Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 49049 · population 705,400 · part of Provo, UT
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,847 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,257 | Utah County, UT | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,265 | Utah County, UT | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,460 | Utah County, UT | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $2,031 | Utah County, UT | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $2,449 | Utah County, UT | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 49049. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Utah County presents an income-versus-price tension: the Zillow county observation labeled 2026-06 shows a $549,494 median home value, up 1.83%, against published median asking rent of $1,847 per month and a 4.03% gross yield before costs. Income-oriented buyers should investigate property-level expenses and leaseable rent; buyers treating county appreciation as a substitute for cash-flow evidence should be cautious.
An effective property-tax rate of 0.44% is a carrying-cost input, though an individual bill can differ by property. HUD’s two-bedroom Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not asking rent, and cannot replace the published market rent in a gross-yield calculation. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI, labeled 2025, rose 2.81%; it is directionally consistent with Zillow’s value change but is not a home price. The methods and observation labels differ, so the rates should not be averaged or treated as the same interval.
MLS listing-market evidence calls for selective underwriting rather than a conclusion about closed-sale demand: 2,718 active listings and price reductions on 27.57% of listings document visible supply and seller concessions. QCEW reports annual covered employment at county workplaces rising; this is not resident employment or a forecast, and Education and health services is only the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Net migration of 2,719 tax-return households is positive, but entrants had lower average AGI than leavers, limiting what inflow alone establishes about purchasing power. Investor mortgages accounted for 646 of 10,298 purchases, or 6.27%, indicating participation without showing that investors dominate buyer competition.
Earthquake is the dominant hazard, while modeled expected annual building-value loss is 0.20%; that ratio is not an observed claim history or a property-specific repair estimate. Property-level seismic condition, insurance quotes and deductibles, vacancy, operating expenses, financing terms, and closed-sale comparables are not published. Their absence prevents a reliable all-in cash-flow conclusion, assessment of hazard-adjusted carrying costs, and confirmation that county-level listing and rent evidence applies to a particular asset.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
Within the selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches in Utah County, Zillow’s June 2026 ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index, runs from $1,459 in 84601 to $2,365 in 84043—a $906 spread with a $1,696.50 median. This variation makes the decision question local: can a household’s budget and unit-size requirement fit the relevant asking-rent band, rather than relying on one countywide figure? The direct set captures index conditions at distinctly different levels, but it does not quote a particular available property.
These series answer different questions and should remain separate. The ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross-rent estimate ranges from $1,178 in 84604 to $1,989 in 84043, while the county ACS median is $1,541. That survey estimate has a different concept and vintage from Zillow’s current asking-rent index. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is instead a $1,460 administrative standard across the shown ZIPs, not an asking-rent estimate. Relative to that standard, Zillow’s index is essentially at parity in 84601 (99.9%) and is 62.0% above it in 84043. This comparison is a benchmark gap, not an assertion that either series describes the rent of an equivalent unit. Households should compare a prospective unit’s current rent and bedroom configuration with the appropriate measure, without substituting historical ACS gross rent or FMR for an asking-rent observation.
Burden and vacancy offer a survey-based trade-off rather than a ranking. For the ACS measure of renter households spending 30% or more of income on rent, the reported share ranges from 34.3% in 84043 to 51.7% in 84097. The ACS vacancy estimate spans 1.6% in 84059 to 7.8% in 84604. These endpoints do not establish a causal link among rent, burden, and vacancy, nor do they identify units currently available. For a household, the practical reading is conditional: a lower burden share does not promise a lower current asking rent, and a higher vacancy estimate does not assure a suitable unit at a given price. The measures help frame search conditions alongside the separate ZORI and FMR benchmarks.
Coverage and geography constrain interpretation. The selection displays 12 of 16 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches and covers 56,980 renter households, but it is not an exhaustive inventory. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas and do not coincide exactly with USPS delivery ZIPs. Because ZIPs can cross county lines, display assignment uses the county with the largest HUD residential-address share, rather than proof that every associated address lies in Utah County. Before deciding, verify the current unit rent, bedroom count, utilities and fees, lease term, availability, address, and geographic assignment; use the applicable HUD standard only for its administrative purpose.
16 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84606 | $1,507 | $1,188 | $1,460 | 47.8% | 5.2% | $60k | 100.0% |
| 84058 | $1,551 | $1,413 | $1,460 | 44.2% | 5.2% | $62k | 100.0% |
| 84604 | $1,759 | $1,178 | $1,460 | 49.1% | 7.8% | $70k | 99.4% |
| 84043 → | $2,365 | $1,989 | $1,460 | 34.3% | 2.2% | $95k | 100.0% |
| 84601 | $1,459 | $1,208 | $1,460 | 47.0% | 4.5% | $58k | 100.0% |
| 84003 | $1,848 | $1,721 | $1,460 | 39.8% | 3.8% | $74k | 100.0% |
| 84057 | $1,478 | $1,417 | $1,460 | 39.5% | 4.7% | $59k | 100.0% |
| 84062 | $1,765 | $1,704 | $1,460 | 36.1% | 3.8% | $71k | 100.0% |
| 84663 | $1,634 | $1,576 | $1,460 | 44.7% | 3.2% | $65k | 100.0% |
| 84059 | $1,830 | $1,851 | $1,460 | 50.2% | 1.6% | $73k | 100.0% |
| 84660 | $2,093 | $1,460 | $1,460 | 40.6% | 2.9% | $84k | 100.0% |
| 84097 | $1,562 | $1,598 | $1,460 | 51.7% | 4.0% | $62k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 84043 rental reportUtah County | Lehi, UT | $2,365 | ▲ 2.7% | 34.3% | 88,390 |
| ZIP 84651 rental reportUtah County | Payson, UT | $1,704 | ▲ 1.8% | 40.0% | 29,503 |
| ZIP 84058 rental reportUtah County | Orem, UT | $1,551 | ▲ 1.0% | 44.2% | 35,099 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.197% of building value expected lost per year
$2,370 median annual bill
18,832 in · 16,113 out
$69,001 arriving · $69,411 leaving
646 of 10,298 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utah County | 705,400 | $549k | $1,847 | 4.0% | earthquake |
| Juab County | 12,586 | $460k | n/a | n/a | wildfire |
The record reports a 4.03% gross yield, defined as annual market rent before costs relative to price.
No. The record identifies HUD FMR as a payment standard, while the published rent measure is median asking rent.
Investor mortgages were 646 of 10,298 purchases, equal to 6.27%.