Counties / Nebraska / Lancaster County

Lancaster County, NE

FIPS 31109 · population 326,696 · part of Lincoln, NE

$306k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Lancaster County, NE?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,345 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,3452026-06 · up 2.7% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,085ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,141FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Lancaster County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$855Lancaster County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$926Lancaster County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,141Lancaster County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,587Lancaster County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,712Lancaster County, NEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$306k
▲ 3.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,345
▲ 2.7% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.3%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,141
market rent is 1.18x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+49.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+3.5%FHFA HPI2025+3.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$275k
Surveyed gross rent$1,085
Rent burden 30%+47.0%
Median year built1983
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
4.4%vacant
140,324estimated housing units
Occupied tenure41.0% renter
owner 59.0%renter 41.0%
Structure mix66.5% single-family
Single-family 66.5%20+ units 13.3%Mobile home 1.4%Other 18.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs176,915▲ 0.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments9,838annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,183▲ 3.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities21.3% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.9%WEEKLY WAGE+3.7%Trade, transportation, and utilities21.3%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Lancaster CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$35k$70k196919972024$4k$68k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Lancaster CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI11,49085.2% burdened30–50% HAMFI10,38070.2% burdened50–80% HAMFI13,46529.6% burdened80–100% HAMFI6,1854.8% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI11,3202.3% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Lancaster County, NE

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 31109. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,192$1,084$9762021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,1922026-07 · +3.1% year over year
Rental vacancy6.3%2026-07 · +2.8 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lancaster County has a pricing-versus-entry-cost tension: home-value and repeat-sale evidence rise, while visible listings require negotiation. Buyers able to verify rents and flood exposure should investigate; appreciation- or quick-resale-led cases warrant caution. Zillow reports a $305,844 median home value in 2026-06, up 3.55% year over year. Separately, FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose annually. It is not a home value, and its vintage and method cannot be combined with Zillow into a single growth rate.

02Housing economics

Measured median asking rent is $1,345 per month in 2026-06, producing the reported 5.28% gross yield before expenses. That is market rent, unlike the supplied $1,141 HUD FMR payment standard; asking rent is 17.9% above FMR by calculation, not implied by it. The 1.53% effective property-tax rate and $4,204 median tax sharpen the carrying-cost screen against that pre-cost yield. Rent by unit type, vacancy, insurance, repairs, financing and operating costs are not published, so net yield and debt-service coverage cannot be underwritten.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS evidence shows 913 active listings, 18.74% more than a year earlier, while median listing price fell 1.81%; price reductions add seller concessions. Active listings are visible supply, listing prices are asks, and reductions are not closed-sale pricing or buyer-demand proof. Marketing time lengthened, while the pending ratio is only a listing-status measure. Tax-return migration was slightly negative, with inbound movers reporting lower average AGI than outbound movers. Investor mortgages were a minority of reported purchases, showing a competing buyer segment without establishing price support.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is dominant, and modeled annual climate loss equals 0.14% of building value; this is modeled exposure, not a property-specific loss estimate. QCEW’s 2025 workplace data show employment and average weekly wages increased, with Trade, transportation, and utilities the largest disclosed private supersector; these are covered jobs and wages, not resident employment, unemployment or a forecast. Missing sale-price, submarket-rent, flood-zone, insurance-quote, condition, lease and financing evidence prevents parcel-level return or resilience conclusions. Check these, tax assessments and competing rentals before treating county signals as property economics.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Lancaster County, NE

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$854$1,622Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$768highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range34.6%55.3%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered50,726across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.68507$1,62268521$1,50268516$1,50168512$1,46868505$1,36968522$1,31468506$1,28068503$1,22268504$1,21668502$1,01168510$1,01168508$854
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.57.8%51.4%45.0%38.5%32.1%685216851668508685046850268506685036851068505685076851268522Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.68507+153.9%68521+142.5%68516+142.4%68512+139.3%68505+129.9%68522+124.7%68506+121.4%68503+115.9%68504+115.4%68502+95.9%68510+95.9%68508+81.0%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected ZIP/ZCTA matches, Zillow’s June 2026 ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $854 to $1,622, producing a $768 spread around a $1,297 median. The county ZORI is $1,345, but that county figure should not stand in for a particular ZIP or listing. Annual ZORI movement also differs, from 0.8 percent to 4.5 percent versus 2.7 percent countywide. The spread is large enough that household budget screening should begin with a live property quote rather than the county figure. The decision is not which ZIP is generically affordable; it is whether a currently available unit’s asking rent, configuration, and lease terms fit a household’s budget after property-level review.

ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rents range from $785 to $1,261, a survey measure with a different period and construct from ZORI. Every selected ZIP shows a FY 2026 HUD two-bedroom standard of $1,054, while the countywide two-bedroom FMR is $1,141. HUD is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. ACS rents and HUD standards answer different questions: one reports survey outcomes and the other supports program administration. Against the ZIP HUD standard, ZORI spans 81.0 percent to 153.9 percent; that is a benchmark comparison, not an assertion that either measure is the other or that every listed unit has two bedrooms.

The ACS five-year burden and vacancy lens introduces a separate trade-off. County estimates put 46.97 percent of renter households at 30 percent or more of income devoted to rent and show a 4.42 percent vacancy rate. In 68508, the corresponding measures are 55.28 percent burdened and 10.77 percent vacant; in 68512 they are 34.63 percent and 1.68 percent. These pairings do not establish that vacancy reduces burden or that vacancy measures active rental listings. The burden measure concerns existing renter households, while vacancy is not the count or price of rentals that can actually be leased. Use both as separate survey indicators for budget screening and availability checks with current listing information and household-specific income.

Geographic and coverage limits are material. The HUD–USPS crosswalk assigns each display ZIP to the county holding the largest residential-address share; every shown match has a 100.0 percent Lancaster County share, yet ZIPs can cross county lines and Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. The 12 shown matches cover 50,726 renter households but derive from 14 eligible matches, so they are not an exhaustive county inventory. Selection also does not substitute for unit-level evidence. Before acting on any comparison, check the property’s current advertised rent, availability date, bedroom count, lease term, utilities and mandatory fees, eligibility rules, actual address, and delivery ZIP.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

14 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
68521$1,502$1,231$1,05454.9%3.9%$60k100.0%
68516$1,501$1,261$1,05442.2%2.7%$60k100.0%
68508$854$785$1,05455.3%10.8%$34k100.0%
68504$1,216$1,064$1,05437.8%6.1%$49k100.0%
68502$1,011$850$1,05440.9%5.4%$40k100.0%
68506$1,280$1,180$1,05450.6%4.4%$51k100.0%
68503$1,222$1,023$1,05446.4%7.7%$49k100.0%
68510$1,011$892$1,05436.6%5.9%$40k100.0%
68505$1,369$1,157$1,05441.0%1.3%$55k100.0%
68507$1,622$882$1,05449.5%4.0%$65k100.0%
68512$1,468$1,251$1,05434.6%1.7%$59k100.0%
68522$1,314$1,204$1,05448.9%2.4%$53k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

The ACS figures are 2024 five-year ZCTA estimates, whereas the Zillow values are June 2026 ZIP ZORI observations and the HUD figures are FY 2026 standards. Differing geography, timing, and definitions prevent direct equivalence.

ZIPs are displayed through a HUD residential-address county crosswalk, and Census ZCTAs do not precisely match USPS delivery ZIPs. The selected direct-evidence set omits eligible matches and is not a complete county inventory; confirm each property address and current terms.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Lancaster County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Lincoln city294.9KWaverly city4.4KHickman city3KBennet village1.2KFirth village604Walton CDP579Malcolm village480Hallam village346
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

22 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Lincoln cityIncorporated place
    294,856
  2. 02
    Waverly cityIncorporated place
    4,440
  3. 03
    Hickman cityIncorporated place
    3,004
  4. 04
    Bennet villageIncorporated place
    1,218
  5. 05
    Firth villageIncorporated place
    604
  6. 06
    Walton CDPCensus-designated place
    579
  7. 07
    Malcolm villageIncorporated place
    480
  8. 08
    Hallam villageIncorporated place
    346
  9. 09
    Yankee Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    250
  10. 10
    Roca villageIncorporated place
    242
  11. 11
    Panama villageIncorporated place
    232
  12. 12
    Raymond villageIncorporated place
    187
Show 10 more places
  1. 13
    Sprague villageIncorporated place
    176
  2. 14
    Denton villageIncorporated place
    145
  3. 15
    Cheney CDPCensus-designated place
    144
  4. 16
    Martell CDPCensus-designated place
    133
  5. 17
    Davey villageIncorporated place
    117
  6. 18
    Princeton CDPCensus-designated place
    99
  7. 19
    Kramer CDPCensus-designated place
    7
  8. 20
    Emerald CDPCensus-designated place
    6
  9. 21
    Agnew CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  10. 22
    Prairie Home CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.135% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.53%

$4,204 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-93

6,862 in · 6,955 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$4,743

$56,717 arriving · $61,460 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors12.6%

530 of 4,195 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings913▲ 18.7% year over year
Median days on market39▲ 5.4% year over year
Listings price-reduced10.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 1.8% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Lincoln, NE

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Lancaster County326,696$306k$1,3455.3%inland flooding
Seward County17,641$322kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level flood-zone status and insurance costs may differ materially from the county modeled exposure.
  2. Unpublished unit rents, vacancy and operating costs may materially change gross-yield economics.
  3. MLS listing softening may not translate into executable purchase pricing or durable buyer depth.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the reported gross yield a cash-flow measure?

No. It is a gross yield based on market asking rent before expenses.

Can HUD FMR be used as the county’s asking-rent estimate?

No. The record identifies HUD FMR as a payment standard, separate from measured market asking rent.

Does the QCEW employment evidence measure county residents’ jobs?

No. It measures annual average covered jobs at workplaces located in the county.