Counties / Kansas / Sedgwick County

Sedgwick County, KS

FIPS 20173 · population 528,226 · part of Wichita, KS

$229k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Sedgwick County, KS?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,204 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,2042026-06 · up 5.2% year over year
County ACS gross rent$998ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,099FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Sedgwick County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$782Sedgwick County, KSHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$849Sedgwick County, KSHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,099Sedgwick County, KSHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,444Sedgwick County, KSHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,784Sedgwick County, KSHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$229k
▲ 3.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,204
▲ 5.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.3%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,099
market rent is 1.10x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+49.4%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+3.3%FHFA HPI2025+3.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$203k
Surveyed gross rent$998
Rent burden 30%+44.1%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
9.2%vacant
227,638estimated housing units
Occupied tenure36.9% renter
owner 63.1%renter 36.9%
Structure mix74.0% single-family
Single-family 74.0%20+ units 6.8%Mobile home 3.1%Other 16.1%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs265,704▲ 0.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments14,174annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,214▲ 4.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing20.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.3%WEEKLY WAGE+4.1%Manufacturing20.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Sedgwick CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$35k$70k196919972024$4k$63k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Sedgwick CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI16,43083.2% burdened30–50% HAMFI13,96073.1% burdened50–80% HAMFI18,27030.1% burdened80–100% HAMFI8,6859.1% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI18,5051.4% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Sedgwick County, KS

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 20173. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,072$993$9142021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,0722026-07 · +0.2% year over year
Rental vacancyn/an/a
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Sedgwick County presents a decision tension: an apparently usable gross-rent spread versus carrying-cost and inland-flood uncertainty. The supplied Zillow county observation pairs a $228,674 median home value with $1,204 monthly median asking rent and a 6.32% gross yield before operating costs. That is a screening relationship, not property cash flow or a sale comp. Income-focused buyers should investigate parcel-level flood and expense exposure; buyers relying mainly on appreciation should be cautious because the record does not establish net returns or closed-sale liquidity.

02Housing economics

Zillow reports its median home value up 3.32% and its median asking rent up 5.16% in its supplied county observation. HUD’s $1,099 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard—not market asking rent—and supplied market rent is 9.6% above it. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.25% in its separately supplied annual observation; it confirms direction but is neither a home value nor a growth rate to blend with Zillow. An effective property-tax rate of 1.21%, $2,461 median annual tax, and modeled annual expected climate loss of 0.14% of building value require carrying-cost review; the dominant hazard is inland flood.

03Demand & competition

QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces grew 0.35%. Manufacturing, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounts for 20.14% of private covered jobs. These data describe workplaces, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast, and the industry is not the whole economy. Tax-return migration shows a net inflow, yet average AGI was lower for movers in than movers out; that pairing does not prove renter demand or purchasing power. Non-occupants represented 14.45% of 6,587 purchase mortgages, indicating competition worth reviewing at transaction level, not proof that they set prices or rents.

04Risk & next checks

The record publishes no Realtor.com MLS median listing price, active listing count, days on market, price-reduced share, or pending ratio. It therefore cannot show visible supply, marketing time, seller concessions, or pending activity. Nor does it provide closed-sale comps, unit-level leases, vacancy, insurance quotes, maintenance costs, debt terms, or parcel flood maps. Those gaps prevent an underwriting conclusion on net operating income, debt coverage, flood insurability, or exit liquidity.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Sedgwick County, KS

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$890$1,582Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$692highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range34.3%50.0%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered54,761across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.67037$1,58267203$1,30067226$1,23567207$1,20467217$1,16667218$1,08767216$1,07467212$1,06167208$1,02067213$97167211$90767214$890
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.52.5%47.3%42.1%37.0%31.8%672036721267207672186721167213672176722667216672086721467037Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.67037+128.6%67203+119.3%67207+110.5%67218+108.7%67216+108.5%67217+103.2%67214+101.1%67226+90.8%67213+90.7%67212+90.7%67211+85.6%67208+82.9%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

In Sedgwick County, the decision is not simply whether rent is low or high, but which part of a broad selected direct-evidence range fits a household’s budget and search constraints. Across 12 ZIP/ZCTA matches covering 54,761 renter households, Zillow ZORI for June 2026 ranges from $890 to $1,582, a $692 spread; the median is $1,080.50, below the county Zillow figure of $1,204. A countywide typical asking-rent figure therefore obscures meaningful variation among these selected areas. Begin the search with the intended unit and lease rather than treating the selected median as an available-unit quote; then weigh current asking-rent level, recent movement, and the household’s acceptable vacancy and burden context.

Keep the three rent lenses distinct. Zillow’s ZIP ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index: in this set its annual changes range from 3.9% in 67217 to 10.2% in 67216, compared with 5.2% for the county. ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rent is a survey estimate of rent paid, not a current asking-rent index: the selected values span $776 to $1,202, while county ACS median gross rent is $998. HUD’s FY2026 two-bedroom FMR is an administrative standard rather than asking rent; shown ZIP values run from $880 to $1,360. The observed ZORI-to-HUD ratio runs from 82.9% in 67208 to 128.6% in 67037; it is a reference comparison, not a conversion between standards or an estimate of a unit’s rent.

Affordability and availability signals require a two-axis read, not a ranking. A simple annual income screen of forty times the Zillow monthly index runs from $35,600 to $63,280 across the direct range; it is a preliminary thirty-percent-of-income calculation, not a household qualification test. In ACS ZCTA estimates, the rent-burden share ranges from 34.3% to 50.0%, while vacancy ranges from 5.5% to 25.7%. Higher vacancy does not establish lower achievable rent, and a lower asking-rent index does not eliminate burden: these figures are separate measures with different definitions and periods. Treat burden as evidence of renter budget pressure and vacancy as a stock condition, then test active listings, concessions, and eligibility case by case.

Coverage and geography limit any ZIP-level conclusion. The direct-evidence selection is not an exhaustive county inventory and should not be read as a complete map of smaller areas. ACS geographies are ZCTAs, statistical areas that do not equal USPS delivery ZIPs. ZIPs can cross county lines; this packet assigns display geography through the largest HUD residential-address share, which is 100% for each shown ZIP. Before acting, verify the active asking rent for the exact bedroom count, lease term, utility treatment, deposits and fees, income or voucher rules, availability date, and the property’s actual address and county location. Those property-level checks determine the real option; the area-level indices and survey estimates do not.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

17 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
67203$1,300$934$1,09037.9%9.9%$52k100.0%
67212$1,061$1,006$1,17034.3%6.8%$42k100.0%
67207$1,204$988$1,09037.5%10.8%$48k100.0%
67218$1,087$905$1,00048.1%12.9%$43k100.0%
67211$907$814$1,06040.6%15.3%$36k100.0%
67213$971$916$1,07044.0%17.4%$39k100.0%
67217$1,166$976$1,13042.4%8.0%$47k100.0%
67226$1,235$1,202$1,36041.7%5.5%$49k100.0%
67216$1,074$894$99043.9%13.7%$43k100.0%
67208$1,020$1,009$1,23039.5%10.1%$41k100.0%
67214$890$776$88050.0%25.7%$36k100.0%
67037$1,582$1,136$1,23042.6%6.3%$63k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

The ZIP labels are display assignments based on the largest HUD residential-address county share. ZIPs may cross county lines, and ACS ZCTAs are statistical approximations rather than USPS delivery ZIP boundaries; neither geography identifies a specific property’s location or service area.

The selected direct-evidence set covers only matched eligible ZIP/ZCTA observations and is not an exhaustive county inventory. Zillow ZORI, ACS five-year survey estimates, and HUD FMRs differ in timing, population, construction, and purpose, so none alone establishes a current rent for a particular unit.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Sedgwick County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Wichita city397.9KDerby city26.1KHaysville city11.1KBel Aire city9KValley Center city8.6KPark City city7.7KMaize city6.8KMulvane city*6.2K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

26 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Wichita cityIncorporated place
    397,945
  2. 02
    Derby cityIncorporated place
    26,062
  3. 03
    Haysville cityIncorporated place
    11,117
  4. 04
    Bel Aire cityIncorporated place
    9,043
  5. 05
    Valley Center cityIncorporated place
    8,590
  6. 06
    Park City cityIncorporated place
    7,673
  7. 07
    Maize cityIncorporated place
    6,824
  8. 08
    Mulvane cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    6,171
  9. 09
    Goddard cityIncorporated place
    6,030
  10. 10
    Kechi cityIncorporated place
    2,901
  11. 11
    Oaklawn-Sunview CDPCensus-designated place
    2,789
  12. 12
    Clearwater cityIncorporated place
    2,716
Show 14 more places
  1. 13
    Cheney cityIncorporated place
    2,580
  2. 14
    McConnell AFB CDPCensus-designated place
    1,907
  3. 15
    Sedgwick cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,614
  4. 16
    Colwich cityIncorporated place
    1,492
  5. 17
    Garden Plain cityIncorporated place
    1,126
  6. 18
    Andale cityIncorporated place
    1,062
  7. 19
    Eastborough cityIncorporated place
    919
  8. 20
    Mount Hope cityIncorporated place
    763
  9. 21
    Bentley cityIncorporated place
    480
  10. 22
    Viola cityIncorporated place
    190
  11. 23
    St. Marks CDPCensus-designated place
    156
  12. 24
    Greenwich CDPCensus-designated place
    62
  13. 25
    Furley CDPCensus-designated place
    49
  14. 26
    Peck CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    22

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.142% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.21%

$2,461 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+303

9,760 in · 9,457 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$5,575

$56,260 arriving · $61,835 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors14.4%

952 of 6,587 mortgages

investorother financed
Same metro

The other counties in Wichita, KS

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Sedgwick County528,226$229k$1,2046.3%inland flooding
Butler County68,287$253k$1,3746.5%inland flooding
Harvey County33,756$198k$1,1056.7%inland flooding
Sumner County22,353$153kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Parcel-level inland-flood exposure or insurance availability could exceed the county modeled-loss signal.
  2. Unpublished vacancy, operating expenses, and financing terms could make the gross yield a weak net-cash-flow measure.
  3. Missing MLS and closed-sale evidence could reveal weaker liquidity or pricing than county indicators suggest.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is a measured market-rent figure published?

Yes. The record publishes median asking rent separately from HUD Fair Market Rent.

What does the FHFA measure represent?

It is a repeat-transaction home-price appreciation index, not a dollar home value.

Can visible MLS supply and seller concessions be assessed from this record?

No. Realtor.com listing, inventory, marketing-time, reduction, and pending metrics are not published.