Counties / Minnesota / Faribault County

Faribault County, MN

FIPS 27043 · population 13,914 · outside every metro area

$165k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$165k
▲ 6.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$799
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.7%FHFA HPI2025+9.7%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$135k
Surveyed gross rent$799
Rent burden 30%+42.4%
Median year built1952
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
11.9%vacant
6,897estimated housing units
Occupied tenure20.8% renter
owner 79.2%renter 20.8%
Structure mix89.2% single-family
Single-family 89.2%20+ units 2.9%Mobile home 1.2%Other 6.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs4,453▼ 2.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments484annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,025▲ 2.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing26.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−2.1%WEEKLY WAGE+2.7%Manufacturing26.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Faribault County has an appreciation-versus-demand tension. Zillow’s June 2026 median home value was $165,088, up 6.65%; FHFA’s separate 2025 repeat-transaction index rose 9.69% and recorded a 54.53% cumulative five-year increase. Different vintages and methods mean they must not be averaged, and FHFA is not a home value. This merits property-level rent and resale investigation; yield-dependent buyers should be cautious. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed.

02Housing economics

Missing rent is decisive. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $973 per month, a payment standard rather than an asking-rent estimate, so it cannot substitute for market rent. The effective property-tax rate is 0.99%, with median annual tax of $1,334. Test those costs against achievable rent, not FMR or Zillow’s value. Insurance premium, flood deductible, operating expense, vacancy, financing, and condition are absent; cash flow, cap rate, and cost-adjusted yield therefore cannot be underwritten.

03Demand & competition

Demand and buyer competition are mixed. QCEW records 4,453 annual average covered jobs, down 2.11%, and a $1,025 average weekly covered-worker wage; these are workplace, not resident, employment measures. Manufacturing is the largest disclosed private supersector, so the wage signal is not the whole economy. Tax-return migration was net -28, while average AGI was $877 higher for movers in than out, a calculated difference. Realtor.com’s visible supply increased 39.62%; its 67.57% pending ratio is listing-market evidence, not closed-sale demand. Investors represented 7.87% of 127 purchases: limited measured non-occupant competition, not proof of rental demand.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss is 0.15% of building value per year; that model is not an insurance quote or substitute for parcel flood-zone, elevation, drainage, or claims review. Employment softness and net outmigration leave tenant and buyer depth unproven, while Manufacturing is only the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Next checks: actual rent comps and leases; complete tax, insurance, utility, repair, and financing costs; and parcel-level flood, condition, sale, and title diligence. Rent and operating inputs are missing, preventing a cash-flow conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Faribault County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Blue Earth city3.2KWells city2.3KWinnebago city1.3KMinnesota Lake city*687Kiester city494Elmore city451Bricelyn city392Frost city275
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

11 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Blue Earth cityIncorporated place
    3,165
  2. 02
    Wells cityIncorporated place
    2,296
  3. 03
    Winnebago cityIncorporated place
    1,280
  4. 04
    Minnesota Lake cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    687
  5. 05
    Kiester cityIncorporated place
    494
  6. 06
    Elmore cityIncorporated place
    451
  7. 07
    Bricelyn cityIncorporated place
    392
  8. 08
    Frost cityIncorporated place
    275
  9. 09
    Easton cityIncorporated place
    178
  10. 10
    Delavan cityIncorporated place
    160
  11. 11
    Walters cityIncorporated place
    57

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.148% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.99%

$1,334 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-28

310 in · 338 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$877

$48,448 arriving · $47,571 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.9%

10 of 127 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings37▲ 39.6% year over year
Median days on market34▼ 6.9% year over year
Listings price-reduced9.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 3.5% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Achievable rent and operating costs may not support the purchase price, but the supplied record cannot test that outcome.
  2. Employment softness and net outmigration may limit tenant and buyer depth; the county record does not establish their persistence.
  3. Inland-flood exposure and unpriced insurance or property losses may materially change carrying costs and returns.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

How should the Zillow and FHFA appreciation evidence be compared?

They show positive appreciation in different vintages and use different methods; FHFA is a repeat-transaction index, not a home value, and the measures must not be averaged.

Does investor participation establish rental demand?

No. The record measures non-occupant purchases as a share of total purchases, not rental demand.