States / Texas
State rental intelligence

Texas rental market data

A source-traced view across 48 metro markets and 254 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

37/48 metros scored254/254 counties with FEMA risk15 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro49.0out of 100 · 37 measured metros
Texas identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$233kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,340monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield6.6%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.8%trailing 12-month metro employment
State research brief

Rents are rising faster than home values in the measured Texas metro distribution, but resale liquidity and county outcomes remain sharply uneven.

Updated 2026-07-31 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Across 48 measured metros, median home-value growth was 0.35% year over year versus 1.19% for rents. The calculated rent-minus-price gap is 0.84 percentage points, but the ranges run from -3.5% to 2.8% for prices and -2.9% to 5.6% for rents. The signal favors screening for rent support independently of appreciation rather than treating the state as one market.

Resale conditions add friction to that rent-led reading: the metro medians were 5.3 months of supply, 58 days on market, 29.1% of listings with price drops and a 96.4% sale-to-list ratio. Positive median job growth, net county migration of 56,900 and a 13.5% calculated premium of the median rent-versus-FMR ratio over 1.0 provide demand and pricing context, but neither establishes property-level occupancy or net cash flow.

01

Metro median rent growth of 1.19% exceeded median home-value growth of 0.35%, a calculated 0.84-percentage-point gap → test rent support separately from appreciation assumptions.

02

Median resale conditions were 5.3 months of supply, 58 days on market, 29.1% price drops and a 96.4% sale-to-list ratio → underwrite local exit timing and negotiation rather than a state-level liquidity assumption.

03

Median metro job growth was 0.8% and county net migration was 56,900 across 245 counties → verify that the target property's employment base and renter demand match the broader movement signal.

04

The median rent-versus-FMR ratio was 1.135, calculated as 13.5% above 1.0, while median gross yield was 6.58% → test tenant affordability, rent-standard relevance and net expenses before relying on gross yield.

05

Leading-hazard labels include 212 inland-flood counties, while county effective tax rates range from 0.89% to 1.61% → add property-level hazard, insurance and tax checks to acquisition screening.

01
Price and rent momentum

Rent growth leads value growth, with unusually wide local spreads

The measured metro medians show a rent-led split: home values rose 0.35% year over year while rents rose 1.19%. The supplied rent-minus-price figure, also a calculated difference between those medians, is 0.84 percentage points. That spread is not universal: price growth ranged from -3.5% to 2.8%, while rent growth ranged from -2.9% to 5.6%.

Local examples reinforce the need for deal-level validation. Abilene recorded 7.0% price growth and 41.4% rent growth; Kingsville recorded 2.8% and 9.6%; and Lufkin recorded -0.6% and 7.4%, respectively. These are measured market examples, not state averages, and the rent gap should be tested against current occupancy and achievable rents.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Supply and resale conditions

A middling resale median conceals both fast and slow exits

Across 44 metros with months-of-supply and days-on-market readings, the medians were 5.3 months and 58 days. The measured price-drop median was 29.1% across 44 metros, and the sale-to-list median was 96.4% across 39. The ranges were broad: 3.4 to 10.0 months of supply and 42 to 97 days on market. That combination argues for underwriting exit liquidity locally rather than relying on the state distribution.

Abilene is a counter-signal to the slower-market cases, with 1.5 months of supply and 24 days on market. Eagle Pass had 10.0 months of supply and 167 days on market, while Jacksonville had 5.8 months, 135 days and a 93.9% sale-to-list ratio. The same state therefore contains both relatively quick resale conditions and markets where pricing or timing may require more flexibility.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

03
Employment and household movement

Employment is broadly positive, but statewide movement does not locate renter demand

Median metro job growth was 0.8% year over year across 48 metros, with a range from -0.9% to 2.1%. County records show 56,900 net migrants and 1.88 net migrants per 1,000 residents, with migration measured in 245 counties. Those readings support checking employment and household movement in the target locality, but county totals do not identify which metro, neighborhood or renter segment receives the flow.

The selected markets show why yield and employment should be screened together. Stephenville posted 4.4% job growth with a 3.3% gross yield, while Borger posted 4.0% job growth with an 8.7% gross yield. Bay City also had 3.9% job growth but a 5.4% gross yield. Job growth is therefore a demand input, not a substitute for local rent, price and tenant-income checks.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Entry cost and affordability

Local rent standards and investment math vary materially by metro

The measured metro rent median was $1,339.50, compared with a $1,167 median two-bedroom FMR. The rent-versus-FMR ratio median was 1.135, which is a calculated 13.5% above 1.0; the distribution ranged from 86.8% to 143.4% of FMR. Median rent-to-income was 24.6%, with a range of 20.3% to 31.5%, so affordability and rent-standard support differ by market.

The metro gross-yield median was 6.58%, ranging from 5.48% to 8.59%, while the price-to-income median was 3.69, ranging from 2.92 to 4.93. Kingsville's measured gross yield was 11.51% with rent-to-income of 27.92%; Abilene's was 10.56% with rent-to-income of 34.48%; and Plainview's was 9.33% with rent-to-income of 21.56%. These are gross, market-level measures and do not establish net operating cash flow.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

05
County market dispersion

County data turn the metro rent lead into a wider market divergence

Among 243 counties with measured price growth, the median was -0.34% year over year. Among 71 counties with measured rent growth, the median was 0.89%. The calculated rent-minus-price difference is therefore 1.23 percentage points, while county price growth ranged from -4.9% to 5.9% and rent growth ranged from -2.3% to 5.9%. This is a broader and more uneven version of the metro-level rent-price split.

A separate FHFA series provides a counter-signal: its county annual-appreciation median was 2.09%, and its five-year median was 49.11%, across 171 and 174 measured counties respectively. The disagreement with the county price-growth median indicates that measurement coverage and series construction matter; it does not resolve which measure applies to a specific property or establish a future appreciation path.

Evidence: FHFA House Price Index — annual county appreciation · Realtor.com Economic Research — county listing inventory · Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rents

06
Physical risk and property tax

Hazard and tax burdens can change the screen even where rents look strong

The packet's mutually exclusive leading-hazard context reports 212 counties labeled inland flood, 19 hurricane, 11 wildfire and 7 hail. These are county-level leading-hazard labels, not parcel-level exposure. County climate-loss ratios had a 0.13% median, from 0.09% at the tenth percentile to 0.21% at the ninetieth percentile. A Red River County example was 0.83%, materially above that measured distribution, while Matagorda County was 0.38%.

Effective property-tax rates had a 1.18% county median, ranging from 0.89% to 1.61%, and median taxes ranged from $1,104.90 to $3,939.80 around a $1,897 median. El Paso County's measured tax rate was 2.03% with a $3,660 median tax; Red River County's rate was 1.01% and Matagorda County's was 1.35%. The packet does not include property-specific insurance premiums, deductibles, flood-zone status or a final tax bill, so these figures are screening inputs rather than complete expense estimates.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

Evidence selected for Texas

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-3.5%0.4%2.8%Asking-rent change-2.9%1.2%5.6%Rent minus price0.8%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.53.18.6Months of supply3.4×5.3×10.0×Days on market42 days58 days97 daysListings with cuts20.6%29.1%35.5%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.9%0.8%2.1%Net migration / 1k1.9Net household movement56,900
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution37 scored metros · median 49.0
00–19720–392340–59760–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
38%96/254Rent100%254/254Climate96%245/254Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Kingsville11.5%Abilene10.6%Plainview9.3%Mount Pleasant8.8%Borger8.7%Wichita Falls8.5%Del Rio8.3%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Texas

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Stephenville, TX68$347k$9563.3%▲ 4.4%
2Kingsville, TX67$149k$1,42611.5%▲ 1.4%
3Amarillo, TX65$222k$1,2826.9%▲ 0.8%
4Gainesville, TX65$323k$1,7416.5%▲ 1.4%
5Corsicana, TX64$233k$1,2416.4%▲ 1.2%
6San Angelo, TX64$234k$1,3066.7%▲ 0.3%
7Abilene, TX63$220k$1,93510.6%▲ 0.8%
8Tyler, TX59$274k$1,4266.3%▲ 1.5%
9Wichita Falls, TX59$179k$1,2778.5%▼ 0.3%
10El Paso, TX55$233k$1,5287.9%▲ 0.6%
11Athens, TX53$273k$1,2925.7%▲ 1.8%
12Sherman, TX53$290k$1,3355.5%▲ 1.7%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 48. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Texas

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Harris County, TX4,838,303$282k$1,6006.8%inland flooding
Dallas County, TX2,621,179$312k$1,6466.3%inland flooding
Tarrant County, TX2,167,390$326k$1,6396.0%inland flooding
Bexar County, TX2,067,341$257k$1,3896.5%inland flooding
Travis County, TX1,330,015$476k$1,6494.2%inland flooding
Collin County, TX1,163,337$487k$1,7364.3%inland flooding
Denton County, TX979,561$444k$1,7064.6%inland flooding
Fort Bend County, TX893,767$383k$1,9916.2%inland flooding
Hidalgo County, TX891,977$195k$1,1146.9%hurricane
El Paso County, TX870,779$233k$1,5287.9%inland flooding
Montgomery County, TX684,432$347k$1,7336.0%inland flooding
Williamson County, TX672,688$405k$1,6855.0%inland flooding
County yield sample96/254counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+56,900IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share7.3%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Sources used in this analysis

Measured releases, not a global source count

Only sources supporting the selected evidence modules are listed here.

Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Rent-growth coverage is incomplete relative to current rent coverage: 37 metros have rent-growth readings versus 48 rent observations, and 71 counties have rent-growth readings versus 96 county-rent observations. The rent-led thesis may not describe unmeasured localities.
  2. County migration and AGI totals show aggregate movement but do not identify the metro, neighborhood or tenant segment receiving those households, so statewide demand may not translate to the target property.
  3. Gross yields omit financing, taxes, insurance, repairs, vacancy and management costs. The packet therefore cannot establish net operating income or cash-on-cash performance.
  4. The county price-growth median is negative while the separate FHFA annual-appreciation median is positive, showing that the conclusion is sensitive to the selected price series and coverage.
  5. FEMA's leading-hazard label and loss ratio are county-level measures, not parcel-level exposure, and the packet lacks insurance quotes, deductibles and property-specific mitigation data.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Is the rent-led split broad enough to support a state-level underwriting assumption?

It is visible in the measured medians: rent growth was 1.19% versus 0.35% for home values, with a calculated 0.84-percentage-point gap. However, rent-growth coverage includes 37 metros and 71 counties, and both price and rent ranges include negative readings. Use it as a screening signal, not a universal assumption.

What does the resale market imply about exit liquidity?

The measured metro medians were 5.3 months of supply, 58 days on market, 29.1% price drops and a 96.4% sale-to-list ratio. Conditions vary substantially: Abilene had 1.5 months and 24 days, while Eagle Pass had 10.0 months and 167 days. The target locality needs its own exit check.

Do jobs and migration provide enough evidence of tenant demand?

Median metro job growth was 0.8%, and counties recorded 56,900 net migrants with migration measured in 245 counties. Those are supportive aggregate signals, but they do not locate demand at the property level or establish renter income, household formation or occupancy.

Can the measured gross yields be treated as net investment returns?

No. The metro gross-yield median was 6.58%, with a 5.48% to 8.59% range, but the packet does not provide complete property-level operating costs, financing, insurance, repairs or vacancy assumptions.

How should hazard and tax data affect screening?

Use them as separate local filters. The context reports 212 inland-flood, 19 hurricane, 11 wildfire and 7 hail leading-hazard labels, while effective tax rates range from 0.89% to 1.61%. Neither the hazard labels nor county tax distributions establishes a parcel-specific insurance cost, exposure or tax bill.