Counties / Texas / Denton County

Denton County, TX

FIPS 48121 · population 979,561 · part of Dallas, TX

$444k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Denton County, TX?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,706 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,7062026-06 · down 1.1% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,728ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,931FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Denton County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,582Denton County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,648Denton County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,931Denton County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,431Denton County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$3,091Denton County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$444k
▼ 4.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,706
▼ 1.1% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.6%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,931
market rent is 0.88x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+45.7%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−4.2%FHFA HPI2025−0.9%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$437k
Surveyed gross rent$1,728
Rent burden 30%+51.2%
Median year built2003
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
4.3%vacant
376,754estimated housing units
Occupied tenure34.5% renter
owner 65.5%renter 34.5%
Structure mix71.6% single-family
Single-family 71.6%20+ units 12.0%Mobile home 2.4%Other 14.0%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs319,964▲ 2.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments20,990annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,307▲ 3.6% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities27.4% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+2.0%WEEKLY WAGE+3.6%Trade, transportation, and utilities27.4%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Denton CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$45k$90k196919972024$3k$80k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Denton CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI17,99086.1% burdened30–50% HAMFI15,99592.0% burdened50–80% HAMFI27,54060.8% burdened80–100% HAMFI14,33023.7% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI40,6904.0% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Denton County, TX

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 48121. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,602$1,491$1,3792021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,3892026-07 · -4.3% year over year
Rental vacancy10.0%2026-07 · +0.5 percentage points year over year
Time on market38 days2026-07 · +5.6 days year over year
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Denton County presents an income-versus-carrying-cost decision, not a straightforward appreciation case. Zillow’s 2026-06 median home value is $444,495, down 4.19% year over year, while published median asking rent is $1,706 and gross yield is 4.61% before costs. FHFA’s separate 2025 repeat-transaction HPI fell 0.88% year over year; it is an index, not a home value, and its vintage and method should not be blended with Zillow’s. An income-focused investor should investigate selectively; a buyer relying on appreciation should be cautious because the two measures both point to recent softness.

02Housing economics

Market rent is 88.30% of HUD’s $1,931 two-bedroom FMR, but FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The 1.61% effective property-tax rate and $7,055 median annual tax are material carrying-cost inputs. The record omits insurance, repairs, vacancy, management, utilities, financing, and acquisition costs, so the 4.61% figure cannot become a net yield or cash-on-cash result. Price falling faster than asking rent can lift gross yield mechanically; it does not prove durable rental demand.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. Realtor.com shows visible supply, marketing time, price reductions, and pending activity, but these MLS measures are not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand; its price-reduced share is 28.46% and pending ratio is 41.62%. Net migration is 6,577 tax-return households, while average AGI is $101,307 for movers in versus $86,709 for movers out. QCEW reports annual covered county jobs and covered-worker wages, with both growing; its largest disclosed private supersector is trade, transportation, and utilities. These signals support a demand investigation, not a claim about the Dallas metro or a particular property.

04Risk & next checks

Flood diligence is central: the modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.12%, and inland flood is the dominant hazard. That model is not a property-level flood determination, insurance quote, or premium estimate. Investor participation is 7.65% of 17,798 total purchase mortgages, which does not by itself establish competition or liquidity. Next checks are parcel-level flood zone, elevation, drainage and claims history; insurance terms; closed-sale comps; rent comps and lease-up; and a full operating and financing budget. Missing property-level hazard, closed-sale, and expense data prevent conclusions on net return, insurability, and exit value.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Denton County, TX

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,289$2,323Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$1,034highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range39.4%60.8%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered102,397across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.75068$2,32376227$1,86675056$1,81875033$1,81875007$1,77875010$1,77375057$1,59175067$1,46776201$1,44776209$1,40176205$1,33875287$1,289
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.63.3%56.7%50.1%43.5%36.9%752877506775056762017500775010762097503376227750687505776205Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.75007+89.3%76201+88.2%75068+86.7%75056+81.9%76209+80.5%75010+79.9%75057+79.5%76205+78.2%76227+75.5%75033+71.3%75067+70.9%75287+60.0%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Across the 12 selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches, covering 102,397 renter households, Zillow’s June 2026 typical observed asking-rent index ranges from $1,289 to $2,323, with a $1,682 median and $1,034 spread. Denton County’s county-level ZORI is $1,706. This distribution makes the practical question less about a single county rent and more about whether a search can accept the lower, middle, or upper observed price bands and their current listing choices. Annual ZORI movement also ranges from a 6.9% decline to a 4.8% increase, versus a county change of -1.1%, so the county direction should not substitute for individual-market screening.

Do not turn the price series into one composite rent. Zillow’s county index is a current typical observed asking-rent measure, while the ACS 2024 five-year county median gross rent of $1,728 is a survey estimate for a different reference concept. HUD’s FY 2026 two-bedroom FMR is $1,931 at county scale and runs from $1,640 to $2,680 among the shown ZIPs. The observed Zillow-to-local HUD two-bedroom ratios run from 60.0% to 89.3%. Those percentages describe position relative to an administrative bedroom-specific standard; they are not a market-rent discount, a lease-price comparison, or a measure of eligibility. Use ZORI to orient an asking-rent search, ACS to describe household conditions, and HUD for program-standard context.

ACS 2024 five-year estimates identify material strain across selected ZCTAs: the share of renter households spending at least 30% of income on gross rent ranges from 39.4% to 60.8%, compared with 51.2% countywide. Vacancy ranges from 3.6% to 9.0%, versus 4.3% countywide. These are distinct signals: burden records a household-income-and-rent condition, whereas vacancy measures vacant housing at the survey reference. The selected area at the high end of burden also has the high vacancy rate, illustrating why a larger vacancy reading cannot be treated as proof of a lower-cost or suitable currently listed unit. Screen both conditions alongside the actual unit rather than assuming a trade-off.

Coverage and geography limit precision. The table selection shows 12 of 23 eligible direct-ZORI matches and is ordered by renter households; it is not a countywide inventory, and no separate ZIP reports were published in this packet. County display assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address share, which spans 49.7% to 100% here; 75287 therefore deserves especially careful county-boundary interpretation. ACS figures attach to Census ZCTAs—statistical approximations of ZIP-like areas—not USPS delivery ZIP service areas. Before choosing a property, verify the live advertised rent, bedroom count, lease term, utilities, deposits and fees, vacancy or availability, and any applicable HUD program limits.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

23 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
75287$1,289$1,472$2,15052.6%7.8%$52k49.7%
75067$1,467$1,573$2,07051.7%5.2%$59k99.3%
75056$1,818$1,902$2,22039.4%3.6%$73k100.0%
76201$1,447$1,164$1,64060.8%9.0%$58k100.0%
75007$1,778$1,668$1,99049.6%4.2%$71k91.1%
75010$1,773$1,854$2,22045.8%5.6%$71k100.0%
76209$1,401$1,444$1,74052.4%6.7%$56k100.0%
75033$1,818$2,056$2,55044.0%4.4%$73k70.7%
76227$1,866$2,055$2,47049.6%3.7%$75k100.0%
75068$2,323$2,289$2,68040.5%4.1%$93k100.0%
75057$1,591$1,735$2,00042.8%4.1%$64k100.0%
76205$1,338$1,423$1,71058.6%7.8%$54k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

Census ZCTA estimates are tabulated for statistical areas designed to approximate ZIP geography, while USPS delivery ZIPs are operational mail-service areas. Consequently, ACS household, income, burden, and vacancy figures may not align exactly with the displayed ZIP labels or their delivery boundaries.

County placement uses HUD’s largest residential-address-share crosswalk, not a guarantee that every address in a displayed ZIP lies in Denton County. The selected direct-evidence set is deliberately limited rather than exhaustive, so absent ZIPs should not be read as having no rental options or no relevance.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Denton County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Dallas city*1.3MFort Worth city*963.2KPlano city*290.6KFrisco city*219.3KDenton city152.9KCarrollton city*133.7KLewisville city*131.1KFlower Mound town*78.4K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

49 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Dallas cityIncorporated place · spans 5 counties
    1,307,930
  2. 02
    Fort Worth cityIncorporated place · spans 5 counties
    963,194
  3. 03
    Plano cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    290,594
  4. 04
    Frisco cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    219,304
  5. 05
    Denton cityIncorporated place
    152,866
  6. 06
    Carrollton cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    133,740
  7. 07
    Lewisville cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    131,080
  8. 08
    Flower Mound townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    78,389
  9. 09
    Little Elm cityIncorporated place
    54,820
  10. 10
    Grapevine cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    51,139
  11. 11
    The Colony cityIncorporated place
    45,454
  12. 12
    Coppell cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    42,154
Show 37 more places
  1. 13
    Prosper townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    37,869
  2. 14
    Celina cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    34,268
  3. 15
    Southlake cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    31,137
  4. 16
    Corinth cityIncorporated place
    23,385
  5. 17
    Highland Village cityIncorporated place
    16,101
  6. 18
    Trophy Club townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    13,733
  7. 19
    Lantana CDPCensus-designated place
    12,766
  8. 20
    Roanoke cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    10,286
  9. 21
    Sanger cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    9,641
  10. 22
    Paloma Creek South CDPCensus-designated place
    8,860
  11. 23
    Providence Village townIncorporated place
    8,721
  12. 24
    Northlake townIncorporated place
    8,283
  13. 25
    Lake Dallas cityIncorporated place
    7,822
  14. 26
    Aubrey cityIncorporated place
    7,396
  15. 27
    Savannah CDPCensus-designated place
    6,469
  16. 28
    Krum cityIncorporated place
    6,189
  17. 29
    Oak Point cityIncorporated place
    5,887
  18. 30
    Hickory Creek townIncorporated place
    5,611
  19. 31
    Justin cityIncorporated place
    5,447
  20. 32
    Argyle cityIncorporated place
    5,371
  21. 33
    Pilot Point cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    5,332
  22. 34
    Haslet cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    3,280
  23. 35
    Double Oak townIncorporated place
    3,071
  24. 36
    Paloma Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    3,016
  25. 37
    Hackberry townIncorporated place
    2,979
  26. 38
    Shady Shores townIncorporated place
    2,922
  27. 39
    Ponder townIncorporated place
    2,626
  28. 40
    Copper Canyon townIncorporated place
    2,514
  29. 41
    Bartonville townIncorporated place
    2,112
  30. 42
    Cross Roads townIncorporated place
    2,035
  31. 43
    Westlake townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,670
  32. 44
    Krugerville cityIncorporated place
    1,577
  33. 45
    New Fairview cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,570
  34. 46
    Lakewood Village cityIncorporated place
    627
  35. 47
    DISH townIncorporated place
    541
  36. 48
    Hebron townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    253
  37. 49
    Corral City townIncorporated place
    7

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.124% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.61%

$7,055 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+6,577

44,763 in · 38,186 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$14,598

$101,307 arriving · $86,709 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.6%

1,362 of 17,798 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings4,685▲ 1.0% year over year
Median days on market47▲ 3.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced28.5%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 1.1% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Dallas, TX

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Denton County979,561$444k$1,7064.6%inland flooding
Dallas County2,621,179$312k$1,6466.3%inland flooding
Tarrant County2,167,390$326k$1,6396.0%inland flooding
Collin County1,163,337$487k$1,7364.3%inland flooding
Ellis County213,160$376k$1,8275.8%inland flooding
Johnson County195,597$344k$1,5735.5%inland flooding
Kaufman County172,604$300k$1,8567.4%inland flooding
Parker County165,168$448k$1,6184.3%inland flooding
Rockwall County123,617$416k$1,9625.7%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Asking rent may not hold through vacancy, concessions, or operating costs, leaving the gross yield unable to support the purchase.
  2. Inland-flood exposure, insurance terms, or parcel conditions could make carrying costs or insurability worse than the county model indicates.
  3. Listing-market softness and absent closed-sale and property-level demand evidence could impair valuation or exit assumptions.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent market rent or HUD FMR?

It is median asking rent; HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a separate payment standard.

What does FHFA measure?

A repeat-transaction HPI, not a home value; its annual observation is separate from Zillow’s county observation.

What does QCEW employment measure?

Annual average covered jobs located at county workplaces, not resident employment, unemployment, a forecast, or metro CES/LAUS.