Counties / Wisconsin / Burnett County

Burnett County, WI

FIPS 55013 · population 16,916 · outside every metro area

$300k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$300k
▲ 2.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$771
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$974
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+71.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.6%FHFA HPI2025+6.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$231k
Surveyed gross rent$771
Rent burden 30%+43.4%
Median year built1983
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
53.3%vacant
15,396estimated housing units
Occupied tenure14.1% renter
owner 85.9%renter 14.1%
Structure mix87.2% single-family
Single-family 87.2%20+ units 0.6%Mobile home 8.9%Other 3.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs5,209▲ 2.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments485annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$898▲ 5.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing24.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+2.7%WEEKLY WAGE+5.4%Manufacturing24.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Burnett County’s decision tension is a rising county price backdrop against visible seller concessions and an untested cash-flow case. In 2026-06, Zillow reported a $300,351 median home value. Separately, FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI increased 6.43% year over year and 71.23% cumulatively over five years. FHFA is an appreciation index, not a home value, and its different method and vintage cannot be combined with Zillow into one growth rate. Rent-dependent underwriting therefore merits caution until property-level lease evidence is obtained.

02Housing economics

The Zillow value cannot be paired with a published market rent, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $974 per month, but it is a payment standard rather than evidence of asking rent. A 0.93% effective property-tax rate and $2,140 median annual tax provide carrying-cost inputs, but not operating expenses, insurance, or net income. Inland flood is the dominant hazard; modeled expected building-value loss is 0.11% annually. This county-level model does not determine a parcel’s flood zone, insurance availability, premium, or deductible.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS listing evidence is mixed rather than a closed-sale demand reading: 106 active listings, a 50-day median marketing time, 17.5% of listings reduced, and a 40.09% pending-to-active ratio. Active listings are visible supply; the median listing price is an asking price, and pending counts do not establish buyer demand or executed values. The reductions and marketing time require local comparable-listing, contract, and sale review before treating the price measures as executable acquisition evidence.

04Risk & next checks

Tax-return migration records show positive net migration and higher average income for inbound than outbound moving households, but neither measure identifies tenants or lease demand. Non-occupants accounted for 19 of 238 purchase mortgages, a 7.98% share, indicating some non-owner participation without showing their asset types or rents. QCEW identifies Manufacturing as the largest disclosed private supersector among covered county workplaces; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Missing lease comps, vacancy, concessions, closed sales, flood maps, insurance quotes, and property operating statements prevent a tested cash-flow, resale, and hazard conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Burnett County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Grantsburg village1.3KSiren village713Webster village575Danbury CDP73
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

4 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Grantsburg villageIncorporated place
    1,340
  2. 02
    Siren villageIncorporated place
    713
  3. 03
    Webster villageIncorporated place
    575
  4. 04
    Danbury CDPCensus-designated place
    73

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.105% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.92%

$2,140 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+83

492 in · 409 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$40,354

$94,689 arriving · $54,335 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.0%

19 of 238 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings106▼ 6.2% year over year
Median days on market50▲ 21.9% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.5%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 17.5% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Published rent, vacancy, and operating-cost evidence is absent, so cash flow may not support the value reference.
  2. County modeled flood loss cannot identify parcel flood exposure, insurance pricing, or availability.
  3. MLS conditions measure listings rather than closed sales, so executable values and buyer depth remain unverified.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. County market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be substituted for market rent.

What evidence of seller concessions is available?

Realtor.com reports that 17.5% of active MLS listings had price reductions, with a 50-day median marketing time.

How much non-owner purchase-mortgage activity is reported?

Non-occupants accounted for 19 of 238 purchase mortgages, or 7.98%.