Counties / Minnesota / Chippewa County

Chippewa County, MN

FIPS 27023 · population 12,377 · outside every metro area

$224k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$224k
▲ 9.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$869
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+64.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+9.1%FHFA HPI2025+11.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$156k
Surveyed gross rent$869
Rent burden 30%+43.2%
Median year built1957
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
9.4%vacant
5,661estimated housing units
Occupied tenure27.7% renter
owner 72.3%renter 27.7%
Structure mix80.3% single-family
Single-family 80.3%20+ units 8.3%Mobile home 2.5%Other 8.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs5,135▼ 2.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments417annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,056▲ 3.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities23.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−2.9%WEEKLY WAGE+3.7%Trade, transportation, and utilities23.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Chippewa County presents a price-momentum-versus-demand-quality tension: investors able to verify tenancy and flood costs should investigate, while yield-first or leverage-sensitive cases warrant caution. Zillow’s 2026-06 median home value is $223,979, up 9.08% year over year. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 11.38% on its annual measure. These readings support an upward direction, but their vintages and methods differ; FHFA is not a home value, and the rates should not be blended.

02Housing economics

Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed from the value measure. HUD’s $973 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot fill that gap. The 1.10% effective property-tax rate is a carrying-cost input, and the published median annual tax is $1,711. Without market-rent evidence, county-level underwriting cannot test whether rent supports the entry value and tax burden.

03Demand & competition

Annual 2025 QCEW shows 5,135 covered jobs at county workplaces, down 2.93%, while the average weekly covered-worker wage rose 3.73%. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not a description of the whole county economy. Net tax-return migration was negative by 80 households, and incoming movers’ average AGI was calculated at $10,528 below outbound movers’ average. Non-occupants represented 1.82% of 110 purchase mortgages: a limited buyer-competition signal, not proof of broader demand.

04Risk & next checks

The modeled annual expected climate-loss ratio is 0.16% of building value, consistent with the stated inland-flood hazard, but it is not a parcel-specific loss estimate. Market-rent comparables, lease and occupancy history, insurance terms, flood elevation and drainage evidence, and transaction comparables remain necessary. Realtor.com listing-market figures are not published in this record, preventing an assessment of MLS asking prices, visible supply, marketing time, or seller price reductions.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Chippewa County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Montevideo city5.3KGranite Falls city*2.7KClara City city1.5KRaymond city*692Milan city564Maynard city234Watson city200
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Montevideo cityIncorporated place
    5,315
  2. 02
    Granite Falls cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    2,685
  3. 03
    Clara City cityIncorporated place
    1,466
  4. 04
    Raymond cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    692
  5. 05
    Milan cityIncorporated place
    564
  6. 06
    Maynard cityIncorporated place
    234
  7. 07
    Watson cityIncorporated place
    200

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.162% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.10%

$1,711 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-80

236 in · 316 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$10,528

$46,975 arriving · $57,503 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors1.8%

2 of 110 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Published price growth may not translate into sufficient market rent because no county rent measure is available.
  2. Contracting covered employment and negative tax-return migration may weaken the demand assumptions behind the price thesis.
  3. Flood-related insurance, mitigation, or location conditions may materially differ by parcel from the county-level model.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is a market-rent gross yield available from this record?

No. County market rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent cannot be substituted because it is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

What does the labor evidence measure?

QCEW measures annual covered employment at workplaces in the county and average weekly wages for covered workers; it does not measure resident employment or unemployment.

What hazard requires site-level diligence?

Inland flood is the stated dominant hazard. The record provides a modeled county-level climate-loss ratio, not a parcel-specific flood-loss estimate.