Counties / Oklahoma / Dewey County

Dewey County, OK

FIPS 40043 · population 4,360 · outside every metro area

$141k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$141k
▲ 2.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$912
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$955
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.7%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$134k
Surveyed gross rent$912
Rent burden 30%+36.5%
Median year built1974
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
25.3%vacant
2,184estimated housing units
Occupied tenure23.6% renter
owner 76.4%renter 23.6%
Structure mix77.2% single-family
Single-family 77.2%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 21.2%Other 1.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,264▲ 8.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments186annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,481▲ 11.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorNatural resources and mining48.9% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+8.7%WEEKLY WAGE+11.1%Natural resources and mining48.9%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Dewey County's screening tension is a $141,182 Zillow median home value rising 2.69% year over year against an income-property case that cannot yet be tested: measured market rent is not published, and migration is negative. The record suits a cautious buyer willing to investigate a specific property, not an investor assuming a county-level yield story. The decision should turn on property-level rent, flood, and condition checks rather than the headline price.

02Housing economics

Zillow's June 2026 figure is a county median home value, not market rent or an FHFA repeat-transaction index. With market rent absent, gross yield cannot be computed, and price-to-rent support or cash flow cannot be established. HUD's $955 monthly FMR is a payment standard, not market asking rent; substituting it would be invalid. The effective property-tax rate is 0.52%, with median annual tax of $689. Missing insurance, repairs, vacancy, utilities, financing, and purchase-specific assessment prevent a net-return conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Demand is mixed but locally grounded. QCEW's 2025 covered jobs totaled 2,264, while average covered weekly wage rose 11.10%; these are workplace measures, not resident employment or unemployment. Natural resources and mining represented 48.89% of total private covered jobs, making the disclosed base concentrated rather than a whole-economy measure. Tax-return movers show 83 in and 102 out, a net loss of 19; average AGI was $52,181 inbound versus $45,402 outbound. Higher inbound mover income does not erase the outflow. Investors were 2 of 24 purchase mortgages, or 8.33%: limited observed participation, but not proof of demand or competition.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material. Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.35% of building value expected to be lost per year, not a property-specific dollar loss. Obtain flood-zone and elevation data, an insurance quote with deductibles, drainage details, and a condition/capex review. Realtor.com MLS metrics for June 2026 are not published, blocking asking-price, visible-supply, marketing-time, and concession analysis. FHFA's repeat-transaction HPI is absent, so Zillow's direction cannot be confirmed or challenged. This supports screening, not a rent, resale, or risk-adjusted return conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Dewey County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Seiling city*824Vici town725Leedey town406Taloga town327Camargo town134Oakwood town52Fay CDP51Putnam town51
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

8 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Seiling cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    824
  2. 02
    Vici townIncorporated place
    725
  3. 03
    Leedey townIncorporated place
    406
  4. 04
    Taloga townIncorporated place
    327
  5. 05
    Camargo townIncorporated place
    134
  6. 06
    Oakwood townIncorporated place
    52
  7. 07
    Fay CDPCensus-designated place
    51
  8. 08
    Putnam townIncorporated place
    51

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.350% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.52%

$689 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-19

83 in · 102 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$6,779

$52,181 arriving · $45,402 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.3%

2 of 24 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market rent is not published, so gross yield, cash flow, and price-to-rent support cannot be underwritten.
  2. Inland flood exposure lacks property-level flood, insurance, elevation, drainage, and condition evidence, leaving carrying costs and loss risk unresolved.
  3. Net outmigration, concentrated natural-resources employment, absent MLS evidence, and a small purchase sample leave demand breadth and resale positioning unverified.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross rental yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and the HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

What does the labor and migration evidence say about demand?

Covered jobs and wages provide local income support, but tax-return migration is a net outflow and the disclosed employment base is concentrated in natural resources and mining.

Does the climate figure quantify this property's annual dollar loss?

No. It is a modeled percentage of building value, and the record identifies inland flood as the dominant hazard without providing a property-specific dollar loss.