States / Texas
State rental intelligence

Texas rental market data

A source-traced view across 48 metro markets and 254 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

37/48 metros scored254/254 counties with FEMA risk15 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro49.0out of 100 · 37 measured metros
Texas identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$233kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,340monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield6.6%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.8%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Texas rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,2282026-07 · ▼ 2.8% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index8.8%2026-07 · −0.0 pp in 12 months
Time on market34 days2026-07 · +1 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,489$1,246$1,003Rental Vacancy Index9.7%6.4%3.2%2017-012021-102026-07TexasUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rents fell 2.8% even as migration stayed positive and measured metro asking rents edged up, making local rent validation the central Texas screen.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Texas rental evidence does not move in one direction. Apartment List's July 2026 recent-lease rent was $1,228, down 2.8% from $1,263 a year earlier. Its separate Vacancy Index was 8.8% and nearly flat, while its separate time-on-market measure lengthened 1.3 days to 34.3. The combination signals weaker rent realization without establishing a broad occupancy decline.

The counter-signal is local and demand-related. Among 37 metros with Zillow asking-rent growth, the median increase was 1.2%; the median home-value change across 48 metros was 0.4%. IRS county flows produced net migration of 56,900 across 245 counties, while measured metro job growth had a 0.8% median. Because these sources cover different concepts, geographies and periods, screening should require property-level achieved rents, concessions, vacancy and expenses. The packet cannot establish that any property shares the state recent-lease trend or that migration has converted into rental absorption.

01

Apartment List recent-lease rent fell 2.8%, time on market rose 1.3 days and vacancy was nearly flat → do not assume rent growth without local achieved-rent evidence

02

Zillow metro rent growth ranged from negative 2.9% to positive 5.6% between the 10th and 90th percentiles → statewide and metro medians are insufficient for comp selection

03

Measured resale conditions had medians of 5.3 months of supply and a 29.1% price-drop share → screen exit timing and likely resale negotiation separately from rental demand

04

Net migration was positive by 56,900 and median metro job growth was 0.8% → demand is a genuine counter-signal, but it must be tied to local occupancy and collections

05

Metro gross yields ranged from 5.5% to 8.6% between the 10th and 90th percentiles while county tax rates ranged from 0.89% to 1.61% → rank opportunities on property-level net economics rather than gross yield

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Recent-lease rents weakened while Texas vacancy barely moved

Apartment List's July 2026 recent-lease rent fell 2.8% year over year to $1,228. The decline was 1.7 percentage points steeper than the measured national decline of 1.1%. Texas's separate Vacancy Index was 8.8%, essentially unchanged from a year earlier, but 1.7 percentage points above the national measure.

The separate listing-liquidity series moved more clearly: time on market rose 1.3 days to 34.3 days, which was 4.3 days longer than the national measure. These three series should not be blended into one vacancy or rent metric, but together they argue against assuming near-term rent growth without local achieved-rent evidence.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Metro asking-rent gains hide a wide and unusual spread

Zillow's median asking-rent change was 1.2% across 37 measured metros, versus a 0.4% median home-value increase across 48 metros. The packet reports a 0.8-percentage-point rent-over-price median gap. Dispersion matters more than that midpoint: metro rent changes ran from negative 2.9% at the 10th percentile to positive 5.6% at the 90th, while home-value changes ranged from negative 3.5% to positive 2.8%.

The named markets sit beyond those broad ranges. Abilene's asking rent increased 41.4% while its home value rose 7.0%; Kingsville recorded 9.6% rent growth and 2.8% value growth; Lufkin recorded 7.4% rent growth while value fell 0.6%. These are leads for comp-level investigation, not defensible run-rate assumptions. They also do not contradict the Apartment List state decline because Zillow measures metro market rents rather than the state recent-lease series.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Supply and resale conditions

Exit liquidity runs from tight Abilene to 10 months in Eagle Pass

Across 44 metros with Redfin supply data, the median was 5.3 months of supply, 58 days on market and a 29.1% price-drop share. The 10th-to-90th percentile range stretched from 3.4 to 10.0 months of supply and from 42 to 97.3 days on market, indicating materially different resale exits across measured metros.

Abilene was a tight counterexample, with 1.5 months of supply and 24 days on market even as the permit series reported 2,484 units, or 13.8 per 1,000 residents. Eagle Pass had 10.0 months of supply and 167 days on market, although only 15.0% of listings showed price drops. Permits do not identify completed units or rental tenure, and resale conditions do not establish rental lease-up, so each belongs in a separate part of the screen.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Employment and household movement

Positive migration and jobs do not guarantee strong unit economics

The measured demand indicators are a real counter-signal to rental softness. IRS flows showed net migration of 56,900 across 245 counties, equal to 1.9 per 1,000 residents, and inbound aggregate adjusted gross income exceeded outbound income by $1.2 million in the supplied series. Across 48 metros, job growth had a 0.8% median, with a range from negative 0.9% at the 10th percentile to positive 2.1% at the 90th.

Local economics still diverged among the named high-job-growth markets. Stephenville had 4.4% job growth but a 3.3% gross yield; Borger had 4.0% job growth and an 8.7% yield; Bay City had 3.9% job growth and a 5.4% yield. Demand measures can keep a market in the screening funnel, but they do not establish occupancy, rent collection or an adequate return. The IRS migration period also predates the 2026 rental measures.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

05
Entry cost and affordability

High headline yields come with unequal market-level rent burdens

Gross yields across 48 metros had a 6.6% median and a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 5.5% to 8.6%. Kingsville screened at an 11.5% gross yield on a $148,688 value and $1,426 monthly rent, with a 27.9% market-level rent-to-income ratio. Abilene showed a 10.6% yield on $219,823 and $1,935, but its rent-to-income ratio was higher at 34.5%.

Plainview combined a 9.3% gross yield with a lower 21.6% rent-to-income ratio, based on a $121,874 value and $947 rent. These comparisons help separate entry price from affordability pressure, but gross yield excludes vacancy, taxes, insurance, maintenance, management and capital spending. It is therefore a first-pass screen rather than a net-return measure.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income and gross rent · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

06
Physical risk and property tax

County tax and hazard dispersion can overturn a gross-yield screen

Effective property-tax rates across 250 measured counties had a 1.18% median and a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 0.89% to 1.61%. The named higher-rate counties were El Paso County at 2.03%, Menard County at 1.95% and Mitchell County at 1.86%. Those differences are large enough to change the ranking produced by gross yield alone.

The median modeled climate loss ratio across 254 counties was 0.131%, with a 90th-percentile value of 0.211%. Red River County measured 0.829%, Matagorda County 0.384% and Kenedy County 0.349%. Among the four leading-hazard labels supplied, inland flood led in 212 counties, hurricane in 19, wildfire in 11 and hail in 7. Each is one mutually exclusive county-level leading label; none establishes parcel exposure or an insurance premium.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Texas

The distribution uses 35 current published ZIP reports across 19 cities and 13 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,051$2,545full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income22.3%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▼ 0.7%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered402,182across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.75035$2,54578704$1,86477494$1,84075052$1,66675215$1,62175063$1,59977092$1,53979936$1,48078666$1,39578216$1,13277081$1,10475243$1,051
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.64.7%56.8%48.9%41.0%33.1%786667524378704770817821677494750527506379936770927503575215Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.4.4%3.5%2.7%1.8%0.9%786667524378704770817821677494750527506379936770927503575215Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the current published direct-evidence Texas ZIP reports, Zillow’s ZORI observed asking-rent index ranges from $1,051 to $2,545, a $1,494 spread around a $1,580 median. The practical question is therefore not whether the state has a single rent level, but how a household’s budget fits the markedly uneven set of published reports. This statewide distribution contains 35 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, rather than every ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property in Texas. It describes asking-rent index observations and should not be read as a measure of signed leases, the full stock of units, or a statewide average. It instead supplies a comparative starting point for examining reported differences within the available evidence.

At the median report, the current asking-rent-to-median-income comparison is 22.3%, with a range from 14.8% to 42.7%. That comparison places a current Zillow asking-rent index beside ACS ZCTA median household income, a five-year survey estimate; it screens the relationship between area income and the index, not the share of individual renters facing high gross-rent burdens. Separately, the ACS renter-household share spending at least 30% of income on gross rent has a 49.2% median and ranges from 35.6% to 62.2%. Gross rent and the observed asking-rent index are also not interchangeable. A favorable-looking area income ratio can coexist with a substantial renter burden, so the measures should remain distinct in household budgeting or area comparisons.

Momentum also needs separate treatment from rent variability. Direct monthly Zillow history produces a median annual growth rate of -0.7%, but the published-report range runs from -7.6% to +6.6%. The distribution has 22 cooling reports and 11 accelerating reports, a counter-signal to any single statewide direction. Its annualized volatility has a 2.8% median, from 1.9% to 3.4%, indicating meaningful variation in the size of month-to-month index changes even when annual movement is modest. Growth measures direction over the stated window; volatility measures dispersion in the monthly series. Neither metric is a forecast, and a positive or negative annual change alone does not establish whether future asking rents will be steady.

HUD offers a different reference point: its two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom standard rather than an observed asking rent. Across the published reports, direct asking rent is 86.2% of that HUD two-bedroom benchmark at the median, ranging from 57.7% to 136.8%. This ratio can position a ZIP report relative to a standardized program benchmark, but it cannot establish what any available apartment should cost. ZORI is not matched to a particular property’s bedroom count, size, condition, lease term, utility treatment, or concessions. ACS measures are likewise ZCTA-level estimates, and ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than identical USPS delivery ZIPs; those geographic and measurement limits rule out property-level conclusions.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 35 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
78666San Marcos$1,395▼ 2.1%30.6%59.2%3.0%▲ 94.3%
75243Dallas$1,051▼ 3.6%23.5%58.3%2.7%▲ 57.7%
78704Austin$1,864▼ 1.4%20.9%37.0%2.8%▲ 100.6%
77081Houston$1,104▼ 0.6%30.6%50.7%3.4%▲ 82.4%
78216San Antonio$1,132▼ 7.6%23.0%57.3%3.2%▲ 76.0%
77494Katy$1,840▼ 2.7%14.8%50.5%2.0%▲ 78.0%
75052Grand Prairie$1,666▼ 0.6%22.4%62.2%1.9%▲ 79.3%
75063Irving$1,599▲ 0.7%16.4%35.6%2.6%▲ 69.2%
79936El Paso$1,480▲ 3.7%26.4%49.2%2.6%▲ 136.8%
77092Houston$1,539▲ 4.5%31.4%55.2%3.4%▲ 111.5%
75035Frisco$2,545▼ 0.2%18.3%40.6%2.2%▲ 91.5%
75215Dallas$1,621▲ 6.6%42.7%52.6%3.0%▲ 105.3%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index, not a record of executed leases or a bedroom-matched quote for a particular unit. The statewide distribution includes only current published direct-evidence ZIP reports and therefore excludes unreported ZIPs, neighborhoods, and properties.

ACS figures are five-year survey estimates reported for ZCTAs, which are statistical areas and not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR values are administrative two-bedroom standards, so neither series should be treated as a property-specific asking-rent observation.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Texas

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-3.5%0.4%2.8%Asking-rent change-2.9%1.2%5.6%Rent minus price0.8%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.53.18.6Months of supply3.4×5.3×10.0×Days on market42 days58 days97 daysListings with cuts20.6%29.1%35.5%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.9%0.8%2.1%Net migration / 1k1.9Net household movement56,900
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution37 scored metros · median 49.0
00–19720–392340–59760–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
38%96/254Rent100%254/254Climate96%245/254Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Kingsville11.5%Abilene10.6%Plainview9.3%Mount Pleasant8.8%Borger8.7%Wichita Falls8.5%Del Rio8.3%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Texas

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Stephenville, TX68$347k$9563.3%▲ 4.4%
2Kingsville, TX67$149k$1,42611.5%▲ 1.4%
3Amarillo, TX65$222k$1,2826.9%▲ 0.8%
4Gainesville, TX65$323k$1,7416.5%▲ 1.4%
5Corsicana, TX64$233k$1,2416.4%▲ 1.2%
6San Angelo, TX64$234k$1,3066.7%▲ 0.3%
7Abilene, TX63$220k$1,93510.6%▲ 0.8%
8Tyler, TX59$274k$1,4266.3%▲ 1.5%
9Wichita Falls, TX59$179k$1,2778.5%▼ 0.3%
10El Paso, TX55$233k$1,5287.9%▲ 0.6%
11Athens, TX53$273k$1,2925.7%▲ 1.8%
12Sherman, TX53$290k$1,3355.5%▲ 1.7%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 48. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Texas

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Harris County, TX4,838,303$282k$1,6006.8%inland flooding
Dallas County, TX2,621,179$312k$1,6466.3%inland flooding
Tarrant County, TX2,167,390$326k$1,6396.0%inland flooding
Bexar County, TX2,067,341$257k$1,3896.5%inland flooding
Travis County, TX1,330,015$476k$1,6494.2%inland flooding
Collin County, TX1,163,337$487k$1,7364.3%inland flooding
Denton County, TX979,561$444k$1,7064.6%inland flooding
Fort Bend County, TX893,767$383k$1,9916.2%inland flooding
Hidalgo County, TX891,977$195k$1,1146.9%hurricane
El Paso County, TX870,779$233k$1,5287.9%inland flooding
Montgomery County, TX684,432$347k$1,7336.0%inland flooding
Williamson County, TX672,688$405k$1,6855.0%inland flooding
County yield sample96/254counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+56,900IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share7.3%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. The central rent asymmetry may reflect measurement differences: Apartment List tracks a state recent-lease series, while Zillow tracks metro asking rents, so the two cannot be treated as the same rent market.
  2. Coverage is incomplete and uneven: metro rent growth is available for 37 of 48 metros, Redfin supply and price-drop measures cover 44, and the state Apartment List series provides no metro split in this packet.
  3. The demand indicators are not synchronized with the rental evidence: IRS migration covers 2022-2023, income inputs use ACS 2024 five-year data, and the direct rental measures are from July 2026.
  4. Gross yields omit vacancy, concessions, taxes, insurance, maintenance, management and capital costs, so the apparent advantage of named high-yield markets may disappear in net underwriting.
  5. The four supplied FEMA leading-hazard counts total 249, a calculated five-county shortfall from Texas's 254 counties; the remaining leading labels are not identified, and no parcel exposure or insurance quote is provided.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Is Texas rent growing now?

The answer depends on the measure. Apartment List's July 2026 state recent-lease rent fell 2.8% to $1,228, while Zillow's median metro asking-rent change was positive 1.2% across 37 metros. The packet does not support treating either result as every locality's trend.

Do positive migration and job figures offset the recent-lease rent decline?

They are a counter-signal, not an offset that can be quantified. Net migration was 56,900 across 245 counties and median metro job growth was 0.8%, but the packet does not show how those measures converted into rental occupancy, household formation or rent collection.

Does Abilene's permit volume prove that rental oversupply is coming?

No. Abilene reported 2,484 permitted units, or 13.8 per 1,000 residents, but permits do not establish completion or rental tenure. Its measured resale market was currently tight at 1.5 months of supply and 24 days on market.

How do the named high-yield screens differ on affordability?

Kingsville showed an 11.5% gross yield and a 27.9% rent-to-income ratio; Abilene showed 10.6% and 34.5%; Plainview showed 9.3% and 21.6%. These are market-level screens, not tenant-level payment histories or net returns.

Can the county tax and hazard data price a property's operating risk?

No. County tax rates and modeled climate loss ratios show dispersion, but the FEMA label is only the county's leading hazard and does not establish parcel exposure. Exact assessment, insurance, flood-zone and property-condition data remain necessary.