ZIP reports / UT / 84106
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 84106, Salt Lake City, UT

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 84106?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 84106 is $1,820 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,8202026-06 · up 1.9% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,682ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$82 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,494Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 84106
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,316ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,080HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,463ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,201HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,820ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,494HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,436ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,000HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,892ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,374HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$101,551ACS 2024 5-year · ±$8,042 MOE
Renter share38.9%6,208 renter households
Rent burden 30%+40.2%2,498 observed households
Housing vacancy7.8%1,356 of 17,306 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 84106Zillow asking-rent index$1,820ACS median gross rent$1,682HUD two-bedroom standard$1,494

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 84106ACS median household income$101,551Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$72,800

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 84106Studio$1,316One bedroom$1,463Two bedrooms$1,820Three bedrooms$2,436Four bedrooms$2,892

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8410630% or more of income2,498 householdsBelow 30%3,710 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 84106ZIP 84106$1,820Salt Lake City city$1,629Salt Lake County county$1,639Salt Lake City, UT metro$1,638

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 84106; missing months remain gaps$1,875$1,745$1,614$1,4842021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
19.0%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
3.7%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.0%100 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%101 of 101 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 84106

At the June 2026 endpoint, Zillow ZORI puts the ZIP’s typical observed asking-rent index, blended across rental types, at $1,820 per month. Its exact same-month annualized change was 1.9% over one year, 1.3% over three years, and 3.5% over five years. The latest pace therefore confirms a positive long-run direction, but it is faster than the middle period and still breaks from the older, faster five-year path. The direct history has 101 observations with 100% coverage. Annualized monthly-return variability was 3.0% and maximum drawdown was -3.7%, so coverage supports continuity while variation limits the confidence warranted by one current index snapshot. These are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations. Transparent national discovery scores were 42.1 for momentum, 46.7 for stability, and 43.9 for balanced performance, ranked 1,684, 1,548, and 1,813 among history-eligible ZIPs, respectively.

Comparison starts with scope, not an assumed conflict. The five-digit label 84106 is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and a match to a Census ZCTA. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Zillow’s June index is an asking-rent measure; it should not be substituted for the ACS 2024 five-year median gross rent of $1,682, which is a survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The asking index is 8.2% above that ACS median, but part of the difference can reflect definitions, survey versus index construction, and timing rather than a contradiction. The ACS value describes existing occupied renter households in the matched ZCTA; Zillow describes typical observed asking rents for the ZIP market.

The supplied FY2026 local HUD ladder provides a useful sizing mechanism, but a different universe again. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent. Scaling the ZIP ZORI by that local ladder produces modelled monthly estimates of $1,316 for a studio, $1,463 for one bedroom, $1,820 for two bedrooms, $2,436 for three bedrooms, and $2,892 for four bedrooms. They are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents, and they carry the ZORI’s blended-rental-type premise into each size. The two-bedroom estimate sits 21.8% above the supplied local two-bedroom HUD standard of $1,494. That gap cannot establish what any advertised or leased two-bedroom charges, because HUD’s administrative benchmark is designed for a different purpose.

An affordability screen should likewise remain arithmetic. Annualizing the Zillow index at a 30% share yields $72,800 of required household income; it is not advice, a household budget, or an applicant qualification rule. Relative to the matched ZCTA’s ACS median household income of $101,551, that annualized asking-rent screen equals 21.5% before any household-specific expenses or lease terms. In the ACS occupied-renter sample, 2,498 of 6,208 renter households, or 40.2%, reported gross-rent burdens at or above the threshold. Gross rent’s selected-utility treatment matters here. This population measure identifies a material burden share in the survey, but it cannot prove burden, eligibility, or affordability for any person or particular unit.

The matched ZCTA’s ACS housing counts provide stock context rather than listings. Of 17,306 housing units, 1,356 were vacant, a 7.8% vacancy rate; this is an area-wide count, not evidence that a particular property is available. Renter occupancy represents 38.9% of occupied homes, and 555 vacant units were classified for rent. The stock spans reported structure categories: 11,547 units were single-family structures, while 2,485 were in large multifamily structures. These categories describe the area’s reported housing composition and vacancy status in the ACS survey; they do not reveal condition, rent, concessions, bedroom count, turnover timing, or the availability of a specific unit.

Against wider benchmarks, ZIP rent is elevated, but the comparisons remain context only. The Salt Lake City city-context rent is $1,629, the Salt Lake County county-context rent is $1,639, and the Salt Lake City, UT metro-context rent is $1,638; each sits below the ZIP’s Zillow index. Those city, county, and metro figures cover broader geographies and should not be treated as alternate measurements of this ZIP. The local matched-ZCTA household-income and renter-share profile may differ from each larger scope, as may rental types represented in their rent measures. Thus the comparison frames the ZIP’s current index within named city, county, and metro contexts without converting broad averages into a property-level price or a claim about why the difference exists.

Before relying on a listing, verify the advertised monthly rent, unit bedroom count, included and excluded utilities, lease length, deposits and recurring fees, concession timing, availability date, furnished status, and whether the address lies within the market identifier used here. Compare those property facts with the appropriate source universe: Zillow for a blended asking-rent index, ACS for survey-based occupied-household conditions, and HUD for an administrative bedroom standard. Treat ACS figures as survey estimates with their own margins of error. Recheck the listing directly because none of these sources confirms a specific unit’s current terms. The central practical question is which benchmark matches the decision being made and what the actual property documentation shows.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current index and history

Zillow’s June 2026 ZIP-level ZORI is $1,820, up 1.9% on the exact same-month comparison. The one-year pace is positive but remains below the five-year 3.5% annualized change. Complete reported history coverage, 3.0% annualized monthly-return variability, and a 3.7% maximum drawdown support a qualified read: this is a continuous backward-looking index, not a fixed property rent or forecast.

Asking rent and ACS measure different populations

The matched ZCTA’s ACS 2024 five-year median gross rent is $1,682, versus Zillow’s $1,820 asking-rent index. This is not a like-for-like gap: ACS covers occupied renter homes and selected utilities, while Zillow is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. The ZCTA is statistical geography, not the same thing as a USPS delivery ZIP.

Bedroom values are modelled

HUD’s local FY2026 bedroom ladder was used only to scale ZIP ZORI. Its outputs, from $1,316 for a studio to $2,892 for four bedrooms, are modelled estimates rather than measured rents. HUD FMR/SAFMR remains an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not an asking-rent series. The modelled two-bedroom value exceeds the supplied HUD two-bedroom standard by 21.8%.

Affordability and vacancy are area measures

The ACS matched-ZCTA screen places 40.2% of renter households at gross-rent burden of 30% or more, while annualizing the Zillow index yields a $72,800 income screen. Neither statistic determines an individual household’s affordability or eligibility. Housing counts also describe the area rather than a listing: the reported 7.8% vacancy rate cannot verify that any particular unit is vacant, rentable, or comparable.

  • Zillow ZORI is a blended typical asking-rent index rather than a list of available units. A property’s advertised price, concessions, utility treatment, and lease fees can differ materially from the index.
  • The ACS matched ZCTA is a five-year survey geography and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Its occupied-household measures have sampling uncertainty and may not align with current listings.
  • HUD standards and the derived bedroom ladder are administrative or modelled tools, not observations of asking or signed rents. Do not infer a unit’s size, condition, availability, or legal payment terms from them.
  • Area-wide vacancy and burden statistics describe reported households and units across the matched ZCTA. They cannot demonstrate that a specific vacancy exists or that any applicant will face the reported burden.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 84106

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$584,868+4.0% year over year
Homes sold151rolling three-month observation
Median days on market30 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.6resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 84106Active listings290Inventory128Pending sales161Homes sold151

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

128 observed inventory · +18.5% year over year.

Price realization

99.4% average sale-to-list ratio · 25.2% sold above original list.

Early absorption

61.5% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 30 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Salt Lake County listing conditions

3,088 active Realtor.com listings · 49 median days on market · 26.2% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Salt Lake City, UT resale supply

3.0 months of supply · 35 median days on market · 32.6% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.9% reported apartment vacancy · 39 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 84106. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What does the Zillow value represent?

At the reported June 2026 endpoint, it is Zillow’s ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index, blended across rental types. It summarizes observed asking-rent conditions for the market identifier; it does not represent a guaranteed listing price, a lease quote, a bedroom-specific measurement, or an estimate of any particular property’s final monthly cost.

How should the Zillow and ACS rent difference be interpreted?

The difference should first be treated as a source-scope difference. The ACS value is a five-year survey median for occupied renter homes in the matched ZCTA and includes selected utilities. Zillow tracks asking rents, while ACS describes occupants’ gross rent. Different timing, definitions, and geography conventions prevent using the comparison as proof of market mispricing.

How were the bedroom estimates produced?

Each bedroom estimate starts with ZIP ZORI and scales it according to the supplied local HUD ladder. The resulting figures are modelled estimates, not measured rents. HUD FMR/SAFMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard and has a different purpose from asking-rent data; therefore the output should guide comparisons of benchmarks, not assertions about a unit.

What property-level checks are still needed?

Check the listing’s advertised monthly rent, bedroom count, utility inclusions, all recurring and upfront charges, lease duration, concession expiration, availability date, and address. Then choose a benchmark whose universe fits the question: Zillow for typical asking-rent indexing, ACS for occupied-household survey conditions, and HUD for administrative bedroom standards. These checks are necessary because area aggregates do not identify unit-specific terms.