Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 31055 · population 590,736 · part of Omaha, NE
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,448 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,090 | Douglas County, NE | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,148 | Douglas County, NE | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,368 | Douglas County, NE | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $1,813 | Douglas County, NE | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $2,046 | Douglas County, NE | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 31055. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Douglas County presents a carry-cost-versus-income tension: published market rent produces a usable top-line return, while tax, inland-flood and demand evidence can narrow it. Buyers who can test parcel-level expenses and leasing should investigate; those requiring confirmed resale liquidity or durable tenant depth should be cautious. Zillow’s county reading labeled 2026-06 reports a $300,227 median home value and $1,448 monthly median asking rent, with a 5.79% gross yield before costs. County aggregates do not establish a subject property’s condition, achievable rent or financing result.
Asking rent rose 3.24% while Zillow median home value rose 1.46% in that observation. The FHFA 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI gained 2.22% and shows a 46.88% cumulative five-year gain; it confirms a positive direction but is not a dollar home value, and its vintage and method cannot be averaged with Zillow’s. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,368 is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate or substitute for measured asking rent. The effective property-tax rate is 1.69%, with a $4,507 median annual tax; gross yield is therefore not net yield.
Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS snapshot reports a year-over-year fall in median listing prices, less visible active supply, longer median marketing time and some price reductions. Those are asking-price, supply, marketing and seller-concession evidence, not closed sales or proof of buyer demand. Tax-return migration had more movers leaving than arriving, and departing households had higher average AGI; that weakens the demand case without identifying tenants. Investor mortgages to non-occupants represented 10.64% of purchase mortgages. QCEW reports covered workplace employment, not resident jobs or unemployment; Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the entire economy.
Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled climate loss ratio is 0.15% of building value; it is an expected-loss model, not parcel-specific claims experience. Missing parcel flood zone, insurance quotes, elevation and loss history prevent a net-yield conclusion. Missing vacancy, lease-renewal, operating-cost and closed-sale comparable data prevent conclusions on stabilized cash flow and exit pricing. Verify parcel assessments and tax bills because county tax evidence is not a carry-cost estimate.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
The shown direct-Zillow ZIP evidence, a typical observed asking-rent index, has a broad current range from $1,041 to $1,819: a $778 spread around a $1,339 median. That dispersion makes a single county figure an incomplete screen. Douglas County’s Zillow ZORI is $1,448, while ZIP-level annual index changes range from 0.8% to 5.2%, versus 3.2% countywide. The decision is not simply to seek the lowest index. It is to compare the index and its recent movement with a specific unit’s asking price, size, lease terms, and household budget, then weigh those checks against separately measured burden and vacancy. The range supports multiple price positions in the selected evidence, not a countywide ranking of every ZIP.
Zillow, HUD, and ACS values should remain on separate tracks. Across shown ZIPs, HUD’s two-bedroom standards run from $1,180 to $1,700. At the low and high observed-index ends, the Zillow index is respectively 79% and 124% of the corresponding HUD FMR. These are bedroom-specific administrative benchmarks, so the ratios do not mean that available units at the Zillow index have a matching bedroom count or qualify under HUD rules. Separately, ACS five-year ZCTA median gross rent ranges from $1,046 to $1,400, against $1,201 for the county ACS measure. This survey estimate should not be averaged with Zillow into a single current market rent.
Burden is distributed across the shown rent range rather than limited to the high-index end. ACS rent-burden shares span 43.1% to 60.0%, with the county at 49.5%. In ZIP 68111, median household income of $42,185 is below the $52,200 annual income required under a 30% rent-to-income screen; ZIP 68106 has $69,806 versus $72,760 under the same screen. These comparisons use a current index alongside ACS income and are screening ratios, not household-level affordability findings. Estimated ACS vacancy runs from 2.7% to 15.2%, compared with 5.2% countywide. A higher survey vacancy can be a lead to inspect listings, but cannot establish real-time availability, concessions, unit condition, or a less burdensome rent.
Coverage and geography constrain the reading. The selected direct-evidence set covers 60,065 renter households but is expressly not an exhaustive county or subcounty inventory. ZIP display assignment follows the county holding the largest HUD residential-address share, although ZIPs may cross county lines. ACS figures describe Census ZCTAs, statistical areas that are not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs. Before acting on any comparison, verify the property address and county assignment, current advertised rent, bedroom count, utilities and fees, lease duration, income and credit rules, availability date, concessions, and whether the pertinent HUD program uses the applicable standard. Those property-level checks prevent an index, survey estimate, or administrative standard from being treated as a quote.
24 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68104 | $1,548 | $1,077 | $1,250 | 50.2% | 6.1% | $62k | 100.0% |
| 68134 | $1,041 | $1,080 | $1,320 | 47.0% | 6.9% | $42k | 100.0% |
| 68131 | $1,495 | $1,141 | $1,280 | 49.8% | 11.3% | $60k | 100.0% |
| 68105 | $1,258 | $1,097 | $1,270 | 44.0% | 9.3% | $50k | 100.0% |
| 68127 | $1,153 | $1,046 | $1,360 | 45.4% | 4.2% | $46k | 100.0% |
| 68106 | $1,819 | $1,277 | $1,470 | 46.8% | 4.4% | $73k | 100.0% |
| 68111 | $1,305 | $1,126 | $1,180 | 60.0% | 10.1% | $52k | 100.0% |
| 68154 | $1,246 | $1,220 | $1,370 | 48.2% | 2.7% | $50k | 100.0% |
| 68102 | $1,342 | $1,260 | $1,700 | 43.6% | 15.2% | $54k | 100.0% |
| 68114 | $1,436 | $1,227 | $1,550 | 50.7% | 3.0% | $57k | 100.0% |
| 68164 | $1,336 | $1,288 | $1,560 | 49.5% | 5.8% | $53k | 100.0% |
| 68137 | $1,637 | $1,400 | $1,590 | 43.1% | 2.7% | $65k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 68135 rental reportDouglas County | Omaha, NE | $1,869 | ▲ 0.5% | 21.6% | 30,523 |
| ZIP 68106 rental reportDouglas County | Omaha, NE | $1,819 | ▲ 2.6% | 46.8% | 21,224 |
| ZIP 68116 rental reportDouglas County | Omaha, NE | $1,809 | ▲ 0.7% | 39.4% | 34,501 |
| ZIP 68022 rental reportDouglas County | Omaha, NE | $1,678 | ▲ 2.2% | 38.9% | 36,538 |
| ZIP 68104 rental reportDouglas County | Omaha, NE | $1,548 | ▲ 5.2% | 50.2% | 36,673 |
| ZIP 68164 rental reportDouglas County | Omaha, NE | $1,336 | ▲ 1.5% | 49.5% | 28,564 |
| ZIP 68105 rental reportDouglas County | Omaha, NE | $1,258 | ▲ 4.9% | 44.0% | 22,807 |
| ZIP 68154 rental reportDouglas County | Omaha, NE | $1,246 | ▲ 2.6% | 48.2% | 24,060 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.149% of building value expected lost per year
$4,507 median annual bill
14,185 in · 14,544 out
$64,502 arriving · $73,884 leaving
780 of 7,330 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas County | 590,736 | $300k | $1,448 | 5.8% | inland flooding |
| Sarpy County | 197,389 | $361k | $1,466 | 4.9% | inland flooding |
| Pottawattamie County | 93,424 | $245k | $1,356 | 6.7% | inland flooding |
| Cass County | 27,161 | $316k | $1,276 | 4.8% | inland flooding |
| Saunders County | 23,048 | $364k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
| Washington County | 21,106 | $406k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
| Harrison County | 14,632 | $232k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
| Mills County | 14,568 | $288k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
Yes. The record publishes median asking rent and a gross yield before costs; HUD FMR is separately a payment standard.
Nothing conclusive. It provides MLS asking-price, active-supply, marketing-time and price-reduction evidence rather than closed-sale pricing.
Annual average covered jobs at workplaces in the county, not resident employment, unemployment or a forecast.