States / Kansas
State rental intelligence

Kansas rental market data

A source-traced view across 12 metro markets and 105 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

11/12 metros scored105/105 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro64.0out of 100 · 11 measured metros
Kansas identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$225kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,145monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield6.1%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.4%trailing 12-month metro employment
State research brief

Rent growth has a measured edge over home-value growth, but net out-migration and uneven resale liquidity make local tenant depth the key screen.

Updated 2026-07-31 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Across measured Kansas metros, median rent growth is 5.3% while median home-value growth is 4.0%, leaving a 1.3 percentage-point rent advantage. That is the clearest favorable signal, but it sits beside net migration of -3,096 across 103 counties with migration data and median metro job growth of only 0.35%.

Use the rent-price spread as a first-pass screen, then test each locality for job support, broad vacancy, renter depth, pipeline and resale liquidity. The evidence cannot establish property-level occupancy, lease collections, operating costs, condition, insurance or financing. Kansas coverage is also uneven: county rent data reach 18 of 105 counties and county listing data reach 48, while the underlying releases cover different periods.

01

Median metro rent growth of 5.3% versus 4.0% price growth → screen for improving revenue-to-value alignment, not guaranteed net income

02

Net migration of -3,096 and median job growth of 0.35% → require local employment and renter-demand confirmation

03

Median supply of 2.1 months and 18 days on market alongside a 31.4% price-drop share → test negotiating room even in faster markets

04

Median county vacancy of 14.9% and single-family share of 84.3% → verify rentable occupancy and turnover at the neighborhood level

05

County listing time of 60.5 days across only 48 measured counties → apply a locality-specific exit-liquidity screen

01
Price and rent momentum

Rent gains have a modest edge over value growth

Median rent growth across 11 measured metros is 5.3%, compared with 4.0% median home-value growth across 12 metros. The supplied difference is 1.3 percentage points. The distributions still overlap substantially: rent growth runs from 3.5% at the 10th percentile to 5.8% at the 90th, while price growth spans 1.7% to 6.8%.

Emporia shows 7.7% rent growth against 5.4% price growth, a calculated 2.3 percentage-point gap. Lawrence shows 5.8% against 3.6%, a calculated 2.2-point gap. These examples support screening current rents against entry values, but index growth does not establish achievable lease renewals, occupancy or net operating income.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Employment and household movement

Demand support is mixed, not absent

Measured county migration is a counterweight to the rent signal: net migration totals -3,096 across 103 counties, or -1.1 per 1,000 residents. Metro job growth is positive but limited at the median, 0.35%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range from -0.86% to 1.30%.

Local positives prevent the aggregate result from becoming a blanket demand conclusion. Salina records 1.45% job growth and Topeka 1.33%. Screening should therefore require locality-level employment and renter evidence rather than treating either statewide net out-migration or a positive metro job figure as conclusive.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Supply and resale conditions

Fast metro turnover still comes with frequent repricing

The median measured metro has 2.1 months of supply and an 18-day marketing time, yet 31.4% of listings show price drops. Among the 10 metros with sale-to-list data, the median is 98.5%. Fast turnover therefore does not eliminate price negotiation.

Wichita combines 4,380 permitted units, or 6.71 per 1,000 residents, with 1.8 months of supply and 17 days on market. Pittsburg takes 36 days, has 2.4 months of supply and records a 94.9% sale-to-list ratio. Current resale tightness, permitting activity and seller pricing should be screened separately rather than collapsed into a single supply conclusion.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Entry cost and affordability

Lower entry prices drive the strongest listed yields

Across 12 measured metros, the median value is $224,539.5, median monthly rent is $1,145 and median gross yield is 6.1%. The gross-yield range from the 10th to 90th percentile is 5.0% to 6.9%. Median rent-to-income is 20.8%, while measured rent is 109.6% of the two-bedroom fair-market-rent standard, a calculated 9.6% premium.

Pittsburg has the strongest listed gross yield at 7.9%, based on a $141,880 value and $931 monthly rent; its rent-to-income measure is 21.2%. Topeka shows a 6.9% gross yield and 22.0% rent-to-income. These are revenue-to-value screens before vacancy, maintenance, taxes, insurance, management and financing, so they cannot be read as net returns.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

05
County market dispersion

County appreciation does not guarantee an easy exit

County value growth is widely dispersed. Across 105 counties, the median annual change is 4.7%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range from -1.7% to 10.0%. The median five-year FHFA increase is 49.4% across 64 measured counties. Listing evidence is thinner and slower: only 48 counties are covered, with a median of 60.5 days on market and a 90th percentile of 110.5 days.

Wichita County records 217 days on market, but that figure rests on only one active listing and should not be treated as a stable liquidity estimate. Haskell County shows 133 days with 11 listings, while Ness County shows 121 days and a 16.7% pending ratio. Appreciation history and an executable resale path are separate screens.

Evidence: FHFA House Price Index — annual county appreciation · Realtor.com Economic Research — county listing inventory · Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rents

06
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Vacancy and older, single-family-heavy stock complicate occupancy

Across all 105 counties, the median broad housing vacancy rate is 14.9%, rising to 24.8% at the 90th percentile. The median stock is 84.3% single-family, while large multifamily represents only 1.5%; the median year built is 1962. Renters account for a median 23.8% of households, and 39.6% of renters are cost-burdened at the median county.

Elk County combines 33.0% broad vacancy with an 83.3% single-family share. Thomas County has a 59.2% renter-burden rate, while Ellis County combines 7.8% vacancy with a 36.8% renter share. These contrasts make county-level occupancy and property condition important checks. The ACS vacancy measure covers all housing and does not identify units that are available, rentable or suitable for a target tenant.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

Evidence selected for Kansas

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change1.7%4.0%6.8%Asking-rent change3.5%5.3%5.8%Rent minus price1.3%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.9%0.3%1.3%Net migration / 1k-1.1Net household movement-3,096
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.72.85.1Months of supply1.3×2.1×4.5×Days on market16 days18 days35 daysListings with cuts23.5%31.4%41.3%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution11 scored metros · median 64.0
00–19020–39240–59860–79180–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
17%18/105Rent100%105/105Climate98%103/105Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Pittsburg7.9%Topeka6.9%Joplin6.9%Salina6.7%Hutchinson6.5%Wichita6.4%St. Joseph5.8%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Kansas

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Salina, KS80$184k$1,0216.7%▲ 1.5%
2Topeka, KS75$222k$1,2826.9%▲ 1.3%
3St. Joseph, MO67$218k$1,0475.8%▲ 1.0%
4Hutchinson, KS66$159k$8556.5%▲ 0.6%
5Joplin, MO64$229k$1,3156.9%▲ 0.7%
6Kansas City, MO64$332k$1,5455.6%▲ 0.5%
7Lawrence, KS64$344k$1,2944.5%▲ 0.2%
8Pittsburg, KS64$142k$9317.9%▼ 0.1%
9Wichita, KS63$227k$1,2046.4%▲ 0.2%
10Emporia, KS59$194k$8065.0%▼ 2.8%
11Manhattan, KS51$273k$1,2675.6%▼ 0.9%

Showing the top 11 scored metros of 12. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Kansas

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Johnson County, KS620,631$469k$1,8154.7%inland flooding
Sedgwick County, KS528,226$229k$1,2046.3%inland flooding
Shawnee County, KS178,025$210k$1,2857.3%inland flooding
Wyandotte County, KS167,654$213k$1,3177.4%inland flooding
Douglas County, KS120,302$344k$1,2944.5%inland flooding
Leavenworth County, KS83,123$355k$1,3294.5%inland flooding
Riley County, KS71,946$279k$1,2765.5%inland flooding
Butler County, KS68,287$253k$1,3746.5%inland flooding
Reno County, KS61,553$159k$8556.5%inland flooding
Saline County, KS53,668$184k$1,0186.6%inland flooding
Crawford County, KS39,008$142k$9317.9%inland flooding
Finney County, KS38,084$239kn/an/ainland flooding
County yield sample18/105counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−3,096IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share9.2%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Sources used in this analysis

Measured releases, not a global source count

Only sources supporting the selected evidence modules are listed here.

Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Metro momentum uses 11 rent-growth observations versus 12 price-growth observations, so the median spread is not a fully paired statewide result.
  2. County rent coverage reaches only 18 of 105 counties and listing coverage only 48, leaving substantial geographic gaps.
  3. Gross yields exclude vacancy, repairs, management, taxes, insurance and financing, any of which can materially change property economics.
  4. Migration, housing-stock, employment and market measures come from different release periods and are not synchronous.
  5. Aggregate net out-migration can hide local strength; positive job growth in Salina and Topeka is a genuine counter-signal.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Are rents rising faster than home values?

At the measured-metro median, yes: rent growth is 5.3% and price growth is 4.0%, a 1.3 percentage-point difference. Rent growth covers 11 metros, however, versus 12 for price growth.

Does negative migration rule out every Kansas locality?

No. Net migration is -3,096 across 103 counties, but Salina records 1.45% job growth and Topeka 1.33%. The packet supports local screening, not a uniform demand conclusion.

Where is the strongest listed gross-yield example?

Pittsburg, at 7.9% on a $141,880 value and $931 monthly rent. That is a gross ratio before operating and financing costs.

How liquid are measured exits?

Metro resale is relatively fast at an 18-day median, but the 48 covered counties have a 60.5-day median and a 110.5-day 90th percentile. Very small listing counts make some county figures unstable.

Can the county vacancy rate be treated as available rental supply?

No. The 14.9% median is an ACS vacancy measure for all housing, not a count of market-ready rentals or units suitable for a particular tenant.