Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 40143 · population 680,794 · part of Tulsa, OK
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,352 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $933 | Tulsa County, OK | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $987 | Tulsa County, OK | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,217 | Tulsa County, OK | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $1,602 | Tulsa County, OK | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $1,858 | Tulsa County, OK | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 40143. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Tulsa County presents a valuation-to-income tension: a $255,631 Zillow median home value and $1,352 median asking rent in its 2026-06 county observation produce a 6.35% gross yield before costs. This warrants investigation for buyers who can validate property-level rents and flood exposure; caution is warranted where taxes, insurance, and repairs erode the spread. The record supports a county screen, not a property decision.
Zillow's county value increased 2.79% year over year. FHFA's separate 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.04%; it tracks resale-price direction rather than a home value and should not be blended with Zillow's result. The effective property-tax rate is 0.97%, a direct carrying-cost input alongside unreported insurance, maintenance, financing, and flood-related costs. HUD's two-bedroom FMR is published, but it is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate; the measured asking rent, rather than FMR, underlies the reported yield.
Realtor.com's MLS listing-market evidence shows active inventory up 3.15% year over year and 21.45% of listings price-reduced. Those are visible-supply and seller-concession signals, not closed-sale pricing or stand-alone proof of buyer demand. QCEW's 2025 county workplace series reports covered employment up 0.81%; its wage is a covered-worker average, and Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the entire economy. Tax-return moves yielded net in-migration of 419 households, while incoming movers’ average income was $5,717 below outgoing movers’. Investor purchases were 14.13% of total purchases, indicating a material buyer segment but not its bidding behavior or ownership outcomes.
Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual climate loss equals 0.14% of building value; this is modeled loss, not a property-specific insurance quote. The thesis could fail if flood insurance or repair costs overwhelm gross yield, if listing concessions reflect a deeper liquidity shift, or if lower-income in-movers do not sustain local rent collections. Next checks are address-level flood zone and insurance quotes, achieved rents and vacancy, debt terms, tax assessment, and sale comparables. Published evidence does not provide those inputs, so it cannot establish net yield, debt-service coverage, or exit liquidity.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
Within the selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches assigned to Tulsa County, Zillow ZORI spans from $878 in ZIP 74136 to $1,601 in ZIP 74012. The displayed-set median is $1,302.50, yielding a $723 spread; the county Zillow figure is $1,352. The practical question is consequently not whether a single countywide rent is right, but whether a specific available unit's asking position, bedroom count, and lease terms make sense against the relevant ZIP's observed asking-rent context. This is a wide selected-set range, not a ranking of all county locations or properties. A lower or higher index alone does not tell a renter which unit fits their budget, because unit size and contract terms still require direct confirmation.
Zillow's ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index and should remain separate from ACS and HUD. The ACS five-year county median gross rent is $1,110, a survey estimate of gross rents paid, while the county Zillow index is $1,352. In the displayed ZCTAs, ACS median gross rent ranges from $861 to $1,297; that survey range has different coverage and a different reference period than the shown ZORI range, so the two should not be blended or treated as a price trend. HUD's two-bedroom FMR is an administrative standard rather than an asking-rent measure: it is $1,217 countywide and ranges from $1,080 to $1,500 in the displayed ZIPs. The ZIP ZORI-to-HUD ratios run from 70.24% to 137.5%, useful only as a screening comparison to that bedroom-specific standard.
Pressure and availability indicators present a different decision lens. ACS estimates that 45.88% of county renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent; among the shown ZCTAs, the comparable burden share ranges from 39.34% to 48.89%. This is a measure of households with higher rent-to-income shares, not a statement about the rent of a vacant listing. ACS vacancy ranges from 3.71% to 17.54% across the displayed set, compared with 8.55% countywide. These variations can guide questions about current choice and household budget exposure, but neither establishes that vacancy causes rent changes or that a ZIP's burden rate applies to every renter. A prospective renter should separately test the advertised payment against income, including recurring non-rent charges.
Coverage and geography qualify every comparison. The selection contains 12 of 31 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches, ordered by renter-household count and covering 68,006 renter households; it is not an exhaustive county or local-area inventory. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs. Moreover, ZIPs can cross county lines and were displayed under the county holding the largest HUD residential-address share; that share ranges from 72.2% to 100.0% among the shown records. Before acting on a ZIP comparison, verify the street address's jurisdiction and unit details: current advertised rent, bedroom count, lease length, deposits, utilities, required fees, concessions, availability date, and whether the listing terms match the comparison measure. These property-level checks are necessary because ZIP-level indices and survey estimates cannot price a particular unit.
31 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74133 | $1,166 | $1,197 | $1,500 | 44.0% | 5.8% | $47k | 100.0% |
| 74136 | $878 | $989 | $1,250 | 48.9% | 9.1% | $35k | 100.0% |
| 74012 → | $1,601 | $1,297 | $1,420 | 39.4% | 4.9% | $64k | 100.0% |
| 74105 | $1,523 | $992 | $1,280 | 44.0% | 9.9% | $61k | 100.0% |
| 74055 | $1,362 | $1,268 | $1,390 | 41.1% | 3.7% | $54k | 72.2% |
| 74135 | $1,441 | $966 | $1,230 | 48.9% | 9.6% | $58k | 100.0% |
| 74112 | $1,336 | $1,095 | $1,270 | 39.3% | 10.3% | $53k | 100.0% |
| 74115 | $1,112 | $1,018 | $1,090 | 43.6% | 10.9% | $44k | 100.0% |
| 74106 | $1,269 | $893 | $1,080 | 47.4% | 17.5% | $51k | 97.5% |
| 74137 | $1,200 | $1,202 | $1,400 | 44.5% | 5.6% | $48k | 100.0% |
| 74146 | $1,127 | $861 | $1,170 | 43.0% | 5.8% | $45k | 100.0% |
| 74129 | $1,485 | $987 | $1,080 | 41.9% | 8.3% | $59k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 74008 rental reportTulsa County | Bixby, OK | $1,847 | ▲ 0.6% | 38.9% | 34,006 |
| ZIP 74104 rental reportTulsa County | Tulsa, OK | $1,612 | ▲ 3.8% | 49.7% | 12,806 |
| ZIP 74012 rental reportTulsa County | Broken Arrow, OK | $1,601 | ▲ 7.2% | 39.4% | 65,060 |
| ZIP 74105 rental reportTulsa County | Tulsa, OK | $1,523 | ▲ 0.1% | 44.0% | 26,951 |
| ZIP 74135 rental reportTulsa County | Tulsa, OK | $1,441 | ▲ 5.4% | 48.9% | 20,138 |
| ZIP 74055 rental reportTulsa County | Owasso, OK | $1,362 | ▲ 2.6% | 41.1% | 51,381 |
| ZIP 74133 rental reportTulsa County | Tulsa, OK | $1,166 | ▲ 4.0% | 44.0% | 48,699 |
| ZIP 74136 rental reportTulsa County | Tulsa, OK | $878 | ▼ 0.6% | 48.9% | 31,416 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.142% of building value expected lost per year
$2,227 median annual bill
15,651 in · 15,232 out
$59,851 arriving · $65,568 leaving
1,073 of 7,595 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tulsa County | 680,794 | $256k | $1,352 | 6.3% | inland flooding |
| Rogers County | 98,610 | $287k | $1,444 | 6.0% | inland flooding |
| Wagoner County | 86,609 | $286k | $1,621 | 6.8% | inland flooding |
| Creek County | 72,830 | $221k | $1,274 | 6.9% | inland flooding |
| Osage County | 45,997 | $221k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
| Okmulgee County | 36,899 | $135k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
| Pawnee County | 15,795 | $179k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
Annual market rent before costs; it is not net yield.
No. It is a two-bedroom payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate.
No. It provides county-level modeled loss and identifies inland flood as the dominant hazard.