Counties / Utah / Grand County

Grand County, UT

FIPS 49019 · population 9,754 · outside every metro area

$586k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$586k
▼ 2.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$1,118
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,564
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+45.7%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−2.1%FHFA HPI2025+0.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$539k
Surveyed gross rent$1,118
Rent burden 30%+42.4%
Median year built1988
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
16.0%vacant
5,424estimated housing units
Occupied tenure29.7% renter
owner 70.3%renter 29.7%
Structure mix68.8% single-family
Single-family 68.8%20+ units 2.8%Mobile home 15.1%Other 13.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs6,840▼ 1.4% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments690annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$933▲ 3.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorLeisure and hospitality47.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.4%WEEKLY WAGE+3.1%Leisure and hospitality47.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Grand County presents a decision conflict: a declining Zillow home-value reading and softer listing conditions sit beside a slightly rising FHFA index, while missing market rent blocks an income test. It merits investigation by buyers able to validate lease revenue and flood costs; buyers relying on HUD FMR or broad appreciation narratives should be cautious. County evidence is screening evidence, not a property conclusion.

02Housing economics

At Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation, median home value was $585,610, down 2.13% year over year. Separately, FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.11%; it is an index rather than a home value, and its different method and vintage cannot be blended with Zillow into one appreciation rate. HUD FMR is a two-bedroom payment standard, not observed asking rent; because market rent is not published, gross yield cannot be computed. The published 0.41% effective property-tax rate is a carrying-cost input, but insurance, debt service, and maintenance are not published.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence shows 127 active listings, higher year over year, and 128 median days on market. Those figures describe visible supply and marketing time, not closed-sale prices or buyer demand by themselves. Tax-return migration had more movers leaving than entering, even though incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by $9,369; that combination does not establish tenant demand. Non-occupants took 6 of 85 purchase mortgages, indicating investor participation without revealing property-level bidder intensity.

04Risk & next checks

QCEW’s 2025 annual data recorded 6,840 average covered jobs at county workplaces, down 1.36%. This is not resident employment or unemployment. Leisure and hospitality is the largest disclosed private supersector, which identifies an important employment base rather than the whole economy. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled annual loss equal to 0.13% of building value. Property-level rent, vacancy, insurance quotes, condition, sale comparables, and flood-zone and prior-loss history are missing; their absence prevents a cash-flow, exit-price, or total-risk conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Grand County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Moab city5.3KCastle Valley town357Thompson Springs CDP0
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

3 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Moab cityIncorporated place
    5,312
  2. 02
    Castle Valley townIncorporated place
    357
  3. 03
    Thompson Springs CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.132% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.41%

$2,215 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-24

414 in · 438 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,369

$65,874 arriving · $56,505 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.1%

6 of 85 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings127▲ 8.6% year over year
Median days on market128▲ 39.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced7.7%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 3.5% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Subject-level rent, vacancy, and operating costs could differ materially from county evidence.
  2. Listing supply and marketing time may not translate into executed sale prices or lease demand.
  3. Flood exposure and insurance costs can vary by parcel beyond the county modeled loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

What prevents gross-yield calculation?

Market rent is not published, and HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than an asking-rent measure.

How is investor activity measured in the record?

It is measured through purchase mortgages to non-occupants and does not identify property-level bidder intensity.

Which hazard requires property-level diligence?

Inland flood is the named dominant hazard, and the record supplies a modeled annual building-value loss ratio.