price1.3%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.72.85.1Months of supply1.3×2.1×4.5×Days on market16 days18 days35 daysListings with cuts23.5%31.4%41.3%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution11 scored metros · median 64.0
00–19020–39240–59860–79180–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
17%18/105Rent100%105/105Climate98%103/105Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Pittsburg7.9%Topeka6.9%Joplin6.9%Salina6.7%Hutchinson6.5%Wichita6.4%St. Joseph5.8%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Kansas

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Salina, KS80$184k$1,0216.7%▲ 1.5%
2Topeka, KS75$222k$1,2826.9%▲ 1.3%
3St. Joseph, MO67$218k$1,0475.8%▲ 1.0%
4Hutchinson, KS66$159k$8556.5%▲ 0.6%
5Joplin, MO64$229k$1,3156.9%▲ 0.7%
6Kansas City, MO64$332k$1,5455.6%▲ 0.5%
7Lawrence, KS64$344k$1,2944.5%▲ 0.2%
8Pittsburg, KS64$142k$9317.9%▼ 0.1%
9Wichita, KS63$227k$1,2046.4%▲ 0.2%
10Emporia, KS59$194k$8065.0%▼ 2.8%
11Manhattan, KS51$273k$1,2675.6%▼ 0.9%

Showing the top 11 scored metros of 12. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Kansas

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Johnson County, KS620,631$469k$1,8154.7%inland flooding
Sedgwick County, KS528,226$229k$1,2046.3%inland flooding
Shawnee County, KS178,025$210k$1,2857.3%inland flooding
Wyandotte County, KS167,654$213k$1,3177.4%inland flooding
Douglas County, KS120,302$344k$1,2944.5%inland flooding
Leavenworth County, KS83,123$355k$1,3294.5%inland flooding
Riley County, KS71,946$279k$1,2765.5%inland flooding
Butler County, KS68,287$253k$1,3746.5%inland flooding
Reno County, KS61,553$159k$8556.5%inland flooding
Saline County, KS53,668$184k$1,0186.6%inland flooding
Crawford County, KS39,008$142k$9317.9%inland flooding
Finney County, KS38,084$239kn/an/ainland flooding
County yield sample18/105counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−3,096IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share9.2%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Sources used in this analysis

Measured releases, not a global source count

Only sources supporting the selected evidence modules are listed here.

Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. The direct rent, vacancy and time-on-market series are statewide measures and cannot establish conditions around a specific Kansas property.
  2. Negative measured migration and modest median job growth weaken any thesis that relies on broad household-demand expansion, despite stronger employment readings in several named markets.
  3. Permit counts do not show completions, timing, tenure or unit quality, so treating them as future rental supply would overstate the evidence.
  4. County evidence is sparse: Zillow rents cover 18 counties, year-over-year rents 14, and Realtor.com listing measures 48; several extreme listing results also have very few active properties.
  5. The median of county median-year-built estimates is 1962, but the packet has no property-condition, renovation, insurance or operating-cost data needed to convert gross yield into return.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Do the state rental series show unambiguously tight landlord conditions?

No. Recent-lease rent rose 1.7% and the Vacancy Index was 5.4%, but time on market increased 3.6 days to 26.3. The three separate measures show rent strength alongside slower leasing.

Where does the packet show positive employment counter-signals?

Job growth was 1.5% in Salina, 1.3% in Topeka and 1.0% in St. Joseph. Those readings are stronger than the 0.4% median across 12 metros, but they do not identify renter-household growth.

Should Wichita's and Manhattan's permit totals be treated as incoming rental competition?

Not directly. Wichita reported 4,380 permitted units and Manhattan 476, but the data do not show completions, delivery dates or whether the units are owner-occupied or rental.

Do high county ACS vacancy rates mean many rentals are available?

No. ACS vacancy covers all housing and is separate from Apartment List's rental Vacancy Index. It does not establish that vacant units are rentable, habitable or located near the target property.

Can the packet identify the best Kansas market by return?

No. It reports gross yields and market distributions, but county rent coverage is incomplete and property-level vacancy, concessions, condition, taxes, insurance, maintenance and financing are not assembled into a net return measure.