States / Nebraska
State rental intelligence

Nebraska rental market data

A source-traced view across 11 metro markets and 93 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

7/11 metros scored93/93 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro58.0out of 100 · 7 measured metros
Nebraska identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$261kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,308monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield6.0%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.5%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Nebraska rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,1932026-07 · ▲ 1.1% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index6.2%2026-07 · +1.4 pp in 12 months
Time on marketn/anot published for this state
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,517$1,130$743Rental Vacancy Index7.9%5.2%2.5%2017-012021-102026-07NebraskaUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rent rose 1.1% as rental vacancy jumped 1.4 percentage points, while the measured metro rent-growth median lagged home values, requiring Nebraska rent and occupancy to be screened separately.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Apartment List's July 2026 state series shows a mixed rental signal: recent-lease rent increased to $1,193, but its separate Vacancy Index rose from 4.8% to 6.2%. The counter-signal is that Nebraska's measured vacancy remained 1.0 percentage point below the 7.2% national rate, while state rent growth exceeded the national rate by 2.2 percentage points.

Local screening matters more than the state direction. Median asking-rent growth was 2.7% across seven measured metros, versus 3.8% median home-value growth across 11, yet Kearney and Omaha reversed that relationship. The packet supports comparisons of rent, vacancy, employment, resale conditions, housing stock, taxes and hazards; it does not establish property-level occupancy, operating expenses, insurance costs or net yield. County Zillow rent coverage reaches only 12 of 93 counties, and no Nebraska time-on-market series is supplied for rentals.

01

Recent-lease rent up 1.1% while rental vacancy rose 1.4 percentage points → underwrite occupancy and concessions separately from rent growth

02

Measured metro rent-growth median of 2.7% versus 3.8% for home values → do not assume rent growth is keeping pace with acquisition values

03

Lexington at 9.5 months of supply and a 95.8% sale-to-list ratio → apply locality-specific exit and liquidity assumptions

04

Median metro employment up 0.5% alongside net migration of negative 1,571 → verify whether local job gains are translating into renter-household demand

05

Median county stock year of 1962 and 86.3% single-family share → screen property condition and product fit rather than treating units as interchangeable

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Vacancy widened despite positive recent-lease rent growth

Nebraska's Apartment List recent-lease rent increased from $1,180 to $1,193, a 1.1% annual gain. Its separate Vacancy Index moved from 4.8% to 6.2%, an increase of 1.4 percentage points. Positive rent movement therefore does not remove the need to underwrite occupancy and concessions independently.

The current state vacancy rate was still 1.0 percentage point below the 7.2% national measure, and state rent growth was 2.2 percentage points above the national rate. That is a meaningful counter-signal to a uniformly weak reading. The packet supplies only national rental time on market—30 days, up from 28—so it cannot establish Nebraska's leasing speed.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Home values generally outran rents, but Kearney broke the pattern

Across the measured distributions, median home-value growth was 3.8% for 11 metros, while median asking-rent growth was 2.7% for seven. The reported difference was negative 1.1 percentage points. Home-value growth ranged from 1.7% at the 10th percentile to 6.8% at the 90th; measured rent growth ranged from 0.6% to 6.5%. Because rent and price coverage differ, these are distribution comparisons rather than a fully paired state sample.

Kearney moved in the opposite direction, with asking rent up 11.0% and home value up 6.8%. Omaha also had rent growth of 3.0% versus value growth of 2.2%, while Norfolk's rent rose 3.5% against 5.0% value growth. These splits support locality-specific rent and acquisition comps; they do not establish collected rent, concessions, expenses or net operating income.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Supply and resale conditions

A compact resale median conceals Lexington's 9.5 months of supply

The measured metro median was 2.5 months of resale supply and 28 days on market, but 30.2% of listings had price drops and the median sale-to-list ratio was 98.3%. Months of supply ranged from 1.4 at the 10th percentile to 3.8 at the 90th, showing that the median does not describe every exit market.

Lexington stood well outside that range with 9.5 months of supply, 50 days on market, price drops on 29.8% of listings and a 95.8% sale-to-list ratio. By contrast, Omaha and Lincoln each had 1.4 months of supply, alongside 7,134 and 1,896 permitted units, respectively. Permits are not completed rental units, and Redfin resale time is not Apartment List rental time on market; these figures screen acquisition and exit conditions rather than future rental competition.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Employment and household movement

Modest employment growth coexists with net household outflow

Employment growth across 11 measured metros had a 0.5% median, with the distribution running from negative 1.0% at the 10th percentile to positive 1.6% at the 90th. North Platte posted 4.9% growth, while Beatrice and Fremont recorded 1.6% and 1.1%, respectively.

The migration evidence points the other way: across 80 covered counties, net migration totaled negative 1,571, or negative 0.8 per 1,000 residents, and the aggregate mover-income gap was negative $153,085. The combination argues against treating positive metro employment as proof of broad household inflow. The job and IRS migration series cover different periods and do not identify renter households, so property-level demand still requires current local verification.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Older, single-family-heavy stock meets concentrated renter burden

Across all 93 counties, the median ACS vacancy rate was 14.3%, with a 6.0% to 28.8% 10th-to-90th percentile range. The median renter share was 24.8%, the median single-family share was 86.3%, and the median year built was 1962. These are county housing-stock distributions, not Apartment List rental vacancy or a count of units currently available to a target tenant.

At least 30% of renters were burdened in a median 34.3% of county observations. The measured share was 57.6% in Brown County, 56.3% in Garden County and 52.1% in Red Willow County; their median years built were 1959, 1953 and 1959. Those figures support closer screening of tenant affordability and capital needs, but ACS stock age does not establish a particular property's condition or renovation budget.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

Tax bills and hazard-loss measures require county-level underwriting

Across 93 counties, the effective property-tax-rate median was 1.27%, with a 0.99% to 1.48% 10th-to-90th percentile range; the median tax bill was $1,876. Sarpy County measured 1.74% and $5,473, Douglas County 1.69% and $4,507, and Kimball County 1.67% and $1,828. Rate and bill therefore need separate treatment in property underwriting.

The county climate-loss-ratio median was 0.187%, ranging from 0.121% to 0.246% between the 10th and 90th percentiles. FEMA assigned inland flood as the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for 92 counties and hail for one. Those labels describe each county's leading hazard only; they do not show parcel-level exposure, insurance availability or an expected loss for a specific building.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

Evidence selected for Nebraska

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change1.7%3.8%6.8%Asking-rent change0.6%2.7%6.5%Rent minus price-1.1%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k1.42.65.5Months of supply1.4×2.5×3.8×Days on market20 days28 days50 daysListings with cuts23.8%30.2%41.3%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.0%0.5%1.6%Net migration / 1k-0.8Net household movement-1,571
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution7 scored metros · median 58.0
00–19220–39340–59260–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
13%12/93Rent100%93/93Climate86%80/93Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Lexington7.2%Sioux City6.7%Beatrice6.2%Grand Island6.2%Columbus6.1%North Platte6.0%Fremont5.9%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Nebraska

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Kearney, NE68$301k$1,4175.7%▲ 0.4%
2Lincoln, NE60$307k$1,3425.3%▲ 0.6%
3Norfolk, NE59$261k$1,2475.7%▲ 0.7%
4Omaha, NE58$312k$1,4445.5%▲ 0.5%
5Fremont, NE54$250k$1,2315.9%▲ 1.1%
6Sioux City, IA39$227k$1,2636.7%▼ 1.0%
7Grand Island, NE37$261k$1,3376.2%▼ 0.3%

Showing the top 7 scored metros of 11. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Nebraska

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Douglas County, NE590,736$300k$1,4485.8%inland flooding
Lancaster County, NE326,696$306k$1,3455.3%inland flooding
Sarpy County, NE197,389$361k$1,4664.9%inland flooding
Hall County, NE62,536$261k$1,3376.1%inland flooding
Buffalo County, NE50,579$306k$1,4005.5%inland flooding
Dodge County, NE37,351$250k$1,2315.9%inland flooding
Scotts Bluff County, NE35,843$201kn/an/ainland flooding
Madison County, NE35,532$260k$1,2785.9%inland flooding
Platte County, NE34,716$284k$1,4476.1%inland flooding
Lincoln County, NE33,802$229k$1,1366.0%inland flooding
Adams County, NE31,052$218kn/an/ahail
Cass County, NE27,161$316k$1,2764.8%inland flooding
County yield sample12/93counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−1,571IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share10.6%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. The rental thesis may not hold at property level: Apartment List is a state series, metro rent growth covers seven of 11 metros, and county Zillow rent covers 12 of 93 counties.
  2. Apartment List recent-lease rent, its Vacancy Index, Zillow asking rent, ACS vacancy and Redfin listing time have different definitions and must not be blended.
  3. Employment and IRS migration cover different periods, so their tension does not establish the current direction of tenant demand.
  4. Building permits do not establish completions, tenure or the amount of competing rental supply that will reach the market.
  5. Gross rent and value measures omit concessions, operating costs, capital work, financing and insurance; hazard labels also do not identify parcel exposure.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Does the state rent increase by itself support a rental acquisition?

No. Recent-lease rent rose 1.1%, but the separate Vacancy Index increased from 4.8% to 6.2%. The packet supports testing rent and occupancy independently, not inferring net income from the state rent series.

Which measured metro shows the clearest resale-liquidity warning?

Lexington stands out with 9.5 months of supply, 50 days on market and a 95.8% sale-to-list ratio. Those are resale measures and do not establish rental leasing speed.

Are Nebraska's measured demand indicators aligned?

No. Median employment growth was positive at 0.5% across 11 metros, while covered counties recorded net migration of negative 1,571. Different periods and coverage prevent treating either measure as a complete current demand signal.

Does the county housing data prove that older properties require major renovation?

No. The median county stock year was 1962, but ACS stock age does not report the condition of a specific building. It identifies where inspection and capital-budget assumptions deserve closer review.

Can the FEMA labels and county tax figures price a specific property's risk?

No. County tax rates and bills provide local operating-cost benchmarks, while FEMA's leading-hazard labels are county classifications. Neither establishes parcel-level exposure, insurance premiums or a final property tax bill.