States / Oklahoma
State rental intelligence

Oklahoma rental market data

A source-traced view across 18 metro markets and 77 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

14/18 metros scored77/77 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro46.5out of 100 · 14 measured metros
Oklahoma identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$185kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,183monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield7.5%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.6%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Oklahoma rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,0182026-07 · ▲ 0.7% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index5.8%2026-07 · −0.3 pp in 12 months
Time on market21 days2026-07 · 0 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,527$1,089$651Rental Vacancy Index9.4%6.1%2.8%2017-012021-102026-07OklahomaUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rent rose and rental vacancy tightened even as the median measured metro posted negative job growth, making local demand validation Oklahoma's defining rental screen.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Oklahoma's state rental indicators were supportive but not uniformly stronger: recent-lease rent rose 0.7%, the separate Vacancy Index fell 0.3 percentage points, and rental time on market was unchanged. The counter-signal is employment: year-over-year job growth across 18 measured metros had a median of -0.6%. Positive net migration of 1.4 people per 1,000 residents provides some offset, but it comes from an earlier measurement period and does not establish current tenant demand.

The practical screen is local rather than statewide. Asking-rent growth exceeded home-value growth in the measured metro middle, yet resale time, inventory, housing stock and physical risk varied substantially. Coverage also has limits: metro rent growth is available for 14 of 18 metros. The packet cannot establish achievable rent for a particular unit, net operating returns, property condition, insurance cost, parcel-level hazard exposure or future performance.

01

State recent-lease rent rose 0.7% while the Vacancy Index fell 0.3 percentage points → the state rental backdrop is supportive, but it is not a substitute for local lease evidence

02

Median measured metro asking-rent growth of 5.2% exceeded median home-value growth of 3.9% → rent-to-price screening merits attention where current comps confirm the asking-rent series

03

Median metro job growth was -0.6% while net migration was 1.4 per 1,000 residents → demand evidence is mixed and should be checked against local employers and tenant sources

04

Metro resale time ranged from 21.7 to 77.3 days between the 10th and 90th percentiles → exit liquidity assumptions should be set by market rather than by a state average

05

Inland flood was the leading FEMA hazard label in 72 counties → parcel exposure and insurance terms need verification even though the county label itself is not an exposure finding

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Recent-lease vacancy tightened without faster leasing

Apartment List's Oklahoma recent-lease rent was $1,018 in July 2026, up from $1,011 a year earlier, or 0.7%. Its separate Vacancy Index declined from 6.1% to 5.8%, while its separate time-on-market series held at 21.3 days.

The national context strengthens the state-level signal: Oklahoma's rent growth was 1.8 percentage points higher, vacancy was 1.4 percentage points lower, and time on market was 8.7 days shorter. Still, unchanged leasing time tempers the tightening interpretation. These measures support a state-level leasing backdrop, not a conclusion about any metro or property, and they should not be blended with Zillow asking rent or ACS housing vacancy.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Employment and household movement

Job weakness is the central counter-signal

Across 18 measured metros, year-over-year employment growth had a median of -0.6%, with the 10th-to-90th-percentile range running from -2.5% to 0.3%. The weakness was not universal: Tahlequah recorded 2.0% growth, Ponca City 0.6% and Tulsa 0.1%.

Household movement provides a counterweight. The IRS series reported net migration of 5,624 people across 76 counties, equal to 1.4 per 1,000 state residents. However, those migration data cover 2022-2023, while the employment and rental readings are more recent. They cannot establish that migration is offsetting current payroll weakness, so employer and tenant-pool checks remain essential at the local level.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Price and rent momentum

Asking rents are outrunning values in the measured metro middle

Zillow asking-rent growth across 14 measured metros had a median of 5.2%, with a 2.6% to 12.9% 10th-to-90th-percentile range. Home-value growth across 18 metros had a lower median of 3.9% and a narrower 0.5% to 5.9% range. The supplied difference between the two medians is 1.4 percentage points, but the coverage counts differ.

The separation was pronounced in Muskogee, where asking rent rose 16.1% and value rose 2.1%; Tahlequah, at 13.7% and 8.4%; and Ponca City, at 10.9% and 3.6%. Their indicated gross yields were 7.4%, 6.7% and 8.2%, respectively. These are asking-rent-to-value screens, not net returns or recent-lease growth, and the employment evidence argues for verifying current rent comps and tenant depth.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

04
Supply and resale conditions

High permit activity coexists with sharply different resale liquidity

Across 18 measured metros, the median resale listing took 44.5 days, but the 10th-to-90th-percentile range was 21.7 to 77.3 days. Median inventory was 3.8 months, with a 2.5-to-5.7-month range, while the median share of listings with price drops was 27.1%.

Woodward stood out at 116 days on market, 5.9 months of supply and a 95.2% sale-to-list ratio. Duncan had 85 days and 6.8 months of supply. Muskogee had 74 days, and 34.9% of listings showed price drops. These readings make exit timing and local comparable-sale depth material parts of screening.

Permit activity does not map cleanly to current resale tightness. Durant recorded 6.9 permitted units per 1,000 residents alongside 5.3 months of supply and 59 days on market; Oklahoma City recorded 5.7 permits per 1,000, 3.0 months and 33 days; Tulsa recorded 4.7 permits per 1,000, 2.4 months and 31 days. Permits are authorizations, not completed units, and do not identify how much future supply will compete for renters.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Older, single-family-heavy stock meets substantial renter burden

Across all 77 counties, the median ACS housing vacancy rate was 17.1%, the renter share was 27.0%, and 42.4% of renters were burdened by housing costs. The median housing stock was 78.1% single-family and only 1.3% large multifamily, with a median year built of 1978. County rent burden ranged from 35.1% at the 10th percentile to 49.9% at the 90th.

Kiowa County had 57.6% renter burden, 26.3% housing vacancy and a 1962 median construction year. Woods County had 57.5% burden, 19.4% vacancy and a 1960 median year, while Payne County had 57.0% burden, 12.0% vacancy and a 1984 median year. These combinations make rent headroom, condition and capital needs important screens. ACS housing vacancy is broader than rental vacancy and cannot be substituted for the Apartment List Vacancy Index.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

Inland flood is the leading county hazard label, not a parcel verdict

FEMA assigns inland flood as the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label in 72 counties, hail in three and strong wind in two. Those counts cover all 77 counties without overlap, but a county's leading label does not show whether a particular parcel is exposed.

The median county climate loss ratio was 0.198%, rising to 0.322% at the 90th percentile. Jackson County measured 1.02%, Coal County 0.529% and Harper County 0.426%. Effective property tax followed a different pattern: the county median was 0.627% and the 90th percentile was 0.845%, while Cleveland County, Canadian County and Oklahoma County measured 1.00%, 0.97% and 0.97%. Hazard, insurance and tax therefore require separate property-level screens.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Oklahoma

The distribution uses 20 current published ZIP reports across 10 cities and 4 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$878$1,874full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income22.3%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 2.6%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered122,585across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.73012$1,87474008$1,84773162$1,66674104$1,61274012$1,60173034$1,55673160$1,50173069$1,45673071$1,35173132$1,22974133$1,16674136$878
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.56.9%51.8%46.7%41.5%36.4%741337413673071740127316073069731327303473162730127400874104Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.4.4%3.4%2.4%1.5%0.5%741337413673071740127316073069731327303473162730127400874104Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

The statewide distribution is limited to 20 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, not a census of every Oklahoma ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property. Within that evidence universe, Zillow’s observed asking-rent index has a $1,478.50 median, ranging from $878 to $1,874—a $996 spread. The practical question is therefore how much location-specific budget room is needed, rather than whether a single statewide rent describes a search. ZIP 74136 anchors the low end in the displayed comparisons, whereas ZIP 73012 anchors the high end. These are market-index observations, useful for comparison across the included reports, not quotes for a particular available home. For budgeting, the midpoint is only a reference across reports, not a typical unit price.

Affordability needs two lenses that should not be collapsed. The current asking-rent-to-median-income measure ranges from 17.0% to 35.4%, with a 22.3% median; it compares ZORI asking rent with area median household income. Separately, ACS five-year ZCTA estimates place the share of renter households paying 30% or more of gross rent between 38.9% and 54.4%, with a 45.2% median. For example, in ZIP 74104, the current index translates to $64,480 required annual income under a 30% rent-share rule, above its $54,691 median household income. The burden statistic is a survey-based household outcome, not a restatement of the current asking-rent ratio. Neither measure describes an individual household’s wages, payment, or eligibility.

Rent momentum is not a synonym for volatility. Direct monthly Zillow series show one-year annualized growth from -0.7% to 7.2%, centered on a 2.6% median. ZIP 74012 marks the high-growth endpoint, while ZIP 74136 shows a -0.6% one-year change. Annualized volatility, however, ranges from 1.5% to 3.4%, with a 2.5% median, so the growth ordering does not fully describe month-to-month variation. Historical maximum drawdown reached -4.2% in ZIP 74133. Use momentum, volatility, and drawdown together as descriptions of the index history; none identifies the rent that a future listing will command. These figures are historical measures, not projections.

HUD’s two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR benchmark is an administrative bedroom standard, not asking rent. Across the included distribution, direct asking rent is 70.2% to 128.2% of that benchmark; ZIP 74136 is below the benchmark and ZIP 73162 is above it. That comparison can frame a bedroom-specific administrative reference, but its gap cannot establish a property’s bedroom match, availability, condition, lease terms, or actual quoted rent. The income, gross-rent, vacancy, and burden measures are ACS five-year estimates for Census ZCTAs, which are statistical areas rather than identical USPS delivery ZIPs. Keep those geographies and measurement systems separate when interpreting a ZIP label. A ZIP label alone does not reconcile those different source geographies.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 20 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
74133Tulsa$1,166▲ 4.0%18.9%44.0%3.4%▲ 77.7%
74136Tulsa$878▼ 0.6%20.3%48.9%3.4%▲ 70.2%
73071Norman$1,351▲ 2.6%25.3%40.4%2.2%▲ 104.7%
74012Broken Arrow$1,601▲ 7.2%23.6%39.4%2.4%▲ 112.7%
73160Moore$1,501▲ 2.6%22.7%43.0%1.5%▲ 112.0%
73069Norman$1,456▲ 6.1%29.7%54.4%2.3%▲ 120.3%
73132Oklahoma City$1,229▼ 0.7%24.4%51.9%2.5%▲ 106.9%
73034Edmond$1,556▲ 1.1%17.0%47.7%2.3%▲ 113.6%
73162Oklahoma City$1,666▲ 2.4%22.7%52.1%3.1%▲ 128.2%
73012Edmond$1,874▲ 1.6%17.8%45.2%1.7%▲ 100.2%
74008Bixby$1,847▲ 0.6%21.3%38.9%3.0%▲ 126.5%
74104Tulsa$1,612▲ 3.8%35.4%49.7%3.3%▲ 111.9%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index rather than a census of signed leases or a property-level quote. The statewide distribution includes only current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, so it excludes unreported ZIPs and does not represent every neighborhood, available unit, or rental property.

ACS 2024 five-year figures are survey estimates reported for Census ZCTAs, which do not perfectly match USPS delivery ZIP geographies. HUD FMR/SAFMR values are administrative two-bedroom standards; differences from ZORI must not be interpreted as like-for-like rents, household outcomes, property quality, or forecasts.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Oklahoma

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-2.5%-0.6%0.3%Net migration / 1k1.4Net household movement5,624
Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change0.5%3.9%5.9%Asking-rent change2.6%5.2%12.9%Rent minus price1.4%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.21.65.0Months of supply2.5×3.8×5.7×Days on market22 days45 days77 daysListings with cuts18.9%27.1%37.4%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution14 scored metros · median 46.5
00–19220–39940–59360–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
35%27/77Rent100%77/77Climate99%76/77Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Woodward13.6%Enid10.5%Altus10.3%Lawton8.6%Duncan8.6%Ponca City8.2%Ardmore8.0%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Oklahoma

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Ponca City, OK76$118k$8018.2%▲ 0.6%
2Tahlequah, OK71$217k$1,2166.7%▲ 2.0%
3Ada, OK61$195k$1,1146.9%▼ 0.6%
4Muskogee, OK57$161k$9917.4%▼ 1.4%
5Tulsa, OK50$256k$1,3616.4%▲ 0.1%
6Lawton, OK47$155k$1,1108.6%▼ 1.5%
7Shawnee, OK47$197k$1,1497.0%▼ 0.5%
8Ardmore, OK46$184k$1,2348.0%▼ 1.2%
9Fort Smith, AR44$208k$1,0476.0%▼ 0.8%
10Stillwater, OK44$248k$1,4016.8%▼ 1.1%
11Durant, OK43$231k$1,4797.7%▼ 0.1%
12Enid, OK40$144k$1,26610.5%▼ 0.6%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 18. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Oklahoma

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Oklahoma County, OK806,199$227k$1,3597.2%inland flooding
Tulsa County, OK680,794$256k$1,3526.3%inland flooding
Cleveland County, OK300,047$256k$1,3916.5%inland flooding
Canadian County, OK168,985$275k$1,5997.0%inland flooding
Comanche County, OK121,825$157k$1,1108.5%inland flooding
Rogers County, OK98,610$287k$1,4446.0%inland flooding
Wagoner County, OK86,609$286k$1,6216.8%inland flooding
Payne County, OK82,972$248k$1,4016.8%inland flooding
Pottawatomie County, OK73,463$197k$1,1497.0%inland flooding
Creek County, OK72,830$221k$1,2746.9%inland flooding
Muskogee County, OK66,444$161k$9917.4%inland flooding
Garfield County, OK62,146$144k$1,26610.5%inland flooding
County yield sample27/77counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+5,624IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share11.7%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Negative median metro job growth may undermine the rent-strength thesis in markets where payroll contraction reaches the tenant base.
  2. Year-over-year Zillow rent data cover 14 of 18 metros, so missing markets may alter the apparent distribution of rent momentum.
  3. The positive migration reading is from 2022-2023 and does not show whether household inflows continued into the current rental period.
  4. Permit totals measure authorized units rather than completions, tenure or delivery timing, so they cannot establish future rental competition.
  5. Gross yields exclude operating costs, financing, vacancy, turnover, repairs, taxes and insurance; county hazard labels also do not resolve parcel-level exposure.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Is Oklahoma's rental market currently tightening?

At the state level, Apartment List shows rent up 0.7% and vacancy down from 6.1% to 5.8%, while time on market remained 21.3 days. That supports tightening on rent and vacancy, but not faster leasing, and it does not establish conditions in a specific metro.

Do employment data validate the rent-growth signal?

Not broadly. Median year-over-year job growth across 18 measured metros was -0.6%, although Tahlequah, Ponca City and Tulsa were positive. The employment reading is the main counter-signal to rent strength.

Where does resale liquidity look weakest among the named metros?

Woodward had the longest measured marketing time at 116 days, 5.9 months of supply and a 95.2% sale-to-list ratio. Duncan had more supply at 6.8 months and 85 days on market. These are metro resale indicators, not expected holding periods for every property.

How complete is the metro rent-growth evidence?

Current rent levels cover 18 metros, but year-over-year Zillow rent growth covers 14. Price growth and job growth each cover 18, so comparisons involving rent momentum do not have identical metro coverage.

Can the FEMA leading-hazard labels identify a safe property?

No. They identify each county's single leading hazard category: inland flood for 72 counties, hail for three and strong wind for two. They do not measure parcel exposure, building resilience, insurance availability or expected property-specific loss.