States / Iowa
State rental intelligence

Iowa rental market data

A source-traced view across 14 metro markets and 99 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

10/14 metros scored99/99 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro52.5out of 100 · 10 measured metros
Iowa identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$216kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,040monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield5.7%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.3%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Iowa rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,0202026-07 · ▲ 1.8% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index6.7%2026-07 · +0.0 pp in 12 months
Time on marketn/anot published for this state
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,514$1,144$774Rental Vacancy Index8.2%5.8%3.4%2017-012021-102026-07IowaUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rents rose 1.8% with vacancy near 6.7%, even as the median measured metro lost jobs and aggregate migration across 99 counties was negative, making local demand proof the central Iowa screen.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Iowa's Apartment List recent-lease rent reached $1,020 in July 2026, up 1.8% from $1,002 a year earlier. The separate Vacancy Index was 6.7% in both periods when rounded, so rent gains did not come with a measured decline in vacancy. State rent growth was 2.9 percentage points above the national series, a genuine counter-signal to the softer employment and migration evidence.

Across 14 measured metros, year-over-year employment growth had a median of -0.3%. IRS data covering all 99 counties recorded net migration of -2,381, or -0.7 people per 1,000 residents, although mover income produced a positive $100,365 aggregate balance. The combination supports property-level screening rather than a uniform state conclusion: verify local jobs and tenant depth, separate current leasing conditions from resale liquidity, and stress operating costs. The packet cannot establish future rents, in-place lease performance, state rental listing time, parcel-level hazard exposure or insurance cost.

01

1.8% recent-lease rent growth with vacancy still near 6.7% → underwrite modest current pricing support without assuming tightening occupancy

02

-0.3% median metro job growth and net migration of -2,381 → require submarket-specific evidence of tenant demand

03

Cedar Rapids rent growth of 12.5% versus 3.8% value growth, but Davenport rent growth of 4.4% versus 5.2% value growth → do not apply one momentum assumption across metros

04

Fort Madison at 73 days on market and a 94.9% sale-to-list ratio → use conservative resale timing and proceeds in slower measured markets

05

83.9% median county single-family share and 2.3% large-multifamily share → screen product fit and tenant depth separately from headline vacancy

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Rent gains survived without a lower vacancy rate

The July 2026 Apartment List state rent was $1,020, compared with $1,002 in July 2025, a 1.8% increase. The state Vacancy Index was 6.7% in both periods when rounded. National rent growth was -1.1%, leaving Iowa's state growth rate 2.9 percentage points higher.

This is the clearest positive demand signal in the packet, but it measures recent lease transactions rather than every occupied unit or every locality. Vacancy is a separate Apartment List measure and should not be blended with Census vacancy. The packet also provides no Iowa time-on-market figure, so it cannot show whether state rental listings leased faster or slower.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Employment and household movement

Out-migration and job softness conflict with a positive mover-income balance

Year-over-year employment growth across 14 measured metros had a median of -0.3%, with the 10th-to-90th percentile running from -2.1% to 0.7%. IRS records covering 99 counties showed 2,381 more movers leaving than entering, equal to net migration of -0.7 per 1,000 residents.

The counter-signals matter. Aggregate income associated with incoming movers exceeded outgoing mover income by $100,365, while employment grew 1.4% in Burlington and 0.8% in Marshalltown. Negative aggregate migration therefore does not establish weak demand in every measured market, but the positive income balance also does not prove that movers became renters or that tenant demand will persist.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Price and rent momentum

Cedar Rapids breaks sharply from the measured rent-price lag

The median Zillow home-value increase was 3.7% across 14 measured metros, while the median asking-rent increase was 3.0% across the 10 metros with year-over-year rent data. The packet's calculated rent-minus-price difference was -0.7 percentage points. Because coverage differs, that spread is a screening indicator rather than a matched statewide return measure.

Local results diverged. Cedar Rapids asking rent rose 12.5% while home value rose 3.8%; Iowa City recorded 5.0% rent growth and 3.9% value growth. Davenport moved the other way, with rent up 4.4% and value up 5.2%. Underwriting based on the measured metro median would miss both the unusually strong Cedar Rapids rent reading and Davenport's relative rent lag.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

04
Supply and resale conditions

Tight median inventory masks slow exits in smaller metros

Across 14 measured metros, median for-sale supply was 2.0 months and median marketing time was 31.5 days. The 10th-to-90th percentile ranged from 1.5 to 3.6 months of supply and from 17.9 to 60.1 days on market. A median 32.2% of listings had price drops, showing that limited inventory did not eliminate seller concessions.

Iowa City combined 8.4 permits per 1,000 residents with 2.2 months of supply and 36 days on market. Exit conditions were materially slower in Fort Madison, at 73 days, 4.0 months of supply and a 94.9% sale-to-list ratio. Mason City had 61 days and 4.6 months of supply, while Burlington had 58 days and a 94.0% sale-to-list ratio. These observations support market-specific resale assumptions; they do not establish the liquidity of any particular property.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Predominantly single-family stock coexists with county vacancy extremes

Across all 99 counties, the median ACS vacancy rate was 9.5%, the median renter share was 23.5%, and the median single-family share was 83.9%. Large multifamily buildings accounted for a median of only 2.3% of housing. These are county housing-stock measures, not the current Apartment List rental Vacancy Index.

Measured ACS vacancy reached 37.7% in Dickinson County, 29.1% in Ringgold County and 23.3% in Allamakee County. Those figures do not identify units available to long-term renters. Johnson County presents a different screen: renters were 40.6% of households, vacancy was 7.2%, and 56.2% of renters met the 30%-plus rent-burden threshold. Product type, tenure and affordability therefore need separate local checks.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

Modeled loss and property-tax burdens peak in different counties

Across 99 counties, the median FEMA modeled loss ratio was 0.13%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 0.11% to 0.19%. The median effective property-tax rate was 1.32%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 1.10% to 1.52%. Named high-loss counties included Clay at 0.27%, Van Buren at 0.25% and Floyd at 0.24%. Clay's tax rate was 1.15%, while Union County combined a higher 1.80% tax rate with a lower 0.11% modeled loss ratio.

Inland flood was the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for all 99 counties. That classification does not mean every parcel has inland-flood exposure, nor does it distinguish risk within a county. Tax and modeled loss should be screened independently, followed by parcel, policy and insurance review that this packet cannot provide.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Iowa

The distribution uses 12 current published ZIP reports across 9 cities and 7 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$780$1,658full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income19.3%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 2.7%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered68,212across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.50263$1,65850266$1,38050265$1,32650613$1,26452302$1,26452402$1,25650309$1,24252240$1,23450010$1,21050315$1,09950310$1,02352807$780
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.64.1%55.6%47.1%38.6%30.1%502665224050010503095240250315506135026550310528075026352302Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.4.9%3.9%3.0%2.0%1.1%502665224050010503095240250315506135026550310528075026352302Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within Iowa’s current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, the latest Zillow ZORI asking-rent index runs from $780 to $1,658, versus a $1,249 median. That $878 spread makes a state midpoint a weak stand-in for a location-specific search: Davenport’s 52807 marks the low end, while Waukee’s 50263 marks the high end. The practical question is therefore not simply whether asking rents are high statewide, but how a prospective renter’s budget, income, and tolerance for changing rents align with the particular reported ZIP. This is a distribution of current published direct-evidence reports, not every Iowa ZIP, neighborhood, listing, signed lease, or rental property.

Affordability and renter burden answer different questions. The current asking-rent-to-income calculation—ZORI asking rent divided by ACS median household income—ranges from 12.9% to 28.0%, with a 19.3% median. Iowa City’s result is at the high end of that ratio, whereas Waukee’s is 19.4% despite sitting at the distribution’s high asking-rent end. The ACS five-year share of renter households paying 30% or more of income toward rent instead ranges from 32.6% to 61.6%, with a 45.8% median; Iowa City is also the upper endpoint. This burden measure describes surveyed households and their gross-rent circumstances, while the ratio applies a current asking-rent index to area median income. They can move differently and should not be treated as the same affordability test. ACS results are ZCTA estimates, and ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than identical USPS delivery ZIPs.

Rent momentum and instability also require separate reads because both are derived here only from the direct monthly Zillow series. The median annualized one-year change is 2.7%, but reports range from 0.9% in Cedar Falls to 11.6% in Cedar Rapids; half the histories are classified accelerating. Annualized volatility has a 2.8% median and a 2.1%3.9% range. Thus Cedar Rapids’ fastest recent rise coincides with 3.3% volatility but not the maximum variability: West Des Moines 50265 has the high end of volatility despite 1.4% one-year growth. Davenport recorded the deepest historical maximum drawdown, 8.2%, underscoring that a recent growth rate does not summarize its entire monthly path. These are historical descriptions, not projections.

HUD supplies a different reference point: the administrative two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR benchmark ranges from $956 to $1,590 across these reports. Current ZORI asking rent as a share of that benchmark ranges from 68.2% to 132.2%, and the median is 107.7%. This comparison can flag where the two measures are far apart, but it does not establish a prevailing lease price or a renter’s eligibility. HUD’s bedroom-specific standard is not an observed asking-rent measure, and it is not matched to a particular property’s size, condition, lease terms, utilities, or availability. The evidence likewise has no property-level listings or transactions, so it cannot determine what any individual home will ask or rent for.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 12 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
50266West Des Moines$1,380▲ 2.3%19.0%39.4%2.1%▲ 86.8%
52240Iowa City$1,234▲ 2.6%28.0%61.6%3.2%▲ 117.3%
50010Ames$1,210▲ 7.0%22.2%46.2%2.1%▲ 111.0%
50309Des Moines$1,242▲ 1.7%26.3%37.5%2.8%▲ 90.7%
52402Cedar Rapids$1,256▲ 11.6%20.5%43.3%3.3%▲ 131.4%
50315Des Moines$1,099▲ 2.3%21.8%48.1%2.4%▲ 89.3%
50613Cedar Falls$1,264▲ 0.9%19.3%54.9%2.9%▲ 120.3%
50265West Des Moines$1,326▲ 1.4%18.5%45.4%3.9%▲ 104.4%
50310Des Moines$1,023▲ 5.5%16.1%46.4%2.3%▲ 79.9%
52807Davenport$780▲ 4.8%12.9%45.1%3.1%▲ 68.2%
50263Waukee$1,658▲ 2.8%19.4%32.6%2.4%▲ 111.3%
52302Marion$1,264▲ 8.9%17.2%49.9%3.2%▲ 132.2%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index rather than a record of signed rents. Its ZIP reports describe the current published direct-evidence set; the state distribution is not a census of every USPS ZIP, neighborhood, listing, lease, or rental property.

ACS values are 2024 five-year estimates tabulated for ZCTAs, which are statistical geographies and do not exactly equal USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR values are administrative two-bedroom benchmarks; neither source should be substituted for current property-specific asking rent.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Iowa

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-2.1%-0.3%0.7%Net migration / 1k-0.7Net household movement-2,381
Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change1.9%3.7%5.3%Asking-rent change1.3%3.0%5.7%Rent minus price-0.7%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k1.02.67.6Months of supply1.5×1.9×3.6×Days on market18 days32 days60 daysListings with cuts19.0%32.2%43.0%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution10 scored metros · median 52.5
00–19120–39740–59260–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
25%25/99Rent100%99/99Climate100%99/99Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Burlington8.3%Sioux City6.7%Clinton6.2%Davenport6.2%Cedar Rapids6.2%Fort Madison6.2%Waterloo5.9%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Iowa

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Marshalltown, IA66$197k$8705.3%▲ 0.8%
2Davenport, IA61$198k$1,0196.2%▼ 0.5%
3Cedar Rapids, IA59$248k$1,2746.2%▼ 2.1%
4Omaha, NE58$312k$1,4445.5%▲ 0.5%
5Iowa City, IA55$304k$1,3775.4%▲ 0.1%
6Des Moines, IA50$297k$1,3105.3%▼ 0.5%
7Waterloo, IA50$202k$9965.9%▼ 2.2%
8Ames, IA47$283k$1,0604.5%▼ 2.0%
9Dubuque, IA42$283k$1,1324.8%▼ 1.8%
10Sioux City, IA39$227k$1,2636.7%▼ 1.0%

Showing the top 10 scored metros of 14. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Iowa

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Polk County, IA503,175$284k$1,2595.3%inland flooding
Linn County, IA230,004$243k$1,2816.3%inland flooding
Scott County, IA174,608$254k$1,0555.0%inland flooding
Johnson County, IA156,639$314k$1,3835.3%inland flooding
Black Hawk County, IA131,049$190k$1,0116.4%inland flooding
Dallas County, IA107,968$356k$1,5465.2%inland flooding
Woodbury County, IA106,247$210k$1,2167.0%inland flooding
Story County, IA100,466$298k$1,1424.6%inland flooding
Dubuque County, IA99,030$283k$1,1324.8%inland flooding
Pottawattamie County, IA93,424$245k$1,3566.7%inland flooding
Warren County, IA54,409$327k$1,1894.4%inland flooding
Clinton County, IA46,268$182k$9436.2%inland flooding
County yield sample25/99counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−2,381IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share9.3%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. The positive state rent reading covers recent lease transactions and may not represent in-place leases, every property type or every Iowa locality.
  2. Soft median employment and negative net migration may undermine the rent thesis where local tenant demand is not independently verified.
  3. Year-over-year Zillow rent data cover 10 of 14 measured metros and 13 of 25 counties with rent observations, limiting geographic generalization.
  4. County Realtor listing measures cover 67 of 99 counties, and the packet has no county listing-price observations, leaving important exit-market gaps.
  5. ACS vacancy includes the broader housing stock, while FEMA's county leading-hazard label cannot identify parcel exposure; treating either as property-level evidence would misstate risk.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Is Iowa's positive state rent growth enough to underwrite rent increases?

No. Apartment List recent-lease rent rose 1.8% and vacancy remained near 6.7%, but the series does not cover every locality or establish future increases.

Where is the clearest measured separation between rent and home-value momentum?

Cedar Rapids, where asking rent rose 12.5% and home value rose 3.8%. Davenport was a counterexample, with rent up 4.4% and value up 5.2%.

Which measured metros call for more conservative exit assumptions?

Fort Madison recorded 73 days on market, 4.0 months of supply and a 94.9% sale-to-list ratio. Mason City had 61 days and 4.6 months of supply, while Burlington had 58 days and a 94.0% sale-to-list ratio.

Does negative aggregate migration mean employment weakened everywhere?

No. Net migration across 99 counties was -2,381 and median metro job growth was -0.3%, but Burlington employment grew 1.4% and Marshalltown grew 0.8%.

Can the county hazard label determine whether a property needs flood coverage?

No. Inland flood is each county's mutually exclusive leading-hazard label, not a parcel exposure determination or an insurance recommendation.