Cities / Oklahoma / Spans 4 counties / Tulsa
Tulsa cityscape
City housing brief · Incorporated place

Tulsa, OK

City evidence stays city-level. County, metro and national records appear separately to explain the wider market without changing the city figures.

City gross yield6.8%ZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs
Direct city rent answer

What does rent cost in Tulsa, OK?

The latest city-level Zillow ZORI for Tulsa is $1,272 per month in 2026-06. It measures a typical asking-rent market across rental types—not an arithmetic average or an address-level rent estimate.

City Zillow ZORI$1,2722026-06 · up 3.3% year over year
City ACS gross rent$1,052ACS 2024 5-year occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom contextn/aCity intersects 4 counties; no county selected
How to read the rent answer for Tulsa
MeasureCurrent valueGeographyMeasurement boundary
Zillow ZORI$1,272Tulsa cityTypical observed asking-rent index; not a unit quote.
Census ACS gross rent$1,052Tulsa citySurvey estimate for occupied renter homes, including specified utilities.
HUD 2BR FMRn/aNo single countyAdministrative bedroom standard; wider context, never substituted as city rent.

For a property decision, match bedroom count, condition, utilities, concessions, lease timing and nearby comparable listings. Wider county and metro evidence below stays explicitly labelled.Zillow pulled 2026-07-29

For within-city variation, inspect the published ZIP rental landscape rather than treating one citywide value as uniform.

City market snapshot

Four figures that frame the city

Typical home value
$223k
▲ 2.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · 2026-06
Observed market rent
$1,272
▲ 3.3% year over year
Zillow ZORI · 2026-06
Entry affordability
3.7x
home value ÷ household income
Zillow + Census ACS
Population
413,794
▲ 2.9% between ACS vintages
ACS 2024 5-year
Decision brief

What the city-level evidence says

01Decision frame

For Tulsa, Zillow’s typical city home value is $222,868 and its typical observed market rent is $1,272 per month. Those figures imply a 6.85% gross yield, calculated as annual ZORI divided by ZHVI and before every operating or financing cost. Relative to the ACS median household income, the Zillow value is 3.72x income and annual Zillow rent is 25.51% of income. This is an initial affordability and revenue frame, not a property cash-flow estimate.

02Housing stock

The city ACS describes 192,797 housing units: renters occupy 48.08% of occupied units, while the citywide vacancy rate is 10.32% of all units. Its surveyed occupied-housing measures show a $205,300 median owner-reported home value and $1,052 median gross rent, which includes contract rent plus selected utilities. These ACS measures cover different housing concepts and periods from Zillow’s typical value and observed market rent, so they should not be averaged or treated as direct comparables.

03City depth

City depth adds caution to the revenue case. The ACS shows 47.77% of renter households at the 30% or higher burden threshold. Single-family structures are 64.81% of housing units and large multifamily structures are 11.12%; neither share measures purchasable inventory. Of vacant units, 25.71% are classified as for rent, but citywide vacancy reasons cannot establish leasing speed for a specific home. Population increased 2.85% between overlapping ACS vintages, a nonannual comparison potentially affected by boundaries. Median household income is $59,838, poverty is 18.73%, and unemployment is 6.09%; these are descriptive demand constraints, not causes of rent outcomes.

04Wider context

County records differ and must follow the parcel: Osage County’s reported property-tax rate is 0.685%; Rogers County’s is 0.751%; Tulsa County’s is 0.967%; and Wagoner County’s is 0.791%. These are separate county contexts, not Tulsa city rates. In the broader Tulsa, OK metro, 32.53% of listings had price drops, while metro payroll jobs changed 0.12% year over year; neither has a city denominator. Nationally, the Freddie Mac mortgage rate is 6.58%, a financing benchmark rather than a Tulsa borrowing quote.

05Limits & next checks

Underwriting remains limited by citywide typicals, survey sampling, mismatched periods and the absence of parcel condition, legal status and lease terms. For any candidate, verify the address’s county, tax bill, insurance and hazard pricing; obtain same-property and genuinely comparable rent and sale evidence; inspect systems and deferred maintenance; review title, permits and rental rules; and model concessions, downtime, utilities, management, repairs, capital reserves and actual loan terms. A rent-ready budget and lender quote are necessary before converting the headline yield into expected cash flow.

Housing system

Market movement and the stock underneath it

Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI +31.4%ZORI +30.8%
13111395202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Housing stock

Tenure and vacancy

ACS
48.1%RENTER
Owner occupied51.9%
Renter occupied48.1%
Vacant units10.3%

Median structure year 1973

Tenure uses occupied units; vacancy uses all housing units.
Measurement matrix

Two sources, two different questions

SourceHome valueMonthly rent
Zillow market index$222.9K$1.3K
ACS occupied housing$205.3K$1.1K
Zillow measures current market indexes. ACS reports surveyed owner value and gross rent for occupied housing. The rows are context, not interchangeable estimates.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Tulsa, OK

These Apartment List observations match the exact city Census code 4075000. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,067$977$8862021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,0672026-07 · +2.2% year over year
Rental vacancy5.2%2026-07 · +0.6 percentage points year over year
Time on market23 days2026-07 · -0.5 days year over year
Direct city depth

Households and housing form behind the medians

Median household income$60k

Annual ACS household measure.

Rent-to-income screen25.5%

Annual ZORI divided by ACS median income.

ACS rent burden47.8%

Renters paying at least 30% of household income toward gross rent.

Average household size2.34

People per occupied housing unit.

Single-family stock64.8%

Detached and attached one-unit structures.

Large multifamily stock11.1%

Housing in structures with 20 or more units.

Vacant and for rent25.7%

Share of vacant units listed by ACS as for rent, not a market vacancy rate.

Unemployment6.1%

Share of the civilian labor force.

Poverty18.7%

ACS population for whom poverty status is determined.

These are citywide context measures. They cannot tell you the rent, vacancy, expenses or tenant demand for a particular neighborhood or property.
ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Tulsa

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. It is a selected evidence set, not a neighborhood ranking or an exhaustive city inventory.

Selected ZIP range$878$1,612Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$734highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range39.3%49.7%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered60,153across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.74104$1,61274105$1,52374129$1,48574135$1,44174112$1,33674106$1,26974137$1,20074133$1,16674107$1,13174146$1,12774115$1,11274136$878
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.52.2%48.4%44.5%40.7%36.8%741337413674135741047410574112741157410674137741467412974107Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.74129+137.5%74105+119.0%74106+117.5%74135+117.2%74104+111.9%74112+105.2%74115+102.0%74146+96.3%74107+93.5%74137+85.7%74133+77.7%74136+70.2%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

The selected 12-ZIP evidence set covers 60,153 renter households, so it is a bounded within-city view rather than a complete inventory for the city. In June 2026, Zillow ZORI, the typical observed asking-rent index, runs from $878 in ZIP 74136 to $1,612 in ZIP 74104: a $734 spread around a $1,234.50 set median. That dispersion makes the core renter question less about a single Tulsa figure and more about whether current listings in a chosen ZIP, bedroom count, and lease structure fit a fixed budget. Lower indexed asking rent should be tested against live availability, fees, and unit configuration rather than treated as a universal affordability result.

Zillow, ACS, and HUD serve separate comparisons here. For example, ZIP 74135 has a $1,441 ZORI value, a $966 ACS 2024 five-year median gross rent, and a $1,230 HUD 2-bedroom FMR/SAFMR figure. These are not competing observations of one unit: ZORI describes current typical asking-rent conditions, ACS gross rent is a five-year survey estimate, and HUD’s bedroom-specific figure is an administrative standard. The selected ZORI-to-HUD ratio spans 70.24% in ZIP 74136 and 137.5% in ZIP 74129. Use the ratios to frame search and program thresholds, but evaluate bedrooms, utilities, and lease terms at property level.

Affordability pressure and availability indicators do not line up cleanly across the set. ACS estimates put the share of renter households spending 30% or more of income on rent between 39.34% and 49.70%, compared with 47.77% for the city. ACS vacancy ranges from 5.65% to 17.54%, against 10.32% citywide. The highest asking-rent ZIP is also at the high end of both burden and vacancy in this selection, illustrating why a larger vacancy measure does not on its own settle affordability or negotiating conditions. For a renter, the trade-off is to screen the total monthly obligation and income fit first, then use vacancy as context for how broadly to check current listings, not as a promise of concessions.

Read the evidence as matched ZIP/ZCTA geography, not precise delivery boundaries: Census ZCTAs are statistical areas and do not exactly equal USPS ZIPs. The selection contains published direct ZIP reports first and otherwise follows renter-household scale; it includes fewer than the eligible matches and is not an exhaustive neighborhood inventory. ACS sampling and five-year aggregation, ZORI’s index construction, the missing year-over-year values for some displayed ZIPs, and HUD crosswalk/FMR methods each constrain comparisons. Before applying any figure to a lease, verify the advertised address, bedroom count, rent, utilities, recurring and one-time fees, availability date, income rules, lease length, and whether the unit’s location matches the applicable geography.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

23 ZIP profiles passed the city gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screen
74133$1,166$1,197$1,50044.0%5.8%$47k
74136$878$989$1,25048.9%9.1%$35k
74135$1,441$966$1,23048.9%9.6%$58k
74104$1,612$1,135$1,44049.7%14.7%$64k
74105$1,523$992$1,28044.0%9.9%$61k
74112$1,336$1,095$1,27039.3%10.3%$53k
74115$1,112$1,018$1,09043.6%10.9%$44k
74106$1,269$893$1,08047.4%17.5%$51k
74137$1,200$1,202$1,40044.5%5.6%$48k
74146$1,127$861$1,17043.0%5.8%$45k
74129$1,485$987$1,08041.9%8.3%$59k
74107$1,131$1,007$1,21040.3%9.2%$45k
READ BEFORE USING

The ZIP evidence set is selected rather than comprehensive: it prioritizes current published direct ZIP reports and then renter-household scale. It therefore should not be read as a map of every Tulsa rental option, and it is bounded by data-match availability.

Census ZCTA estimates are statistical-area, five-year survey results rather than USPS delivery-ZIP measures. Zillow is an asking-rent index, while HUD values are bedroom-specific administrative standards; crosswalks, timing, unit mix, and missing year-over-year observations can limit direct ZIP-to-ZIP comparisons.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Closest market alternatives

Three useful contrasts, not a synthetic winner

The peer set broadens the decision without mixing geographies. Price, rent and housing characteristics remain city-level for every place.

Comparable market profile

Entry price, rent and gross yield

Tulsa, OKOklahoma City, OKNorman, OKWichita, KS
Typical home valueZillow ZHVITulsa$222.9KOklahoma City$209.5KNorman$265.8KWichita$208.2KObserved market rentZillow ZORI / monthTulsa$1.3KOklahoma City$1.3KNorman$1.4KWichita$1.1KGross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVITulsa6.8%Oklahoma City7.4%Norman6.2%Wichita6.6%
Bars begin at zero within each measure. Gross yield is a screening ratio before financing, taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance or management costs.
Same state01

Oklahoma City, OK

Compared with Tulsa, typical home value is $13k lower, monthly rent is $26 higher, and gross yield is 0.6 percentage points higher.

Rent burden 30%+
48.8%
Renter share
41.4%
One-unit stock
71.0%
20+ unit stock
8.1%
Same state02

Norman, OK

Compared with Tulsa, typical home value is $43k higher, monthly rent is $111 higher, and gross yield is 0.6 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
50.7%
Renter share
46.7%
One-unit stock
66.1%
20+ unit stock
7.9%
Closest data profile03

Wichita, KS

Compared with Tulsa, typical home value is $15k lower, monthly rent is $126 lower, and gross yield is 0.2 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
44.6%
Renter share
41.1%
One-unit stock
71.0%
20+ unit stock
8.3%

These are analytical alternatives, not recommendations. The structural measures come from Census ACS; price and rent use the Zillow releases shown on each card and in the source ledger below.

Wider market context

What surrounds the city without being mistaken for it

The layers below answer different questions. County records describe listing, migration, financing and hazard conditions around the city; metro records describe jobs, supply and permits; the mortgage rate is national.

Same measure, wider boundary

City marker against intersecting counties

CityCounty range
Typical home value$220.6K$287.4K$222.9KObserved market rent$1.4K$1.6K$1.3K
Both levels use Zillow indexes, but the county records cover land and housing outside the city. The comparison supplies context; it does not replace the city value.
Same Zillow index families

City limits versus the linked metro

TulsaMetro
Observed market rentMetro $1.4KCity $1.3K · -6.5%Typical home valueMetro $255.8KCity $222.9K · -12.9%Gross yieldMetro 6.4%City 6.8% · +7.4%
Zillow ZORI and ZHVI use the same release month at both boundaries. Gross yield is rent × 12 ÷ home value; the metro contains the city and is context, not a substitute.

Search all direct city–metro gaps in the interactive atlas.

COUNTY LAYER

All 4 intersecting counties

Rows stay separate; no unweighted county average is presented as a city fact.

2026-06
Active listings
85
Listing DOM
48 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 5.1%
Net migration
184
Investor share
8.0%
Effective property tax
0.69%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.22%
2026-06
Active listings
281
Listing DOM
51 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 4.6%
Net migration
306
Investor share
8.7%
Effective property tax
0.75%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.18%
2026-06
Active listings
2,097
Listing DOM
50 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 3.0%
Net migration
419
Investor share
14.1%
Effective property tax
0.97%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.14%
2026-06
Active listings
334
Listing DOM
52 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 2.8%
Net migration
575
Investor share
6.3%
Effective property tax
0.79%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.19%
METRO LAYER

Tulsa, OK

Open metro analysis →
Job growth▲ 0.1%12m to 2026-06
Permitted units4,8542026 YTD through M06
Permits / 1,0004.7broader metro population
Months of supply2.42026-05-01
Median DOM31 daysRedfin metro tracker
Price drops32.5%Redfin metro tracker
Wider-context figures are not inputs to the city gross yield and are never used to fill a missing city price, rent or ACS measure.
What can break the thesis

Three checks before using the city averages

  1. 01

    Citywide and surveyed measures may not match the subject property’s achievable rent or value.

  2. 02

    Taxes, insurance, hazards, repairs, vacancy and financing can materially reduce gross yield.

  3. 03

    Overlapping ACS vintages and possible boundary changes limit interpretation of population change.

Questions answered

Quick reading guide

Is the headline yield a net return?

No. It excludes every operating and financing cost.

Which county figures should be used for a property?

Use the records for the county containing the parcel; do not average the county contexts.

Does the city vacancy rate prove a property will lease quickly?

No. Leasing speed requires property-specific rent, condition, location and competition checks.

Sources and geography

What belongs to this city page

Census recognizes this as Tulsa city. The place intersects 4 counties (Osage County, Rogers County, Tulsa County, Wagoner County); population and ACS measures are place-wide.