Counties / Nebraska / Douglas County

Douglas County, NE

FIPS 31055 · population 590,736 · part of Omaha, NE

$300k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Douglas County, NE?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,448 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,4482026-06 · up 3.2% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,201ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,368FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Douglas County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,090Douglas County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,148Douglas County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,368Douglas County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,813Douglas County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,046Douglas County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$300k
▲ 1.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,448
▲ 3.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.8%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,368
market rent is 1.06x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+46.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.5%FHFA HPI2025+2.2%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$266k
Surveyed gross rent$1,201
Rent burden 30%+49.5%
Median year built1977
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
5.2%vacant
251,553estimated housing units
Occupied tenure38.5% renter
owner 61.5%renter 38.5%
Structure mix69.6% single-family
Single-family 69.6%20+ units 12.8%Mobile home 0.9%Other 16.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs341,609▲ 0.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments19,020annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,345▲ 3.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services22.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.3%WEEKLY WAGE+3.1%Education and health services22.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Douglas CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$45k$90k196919972024$4k$86k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Douglas CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI21,36079.0% burdened30–50% HAMFI17,14575.2% burdened50–80% HAMFI20,07033.1% burdened80–100% HAMFI10,03510.5% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI19,7252.9% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Douglas County, NE

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 31055. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,276$1,175$1,0732021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,2732026-07 · +0.9% year over year
Rental vacancy6.5%2026-07 · +1.7 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Douglas County presents a carry-cost-versus-income tension: published market rent produces a usable top-line return, while tax, inland-flood and demand evidence can narrow it. Buyers who can test parcel-level expenses and leasing should investigate; those requiring confirmed resale liquidity or durable tenant depth should be cautious. Zillow’s county reading labeled 2026-06 reports a $300,227 median home value and $1,448 monthly median asking rent, with a 5.79% gross yield before costs. County aggregates do not establish a subject property’s condition, achievable rent or financing result.

02Housing economics

Asking rent rose 3.24% while Zillow median home value rose 1.46% in that observation. The FHFA 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI gained 2.22% and shows a 46.88% cumulative five-year gain; it confirms a positive direction but is not a dollar home value, and its vintage and method cannot be averaged with Zillow’s. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,368 is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate or substitute for measured asking rent. The effective property-tax rate is 1.69%, with a $4,507 median annual tax; gross yield is therefore not net yield.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS snapshot reports a year-over-year fall in median listing prices, less visible active supply, longer median marketing time and some price reductions. Those are asking-price, supply, marketing and seller-concession evidence, not closed sales or proof of buyer demand. Tax-return migration had more movers leaving than arriving, and departing households had higher average AGI; that weakens the demand case without identifying tenants. Investor mortgages to non-occupants represented 10.64% of purchase mortgages. QCEW reports covered workplace employment, not resident jobs or unemployment; Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the entire economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled climate loss ratio is 0.15% of building value; it is an expected-loss model, not parcel-specific claims experience. Missing parcel flood zone, insurance quotes, elevation and loss history prevent a net-yield conclusion. Missing vacancy, lease-renewal, operating-cost and closed-sale comparable data prevent conclusions on stabilized cash flow and exit pricing. Verify parcel assessments and tax bills because county tax evidence is not a carry-cost estimate.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Douglas County, NE

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,041$1,819Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$778highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range43.1%60.0%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered60,065across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.68106$1,81968137$1,63768104$1,54868131$1,49568114$1,43668102$1,34268164$1,33668111$1,30568105$1,25868154$1,24668127$1,15368134$1,041
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.62.5%57.0%51.6%46.1%40.6%681046813468131681056812768106681116815468102681146816468137Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.68104+123.8%68106+123.7%68131+116.8%68111+110.6%68137+103.0%68105+99.1%68114+92.6%68154+90.9%68164+85.6%68127+84.8%68102+78.9%68134+78.9%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

The shown direct-Zillow ZIP evidence, a typical observed asking-rent index, has a broad current range from $1,041 to $1,819: a $778 spread around a $1,339 median. That dispersion makes a single county figure an incomplete screen. Douglas County’s Zillow ZORI is $1,448, while ZIP-level annual index changes range from 0.8% to 5.2%, versus 3.2% countywide. The decision is not simply to seek the lowest index. It is to compare the index and its recent movement with a specific unit’s asking price, size, lease terms, and household budget, then weigh those checks against separately measured burden and vacancy. The range supports multiple price positions in the selected evidence, not a countywide ranking of every ZIP.

Zillow, HUD, and ACS values should remain on separate tracks. Across shown ZIPs, HUD’s two-bedroom standards run from $1,180 to $1,700. At the low and high observed-index ends, the Zillow index is respectively 79% and 124% of the corresponding HUD FMR. These are bedroom-specific administrative benchmarks, so the ratios do not mean that available units at the Zillow index have a matching bedroom count or qualify under HUD rules. Separately, ACS five-year ZCTA median gross rent ranges from $1,046 to $1,400, against $1,201 for the county ACS measure. This survey estimate should not be averaged with Zillow into a single current market rent.

Burden is distributed across the shown rent range rather than limited to the high-index end. ACS rent-burden shares span 43.1% to 60.0%, with the county at 49.5%. In ZIP 68111, median household income of $42,185 is below the $52,200 annual income required under a 30% rent-to-income screen; ZIP 68106 has $69,806 versus $72,760 under the same screen. These comparisons use a current index alongside ACS income and are screening ratios, not household-level affordability findings. Estimated ACS vacancy runs from 2.7% to 15.2%, compared with 5.2% countywide. A higher survey vacancy can be a lead to inspect listings, but cannot establish real-time availability, concessions, unit condition, or a less burdensome rent.

Coverage and geography constrain the reading. The selected direct-evidence set covers 60,065 renter households but is expressly not an exhaustive county or subcounty inventory. ZIP display assignment follows the county holding the largest HUD residential-address share, although ZIPs may cross county lines. ACS figures describe Census ZCTAs, statistical areas that are not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs. Before acting on any comparison, verify the property address and county assignment, current advertised rent, bedroom count, utilities and fees, lease duration, income and credit rules, availability date, concessions, and whether the pertinent HUD program uses the applicable standard. Those property-level checks prevent an index, survey estimate, or administrative standard from being treated as a quote.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

24 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
68104$1,548$1,077$1,25050.2%6.1%$62k100.0%
68134$1,041$1,080$1,32047.0%6.9%$42k100.0%
68131$1,495$1,141$1,28049.8%11.3%$60k100.0%
68105$1,258$1,097$1,27044.0%9.3%$50k100.0%
68127$1,153$1,046$1,36045.4%4.2%$46k100.0%
68106$1,819$1,277$1,47046.8%4.4%$73k100.0%
68111$1,305$1,126$1,18060.0%10.1%$52k100.0%
68154$1,246$1,220$1,37048.2%2.7%$50k100.0%
68102$1,342$1,260$1,70043.6%15.2%$54k100.0%
68114$1,436$1,227$1,55050.7%3.0%$57k100.0%
68164$1,336$1,288$1,56049.5%5.8%$53k100.0%
68137$1,637$1,400$1,59043.1%2.7%$65k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

ACS ZCTA measures are five-year survey estimates for statistical Census areas, not real-time measures for USPS delivery ZIPs. ZCTA boundaries and populations need not match a searched mailing ZIP, a listing’s service address, or the geography used by another rental dataset.

The displayed set is selected direct evidence, not a complete inventory, and ZIPs may cross county lines. The report assigns a ZIP to the county with the largest HUD residential-address share; this does not establish the county location of every property or respondent.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Douglas County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Omaha city488.8KRalston city6.5KValley city3.2KBennington city2.4KWaterloo village990Boys Town village809King Lake CDP101Venice CDP73
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

8 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Omaha cityIncorporated place
    488,837
  2. 02
    Ralston cityIncorporated place
    6,472
  3. 03
    Valley cityIncorporated place
    3,174
  4. 04
    Bennington cityIncorporated place
    2,366
  5. 05
    Waterloo villageIncorporated place
    990
  6. 06
    Boys Town villageIncorporated place
    809
  7. 07
    King Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    101
  8. 08
    Venice CDPCensus-designated place
    73

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.149% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.69%

$4,507 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-359

14,185 in · 14,544 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$9,382

$64,502 arriving · $73,884 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors10.6%

780 of 7,330 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,246▼ 9.3% year over year
Median days on market37▲ 4.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced10.6%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Omaha, NE

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Douglas County590,736$300k$1,4485.8%inland flooding
Sarpy County197,389$361k$1,4664.9%inland flooding
Pottawattamie County93,424$245k$1,3566.7%inland flooding
Cass County27,161$316k$1,2764.8%inland flooding
Saunders County23,048$364kn/an/ainland flooding
Washington County21,106$406kn/an/ainland flooding
Harrison County14,632$232kn/an/ainland flooding
Mills County14,568$288kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Parcel flood exposure, insurance pricing and assessments could consume the pre-cost return.
  2. Out-migration with higher-income departures may leave demand less resilient than county aggregates suggest.
  3. MLS listings are not closed sales, so exit value and liquidity remain unverified.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is market rent published for a gross-yield screen?

Yes. The record publishes median asking rent and a gross yield before costs; HUD FMR is separately a payment standard.

What does Realtor.com establish about sale prices?

Nothing conclusive. It provides MLS asking-price, active-supply, marketing-time and price-reduction evidence rather than closed-sale pricing.

What does QCEW employment measure?

Annual average covered jobs at workplaces in the county, not resident employment, unemployment or a forecast.