Counties / Texas / Hood County

Hood County, TX

FIPS 48221 · population 65,894 · outside every metro area

$383k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$383k
▼ 0.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,794
▲ 3.1% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.6%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,412
market rent is 1.27x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.4%FHFA HPI2025+2.6%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$306k
Surveyed gross rent$1,428
Rent burden 30%+46.0%
Median year built1998
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
12.2%vacant
29,066estimated housing units
Occupied tenure18.8% renter
owner 81.2%renter 18.8%
Structure mix74.6% single-family
Single-family 74.6%20+ units 4.2%Mobile home 15.7%Other 5.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs18,777▲ 1.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,736annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,041▲ 5.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities23.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.3%WEEKLY WAGE+5.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities23.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Hood County is a screening case for an investor who will verify flood exposure and operating costs, not a clean appreciation thesis. Zillow’s 2026-06 median home value is $382,681, down 0.39% year over year; median asking rent is $1,794 per month, up 3.06%, and supplied gross yield is 5.63% before costs. That rent-price tension calls for property-level diligence, not a countywide growth assumption. FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.57%; its vintage and method differ from Zillow, so do not average the measures or treat HPI as a home value.

02Housing economics

Market asking rent is distinct from HUD’s payment standard. The two-bedroom FMR is $1,412, and market rent is 27.10% above it; FMR cannot replace a market-rent estimate. The effective property-tax rate is 1.05%, with median annual tax of $3,217. These costs temper gross yield, which excludes vacancy, repairs, insurance, utilities, management, financing, and other operating items. With those expenses, unit-level rent, and financing terms unpublished, net cash flow, debt coverage, and a purchase-price ceiling cannot be established.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is constructive but limited. QCEW covered employment grew 1.26% and average weekly wages grew 5.05%; these measure workplace covered jobs and wages, not resident employment or unemployment. Tax-return migration was net positive at 556, while incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by $13,634. That warrants checking tenant and buyer demand but does not establish persistence. Investor mortgages were 72 of 1,160 purchases, or 6.21%, so participation is visible but not dominant. Realtor.com’s MLS evidence shows visible supply, marketing time, and common price reductions; those measures are not closed-sale proof.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, so risk screening is central. The modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.13%; it is not a parcel flood determination, insurance quote, or dollar loss. Obtain flood-zone and elevation records, insurance terms and claims history, property-level inspection, and lease evidence before relying on gross yield. No closed-sale comparables, vacancy history, resident labor data, or metro context is supplied, preventing conclusions about achievable resale pricing, stabilized occupancy, or representativeness beyond Hood County. Verify the asset’s rent, expenses, financing, and hazard cost rather than extrapolating from county signals.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Hood County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Granbury city12.1KPecan Plantation CDP*6.5KDeCordova city3.2KOak Trail Shores CDP3KCanyon Creek CDP1.6KTolar city1.6KCresson city*1.3KStockton Bend city600
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

9 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Granbury cityIncorporated place
    12,136
  2. 02
    Pecan Plantation CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    6,452
  3. 03
    DeCordova cityIncorporated place
    3,152
  4. 04
    Oak Trail Shores CDPCensus-designated place
    3,040
  5. 05
    Canyon Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    1,646
  6. 06
    Tolar cityIncorporated place
    1,585
  7. 07
    Cresson cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    1,313
  8. 08
    Stockton Bend cityIncorporated place
    600
  9. 09
    Lipan cityIncorporated place
    490

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.130% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.05%

$3,217 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+556

2,750 in · 2,194 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$13,634

$87,825 arriving · $74,191 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.2%

72 of 1,160 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings646▼ 12.7% year over year
Median days on market59▼ 6.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced29.7%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 1.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property taxes and unreported operating costs could reduce the supplied gross yield below an acceptable net return
  2. Measured migration and covered-job growth may not translate into sustained tenant demand or resale liquidity
  3. Parcel-level flood exposure or insurance terms could be materially worse than the countywide modeled loss ratio
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the rent figure market rent or HUD FMR?

It is published median asking rent. HUD FMR is a separate two-bedroom payment standard and is not a market-rent estimate.

What does the QCEW evidence actually measure?

It measures annual covered jobs and covered-worker wages at workplaces in Hood County, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast.

Does the investor share show dominant buyer competition?

No. Investor participation is a minority of recorded purchase mortgages, so this record does not show dominant investor competition.