Counties / Iowa / Buena Vista County

Buena Vista County, IA

FIPS 19021 · population 20,753 · outside every metro area

$192k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$192k
▲ 1.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$894
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,010
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+48.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.4%FHFA HPI2025+7.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$160k
Surveyed gross rent$894
Rent burden 30%+29.9%
Median year built1964
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
9.0%vacant
8,293estimated housing units
Occupied tenure26.8% renter
owner 73.2%renter 26.8%
Structure mix80.1% single-family
Single-family 80.1%20+ units 3.6%Mobile home 2.3%Other 14.1%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs10,290▼ 3.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments596annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,067▲ 3.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing39.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−3.7%WEEKLY WAGE+3.0%Manufacturing39.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

The decision tension is a modest current county-value gain beside a much stronger, differently measured appreciation signal, while rent is unavailable. Buena Vista County merits investigation by buyers able to verify lease economics and flood costs; those needing a pre-screened yield should be cautious. Zillow’s county median home value was $191,650 in 2026-06, up 1.35% year over year. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 7.29% in its 2025 annual observation. Those are not the same period or method and should not be averaged or treated as a sale-price forecast.

02Housing economics

There is no published median asking market rent, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $1,010 FMR is a payment standard, not an estimate of market asking rent, and cannot substitute for it. Carrying costs deserve direct review: the effective property-tax rate is 1.21%, while median annual tax is $1,931; neither establishes a bill for a specific asset. The modeled annual climate-loss ratio is 0.11% of building value and aligns with inland flood as the dominant hazard, but it is not a parcel loss estimate.

03Demand & competition

Demand and competition look mixed rather than proven. Tax-return migration shows net outflow of 141 households, and the average income of movers in was $1,766 lower than movers out; this is migration evidence, not a measure of tenant demand. Investors made 19 of 165 recorded purchases, or 11.52%, which indicates some non-owner participation but not bidding intensity or all-cash competition. QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces fell 3.68%; Manufacturing, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounts for 39.67% of private covered employment. These facts justify employer and tenant-segment checks, not an unemployment or resident-job conclusion.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits remain material because county aggregates cannot price a building. Obtain market asking rents, executed leases, vacancy and operating-expense history before setting income; their absence prevents a gross-yield conclusion. Obtain MLS listing-price, active-listing, days-on-market, and price-reduction data before judging visible supply or seller concessions. For any target parcel, verify flood zone, elevation, prior loss history, insurance terms, condition, and its tax bill; without them, the climate model and county tax measures cannot determine property-level carrying cost.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Buena Vista County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Storm Lake city11.4KAlta city2.3KNewell city944Albert City city722Sioux Rapids city722Lakeside city563Marathon city234Linn Grove city215
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

10 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Storm Lake cityIncorporated place
    11,428
  2. 02
    Alta cityIncorporated place
    2,250
  3. 03
    Newell cityIncorporated place
    944
  4. 04
    Albert City cityIncorporated place
    722
  5. 05
    Sioux Rapids cityIncorporated place
    722
  6. 06
    Lakeside cityIncorporated place
    563
  7. 07
    Marathon cityIncorporated place
    234
  8. 08
    Linn Grove cityIncorporated place
    215
  9. 09
    Truesdale cityIncorporated place
    187
  10. 10
    Rembrandt cityIncorporated place
    157

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.110% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.21%

$1,931 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-141

476 in · 617 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$1,766

$43,811 arriving · $45,577 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors11.5%

19 of 165 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Achievable rent and occupancy could be insufficient once leases, vacancy, and expenses are known.
  2. Parcel flood exposure or insurance cost could differ materially from the county-level model.
  3. Workplace covered-employment weakness and net outmigration could narrow tenant or buyer depth.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the record?

No. Median asking market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used as market rent.

What does the record show about investor participation?

Investors made 19 of 165 recorded purchases, representing 11.52% of purchases.

What is the stated climate risk measure?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with a modeled annual climate-loss ratio of 0.11% of building value.