Counties / Utah / Garfield County

Garfield County, UT

FIPS 49017 · population 5,219 · outside every metro area

$248k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$248k
▲ 0.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$817
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$984
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+68.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.7%FHFA HPI2025+2.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$318k
Surveyed gross rent$817
Rent burden 30%+26.5%
Median year built1982
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
43.6%vacant
3,620estimated housing units
Occupied tenure29.7% renter
owner 70.3%renter 29.7%
Structure mix85.6% single-family
Single-family 85.6%20+ units 0.8%Mobile home 8.0%Other 5.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,600▲ 3.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments283annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,391▲ 73.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorLeisure and hospitality56.4% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+3.3%WEEKLY WAGE+73.2%Leisure and hospitality56.4%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Garfield County presents a split underwriting frame: its Zillow county median home value was $247,921 in 2026-06, while the listed annual change was only 0.67%. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI, reported for 2025, rose 2.79% over its annual observation. Both point upward, but they use different methods and labeled periods; neither is a sale-price comp and the rates must not be combined. Cash-flow buyers and exit-sensitive buyers should investigate rather than treat appreciation as settled.

02Housing economics

Income underwriting is the binding gap. No county market asking rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed from the home-value measure. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $984 per month is a payment standard, not measured market rent, and cannot substitute for it. The effective property-tax rate is 0.35%, with a $1,127 median annual tax; these county figures identify carrying-cost exposure but do not establish the tax bill on a particular parcel. Lease comparables, achieved rents, vacancy, utilities and insurance costs are not published, preventing a net-income or debt-service conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Workplace evidence offers a limited demand read. QCEW annual covered employment in the county grew 3.30%; it measures covered jobs at county workplaces, not resident employment or unemployment. Leisure and hospitality, the largest disclosed private supersector, represented 56.37% of private covered employment, which focuses diligence on sector concentration rather than defining the entire economy. Tax-return migration was net positive by 13 households, and inbound movers’ average income exceeded outbound movers’ by $1,344; this is a small flow, not proof of housing demand. Investors accounted for three of 57 purchases, or 5.26%, indicating limited observed non-occupant mortgage participation rather than all buyer competition.

04Risk & next checks

The principal disclosed physical risk is inland flood. Modeled climate loss equals 0.13% of building value annually; it is not a dollar estimate and should be checked against parcel flood exposure, insurance terms and mitigation. Realtor.com MLS listing price, active inventory, days on market and price-reduced share are not published, so visible supply, seller concessions and marketing time cannot be assessed. Closed-sale comps are also absent. These gaps prevent a supported liquidity or rent-based return conclusion and make parcel-level rent, tax, insurance and flood review the next checks.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Garfield County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Panguitch city1.7KEscalante city604Tropic town582Henrieville town391Boulder town360Cannonville town228Bryce Canyon City town203Hatch town165
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

9 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Panguitch cityIncorporated place
    1,701
  2. 02
    Escalante cityIncorporated place
    604
  3. 03
    Tropic townIncorporated place
    582
  4. 04
    Henrieville townIncorporated place
    391
  5. 05
    Boulder townIncorporated place
    360
  6. 06
    Cannonville townIncorporated place
    228
  7. 07
    Bryce Canyon City townIncorporated place
    203
  8. 08
    Hatch townIncorporated place
    165
  9. 09
    Antimony townIncorporated place
    65

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.132% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.35%

$1,127 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+13

157 in · 144 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$1,344

$62,955 arriving · $61,611 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.3%

3 of 57 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Parcel flood exposure, insurance availability, or mitigation needs may exceed the county-level modeled loss signal.
  2. Unpublished market rents, vacancy, and operating costs may not support the acquisition basis.
  3. Missing MLS supply, marketing-time, and closed-sale evidence may conceal weaker exit liquidity or seller concessions.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is a county market rent available for gross-yield underwriting?

No. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed.

What is the disclosed dominant hazard?

Inland flood.

Which private supersector is largest in disclosed covered employment?

Leisure and hospitality.