Counties / North Dakota / Bowman County

Bowman County, ND

FIPS 38011 · population 2,906 · outside every metro area

$191k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$191k
▲ 8.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$765
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$873
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+8.5%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$165k
Surveyed gross rent$765
Rent burden 30%+18.6%
Median year built1972
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
21.0%vacant
1,635estimated housing units
Occupied tenure16.7% renter
owner 83.3%renter 16.7%
Structure mix82.5% single-family
Single-family 82.5%20+ units 1.4%Mobile home 11.7%Other 4.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,482▲ 10.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments203annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,187▲ 12.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities36.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+10.3%WEEKLY WAGE+12.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities36.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Bowman County presents a tension between a rising Zillow value signal and thin evidence on rent, resale depth and household demand. Zillow’s June 2026 median home value was $190,682, up 8.46% year over year. Investors requiring income coverage or exit liquidity should investigate those gaps; those relying on rapid scaling should be cautious. In 2025, QCEW covered employment at county workplaces grew 10.27%, with a $1,187 average weekly wage for covered workers. Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. No FHFA repeat-transaction HPI observation is published to test Zillow’s direction.

02Housing economics

Housing economics are unproven. Realtor.com’s June 2026 MLS data show median listing price up 30.72% year over year, 11 active listings, a 21-day median marketing time, and 7.41% of listings reduced. These are asking-price, visible-supply, marketing-time and concession measures—not closed sales or buyer-demand proof. Market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $873 per month is a payment standard, not market rent. The effective property-tax rate is 0.73%, and median annual tax is $1,199; insurance, maintenance and actual acquisition costs are not published.

03Demand & competition

Demand indicators warrant restrained interpretation. Tax-return migration was net positive by seven households, yet the record’s average income for inbound movers was $61,613 below that of outbound movers, a calculation from the reported averages. That combination does not establish tenant payment capacity or sustained buyer demand. Investor participation was 6.67% of the 15 purchase mortgages reported; it shows limited observed non-owner competition, not the full buyer mix. Pending-sales counts, vacancy, lease renewal and transaction-volume evidence are not published.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits could change the thesis. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual climate loss is 0.08% of building value; this county-level model is neither a parcel flood determination nor an insurance quote. Underwriting needs parcel flood-zone and insurance terms, rent comps and signed-lease economics, property condition, and recent closed-sale/financing comps. Those absences prevent a defensible yield, debt-service coverage, resale-value or hazard-cost conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Bowman County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Bowman city1.5KScranton city387Rhame city184Gascoyne city28
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

4 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Bowman cityIncorporated place
    1,499
  2. 02
    Scranton cityIncorporated place
    387
  3. 03
    Rhame cityIncorporated place
    184
  4. 04
    Gascoyne cityIncorporated place
    28

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.082% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.73%

$1,199 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+7

47 in · 40 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$61,613

$62,787 arriving · $124,400 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.7%

1 of 15 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings11▲ 10.5% year over year
Median days on market21▼ 56.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced7.4%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 30.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market rent, vacancy and lease evidence are absent, so income underwriting may not support the value signal.
  2. Thin MLS inventory and no closed-sale or transaction-volume evidence may leave exit pricing unverified.
  3. Parcel flood exposure, insurance terms and property condition may differ materially from county-level modeled hazard loss.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard rather than market rent.

What does the QCEW employment measure represent?

It is annual covered employment at workplaces in Bowman County, not resident employment or an unemployment measure.

Do the migration data show that higher-income households are moving in?

No. The reported average income of inbound movers is lower than that of outbound movers.