Counties / Nebraska / Cheyenne County

Cheyenne County, NE

FIPS 31033 · population 9,533 · outside every metro area

$178k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$178k
▲ 6.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$821
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,086
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+48.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.8%FHFA HPI2025−2.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$140k
Surveyed gross rent$821
Rent burden 30%+42.7%
Median year built1957
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.7%vacant
4,888estimated housing units
Occupied tenure33.3% renter
owner 66.7%renter 33.3%
Structure mix76.7% single-family
Single-family 76.7%20+ units 4.4%Mobile home 4.8%Other 14.1%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs3,963▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments338annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$942▲ 2.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities32.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+2.1%Trade, transportation, and utilities32.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Cheyenne County’s decision tension is valuation: Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $178,114, up 6.8%, while the 2025 FHFA repeat-transaction HPI fell 2.35%. Income-focused buyers should be cautious, and valuation-led buyers should investigate why those signals diverge before setting an acquisition basis. The Zillow observation is a home-value measure; FHFA is an index built from repeat transactions. Their different methods and vintages cannot be averaged into one appreciation rate.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unverified. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be calculated. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,086 per month is a payment standard, not an estimate of county asking rent, and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 1.65%, with median annual tax of $2,301; these county measures flag carrying-cost review but do not establish the tax bill on any target property. Obtain lease comparables, rent rolls, property-specific assessments and operating costs before testing cash flow.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is narrow. In the 2025 QCEW annual average, covered workplace employment rose 0.58%, and covered workers averaged $942 weekly. Trade, transportation, and utilities—the largest disclosed private supersector—accounted for 32.20% of private covered jobs, concentrating disclosed employment exposure. This is workplace coverage, not resident employment, unemployment or a forecast. Tax-return migration was nearly balanced, although inbound movers' average AGI exceeded that of outbound movers by $1,403. Investor participation was 14.29% against 91 total purchases, indicating a present non-owner share but not proving demand or competition intensity. No Realtor.com MLS listing price, active-listing, marketing-time or price-reduction figures are published, so visible supply and seller-concession evidence are unavailable.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual climate loss ratio is 0.20% of building value. That model is not a parcel loss estimate; flood zone, elevation, prior claims, insurance availability and deductibles need verification. The combined record does not support a rent-based return conclusion or a closed-sale-demand conclusion: market rent and MLS evidence are absent, while price measures conflict. Next checks are parcel-level hazard and insurance review, current lease comps, property taxes, condition, and closed-sale comparables.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Cheyenne County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Sidney city6.4KDalton village435Potter village283Lodgepole village223Gurley village207Sunol CDP123Lorenzo CDP12
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Sidney cityIncorporated place
    6,419
  2. 02
    Dalton villageIncorporated place
    435
  3. 03
    Potter villageIncorporated place
    283
  4. 04
    Lodgepole villageIncorporated place
    223
  5. 05
    Gurley villageIncorporated place
    207
  6. 06
    Sunol CDPCensus-designated place
    123
  7. 07
    Lorenzo CDPCensus-designated place
    12

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.203% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.65%

$2,301 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+1

250 in · 249 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$1,403

$46,760 arriving · $45,357 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors14.3%

13 of 91 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Target-property rent, vacancy and operating costs may differ materially from the unavailable county market-rent evidence.
  2. The divergent Zillow and FHFA measures may not bracket a target property's transaction value.
  3. Parcel-level flood exposure and insurance terms may differ materially from the county modeled loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the county record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than asking rent.

What does the buyer data establish about investor competition?

It establishes a non-owner mortgage share of 14.29% alongside 91 total purchases, but not bidding pressure or buyer demand.

What hazard requires property-level screening?

Inland flood. The published climate-loss measure is county modeled evidence, not a parcel-specific loss estimate.