Counties / Nebraska / Arthur County

Arthur County, NE

FIPS 31005 · population 484 · outside every metro area

$186k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$186k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$750
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$961
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported value$186k
Surveyed gross rent$750
Rent burden 30%+37.5%
Median year built1974
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
20.3%vacant
232estimated housing units
Occupied tenure19.5% renter
owner 80.5%renter 19.5%
Structure mix84.0% single-family
Single-family 84.0%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 15.1%Other 0.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs80▼ 10.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments14annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$702▲ 10.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorNatural resources and mining0.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−10.1%WEEKLY WAGE+10.0%Natural resources and mining0.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Arthur County is a small-scale, low-visibility underwriting case: buyers needing dependable lease-up, resale liquidity, or an evidence-based return should be cautious, while operators able to verify a specific asset may investigate. Its 484 residents and 80 annual average QCEW covered jobs at county workplaces in 2025 leave little margin for extrapolation. Employment fell 10.11% year over year even as the covered-worker average weekly wage rose to $702. That wage is not household income, and QCEW is neither resident employment nor a demand forecast.

02Housing economics

Housing economics have no current market-price or market-rent series. In ACS 2024 5-year survey context, owner-occupied homes had a $185,900 median reported value and occupied rentals a $750 median gross rent; those are different surveyed populations, not transaction or asking-market measurements, and must not be combined into yield. With no published market rent, gross yield cannot be computed. The provided HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The 0.93% effective tax rate and $1,733 median annual tax identify carrying-cost inputs but require parcel-level confirmation.

03Demand & competition

The ACS reports 20.26% vacancy and rent burden; descriptive survey estimates that warrant lease-up and affordability diligence, not forecasts. Purchases record one total purchase and 0% investor share. That establishes no reliable reading of buyer competition from non-occupant lending. Migration and mover-income data are not published, so the record cannot test whether household flows bring spending capacity. No Realtor.com MLS listing, active-supply, days-on-market or price-reduction evidence is published; nor are Zillow county values or FHFA repeat-transaction HPI observations, leaving price direction and marketing liquidity unmeasured.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled climate loss at 0.20% of building value per year; that model should be paired with parcel flood zone, elevation, claims history, coverage terms and quotes rather than converted into a dollar loss. Natural resources and mining is named as the largest disclosed private supersector, but reported detail is insufficient to establish an economic base. Next checks are current comparable asking rents and executed leases, property condition and insurance, tax assessment, and actual listing and closed-sale records. These gaps prevent a defensible yield, exit-price, or demand-depth conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Arthur County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Arthur village66
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

1 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Arthur villageIncorporated place
    66

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.202% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.93%

$1,733 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migrationn/a

Household flow not published

Arriving vs leaving incomen/a

Income flow not published

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors0.0%

0 of 1 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Absent market rent prevents a defensible gross-yield calculation.
  2. Missing listing and transaction evidence can leave entry price and resale liquidity assumptions unsupported.
  3. Property-specific inland-flood exposure and insurance costs may differ materially from the modeled county loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be substituted for market rent.

Does the record establish the level of investor buyer competition?

No. It reports no investor participation, but only one total purchase is recorded.

What labor-market trend is documented?

QCEW reports year-over-year decline in covered jobs at county workplaces; it does not measure resident employment.