States / Utah
State rental intelligence

Utah rental market data

A source-traced view across 8 metro markets and 29 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

8/8 metros scored29/29 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro52.0out of 100 · 8 measured metros
Utah identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$526kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,626monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield3.9%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 1.1%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Utah rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,3302026-07 · ▼ 1.6% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index8.9%2026-07 · +0.7 pp in 12 months
Time on market38 days2026-07 · +5 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,517$1,197$876Rental Vacancy Index9.7%6.5%3.2%2017-012021-102026-07UtahUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rents are falling as rental vacancy and marketing time rise, even while median Zillow metro rents and employment still grow across Utah's measured coverage.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Apartment List's July 2026 state series shows recent-lease rent down 1.6% year over year to $1,330, rental vacancy up to 8.9%, and time on market up 5.3 days to 38 days. The counter-signal is that Zillow rent growth across eight measured metros had a positive 2.7% median, while median metro employment growth was 1.1%. These sources measure different market segments and should not be collapsed into one rent trend.

Screening should begin with current lease execution, then test local rent-to-value economics, supply and resale conditions, and tenant affordability. The packet cannot show whether the statewide recent-lease weakness is concentrated in particular metros, properties or unit types. County Zillow rent coverage reaches only 12 of Utah's 29 counties, and the evidence does not include property-specific concessions, operating expenses or occupancy.

01

Apartment List rent down 1.6%, rental vacancy at 8.9% and marketing time at 38 days → test turnover economics without relying on statewide rent growth

02

Median Zillow metro rent growth of 2.7% versus 2.2% value growth → verify the applicable source and submarket before selecting a rent trend

03

St. George at 10.1 months of resale supply with 32.0% price drops and 15.39 permits per 1,000 residents → apply a market-specific supply and exit-liquidity screen

04

Median metro job growth of 1.1% and net movement of 3,138 people → retain demand as a counter-signal, but test whether it converts into renter households

05

Median metro gross yield of 3.9% and median county renter burden of 40.3% → require property-level expense and affordability tests rather than relying on gross rent alone

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Three recent-lease measures moved in a softer direction

Recent-lease rent declined from $1,352 to $1,330, a 1.6% year-over-year decrease. The separate Apartment List Vacancy Index rose from 8.3% to 8.9%, a 0.7 percentage-point increase, while the separate time-on-market series increased from 32.7 to 38 days. Current rental vacancy was 1.8 percentage points above the supplied national measure, and marketing time was eight days longer.

Together, the three series make aggressive turnover rent assumptions harder to support at the state level. They do not identify which Utah metros or unit types account for the movement, and the vacancy and marketing-time measures should not be treated as an arithmetic explanation for the rent decline.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Zillow metro rents remain positive, but the rent-value relationship varies sharply

Across eight measured metros, median Zillow rent growth was 2.7%, compared with 2.2% median home-value growth; the supplied median difference was 0.5 percentage points. Metro rent growth ran from 0.5% at the 10th percentile to 6.0% at the 90th, while value growth ranged from 0.6% to 3.2%.

Heber, UT, shows the strongest named separation, with rent up 11.0% and value up 2.3%. Vernal, UT, supplies a counterexample: rent rose 3.6% while value rose 4.6%. Logan, UT, was between them, with rent up 3.9% and value up 2.5%. This dispersion supports metro-specific comparable-rent work, but Zillow's market-rent series does not resolve the conflicting statewide recent-lease signal or establish achievable rent for a particular property.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Supply and resale conditions

St. George combines a large resale supply cushion with active permitting

Across eight metros, resale inventory had a 5.3-month median, with a 3.4-to-8.9-month 10th-to-90th percentile range. Median marketing time was 43.5 days, and 30.6% of listings had price drops. St. George, UT, stood above that distribution with 10.1 months of supply, 51 days on market and price drops on 32.0% of listings. Its permit measure was 3,024 units, or 15.39 per 1,000 residents.

The indicators do not move uniformly. Heber, UT, had 8.4 months of supply but price drops on 17.1% of listings and a 97.2% sale-to-list ratio. These figures are useful for testing acquisition and resale execution, not for measuring apartment availability: permits are not completed units, do not identify rental tenure, and Redfin's listing measures describe the resale market rather than rental time on market.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Employment and household movement

Jobs and net movement provide a real demand counter-signal

Employment growth across eight measured metros had a 1.1% median and a 0.2%-to-1.9% 10th-to-90th percentile range. The named readings were 2.1% in St. George, UT, 1.8% in Cedar City, UT, and 1.4% in Provo, UT.

Migration totals covering 29 counties recorded 91,930 moves in and 88,792 moves out, for net movement of 3,138 people, or 0.9 per 1,000 residents. This is a genuine counter-signal to softer recent leasing conditions, but the employment and migration releases cover different periods and do not establish renter-household formation or show that demand reached the properties represented in the July lease data.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

05
Entry cost and affordability

Gross yields center near 3.9%, leaving local costs decisive

Across eight metros, the median home value was $525,597 and median Zillow rent was $1,626. Median gross yield was 3.9%, with a 3.5%-to-4.5% 10th-to-90th percentile range. The median price-to-income ratio was 5.81, while median annual rent equaled 22.6% of income.

Vernal, UT, combines a $360,349 value, $1,422 rent and 4.7% gross yield; rent equals 23.1% of local income. St. George, UT, combines a $531,486 value, $1,936 rent and 4.4% gross yield, but rent equals 28.8% of income. Gross yield is only an entry screen: it excludes vacancy, management, maintenance, capital work, financing, taxes and insurance, so the packet cannot establish net operating return.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income and gross rent · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

06
Housing stock and tenant conditions

High housing vacancy does not cancel widespread renter strain

Across 29 counties, the median renter share was 21.1%, while single-family housing represented a median 79.9% of stock and large multifamily only 1.4%. A median 40.3% of renters were burdened at 30% or more of income, reaching 49.7% at the 90th percentile. The named burden readings were 56.7% in Washington County, 54.5% in Iron County and 50.1% in Carbon County.

Some small counties also show very high ACS housing vacancy: 75.2% in Daggett County, population 783; 72.6% in Rich County, population 2,631; and 46.2% in Kane County, population 8,170. That ACS measure does not isolate year-round units available to long-term renters and is not comparable with Apartment List's rental Vacancy Index. It therefore cannot be used by itself to infer abundant leasable inventory.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Utah

The distribution uses 15 current published ZIP reports across 10 cities and 4 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,318$2,365full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income23.3%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 1.3%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered92,882across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.84043$2,36584111$1,92984106$1,82084121$1,74484015$1,74184103$1,64784058$1,55184102$1,51684047$1,50584401$1,45084107$1,40084116$1,318
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.62.2%54.6%47.0%39.4%31.8%841078404784102841038440184116840588410684111840438401584121Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.5.8%4.7%3.7%2.6%1.6%841078404784102841038440184116840588410684111840438401584121Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Across the 15 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, Zillow ZORI asking-rent index values range from $1,318 to $2,365, a $1,047 spread. That dispersion makes a ZIP-level practical question more useful than a single state figure: is a current asking-rent level aligned with household-income context, renter-burden evidence, and its own historical path? The distribution includes only published ZIP reports with direct evidence, not every Utah ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property, and should be read as an observed slice rather than a complete market inventory. Within this distribution, publication denotes direct evidence rather than a judgment about geographic importance or property supply.

Affordability needs two lenses that answer different questions. The asking-rent-to-income measure—current ZORI asking rent against ACS median household income—runs from 18.1% to 43.7%, with a 23.3% median. The ACS five-year ZCTA share of renter households paying 30% or more of income toward gross rent ranges from 34.3% to 59.7%, with a 44.2% median. The first is a current-rent-to-area-income comparison; the second describes surveyed renter-household burden under a gross-rent measure. A lower ratio can coexist with a higher burden share because source definitions, household composition, and reference periods differ; that is a measurement distinction, not an explanation for rent differences. Neither establishes the cost position of a particular household.

Momentum is not uniformly positive, and it should not be conflated with steadiness. One-year change in the direct monthly ZORI series spans a 3.1% decline to 4.7% growth, with a 1.3% median gain. Annualized volatility ranges from 2.6% to 4.8%, median 3.5%; 9 reports are tagged high variability, compared with 4 stable-growth and 2 mixed histories. For a counter-signal, 84116 carries the fastest one-year gain but is high variability, while 84103 has the lowest volatility and is stable growth. The categories are compact history classifications; they do not replace review of the monthly series when timing matters. These are historical rent-index patterns, not predictions.

HUD comparison is a benchmark check, not a market-rent appraisal. Across these reports, ZORI asking rent equals 88.2% to 162.0% of the applicable HUD two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR figure, with a 107.9% median. In 84043, the $2,365 index sits against a $1,460 HUD two-bedroom standard; in 84116, $1,318 sits against $1,494. Those gaps frame comparison with an administrative benchmark but cannot identify a unit’s bedroom count, utilities, lease terms, condition, availability, or exact eligibility. They also do not establish whether a listed home is comparable to the index or a program’s applicable rent standard. ZORI is observed asking-rent evidence, whereas HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom standard, so a ratio is not a like-for-like property valuation.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 15 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
84107Murray$1,400▼ 3.1%23.3%44.2%3.7%▲ 93.7%
84047Midvale$1,505▼ 0.7%23.8%49.4%3.6%▲ 100.7%
84102Salt Lake City$1,516▼ 0.8%34.9%59.7%3.5%▲ 101.5%
84103Salt Lake City$1,647▲ 2.6%23.6%38.4%2.6%▲ 110.2%
84401Ogden$1,450▲ 1.3%21.5%42.6%3.8%▲ 89.8%
84116Salt Lake City$1,318▲ 4.7%23.7%52.3%3.7%▲ 88.2%
84058Orem$1,551▲ 1.0%25.0%44.2%3.5%▲ 106.2%
84106Salt Lake City$1,820▲ 1.9%21.5%40.2%3.0%▲ 121.8%
84111Salt Lake City$1,929▲ 1.1%43.7%50.1%3.2%▲ 129.1%
84043Lehi$2,365▲ 2.7%21.9%34.3%2.7%▲ 162.0%
84015Clearfield$1,741▲ 1.0%21.9%45.0%2.6%▲ 107.9%
84121Cottonwood Heights$1,744▲ 1.3%18.1%35.7%4.8%▲ 116.7%
READ BEFORE USING

ACS housing, income, and renter-burden figures are 2024 five-year survey estimates for Census ZCTAs. ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, so apparent ZIP matches are geographic approximations and the survey measures carry sampling and multiyear-reference limitations.

ZORI is an observed asking-rent index, not a census of advertisements or executed leases. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative two-bedroom standard; a difference between the two cannot establish a property’s market rent, utility treatment, eligibility, bedroom equivalence, or tenant-specific affordability.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Utah

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change0.6%2.2%3.2%Asking-rent change0.5%2.7%6.0%Rent minus price0.5%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k3.710.014.0Months of supply3.4×5.3×8.9×Days on market35 days44 days55 daysListings with cuts23.7%30.6%34.7%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change0.2%1.1%1.9%Net migration / 1k0.9Net household movement3,138
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution8 scored metros · median 52.0
00–19120–39640–59160–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
41%12/29Rent100%29/29Climate100%29/29Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Vernal4.7%St. George4.4%Cedar City4.3%Provo4.0%Ogden3.7%Logan3.7%Heber3.6%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Utah

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Vernal, UT65$360k$1,4224.7%▲ 0.9%
2Logan, UT58$474k$1,4603.7%▲ 0.7%
3Heber, UT52$1155k$3,4493.6%▲ 0.7%
4Provo, UT52$548k$1,8474.0%▲ 1.4%
5Salt Lake City, UT52$567k$1,6383.5%▲ 1.3%
6St. George, UT46$531k$1,9364.4%▲ 2.1%
7Cedar City, UT40$414k$1,4834.3%▲ 1.8%
8Ogden, UT32$520k$1,6143.7%▼ 0.9%
Below the metro line

Largest counties in Utah

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Salt Lake County, UT1,196,523$576k$1,6393.4%earthquake
Utah County, UT705,400$549k$1,8474.0%earthquake
Davis County, UT370,924$564k$1,7343.7%earthquake
Weber County, UT269,648$465k$1,4793.8%earthquake
Washington County, UT196,431$531k$1,9364.4%wildfire
Cache County, UT140,046$477k$1,4633.7%earthquake
Tooele County, UT79,347$482k$1,7354.3%wildfire
Iron County, UT62,252$414k$1,4834.3%wildfire
Box Elder County, UT61,246$457k$1,2513.3%earthquake
Summit County, UT42,970$1339k$3,7773.4%inland flooding
Uintah County, UT37,056$360k$1,4224.7%inland flooding
Wasatch County, UT36,642$952k$3,1183.9%inland flooding
County yield sample12/29counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+3,138IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share5.9%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. The Apartment List evidence is statewide, so it cannot reveal which Utah metros, unit types or price tiers account for weaker recent leasing.
  2. Apartment List recent-lease rent and Zillow market rent measure different populations and periods; treating either as the definitive statewide trend could reverse the screening conclusion.
  3. County Zillow rent coverage includes 12 counties, compared with 29 counties in the state, leaving substantial county-level rent gaps.
  4. Permits are not completions or confirmed rentals, and resale inventory, price cuts and Redfin days on market do not measure rental availability.
  5. ACS housing vacancy does not isolate leasable long-term rentals, while gross yield omits property expenses, financing, concessions and physical condition.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Do the current figures support a broad rent-increase assumption?

Not at the state recent-lease level: Apartment List rent fell 1.6% while rental vacancy and marketing time rose. Zillow's eight-metro median rent growth was positive at 2.7%, so any increase assumption requires local, source-consistent evidence.

What does the St. George supply screen show?

St. George had 10.1 months of resale supply, 51 days on market, price drops on 32.0% of listings and 15.39 permitted units per 1,000 residents. Those figures flag resale and pipeline pressure but do not quantify completed rental supply.

Do employment and migration confirm the rental slowdown?

No. Median metro employment growth remained positive at 1.1%, and statewide county totals showed net movement of 3,138 people. These are counter-signals, but they do not identify renter formation or current lease absorption.

Which named yield example has the strongest gross entry screen?

Among the named examples, Vernal has a 4.7% gross yield on a $360,349 value and $1,422 monthly rent, compared with 4.4% in St. George and 4.3% in Cedar City. The comparison is pre-expense and is not a net-return ranking.

Can high county ACS vacancy be treated as available rental inventory?

No. Daggett, Rich and Kane counties have high ACS housing-vacancy readings, but the measure does not identify year-round long-term rentals and the named counties have small populations. It is separate from the Apartment List rental Vacancy Index.