Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 48367 · population 165,168 · part of Dallas, TX
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,618 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,427 | Parker County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,473 | Parker County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,723 | Parker County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $2,273 | Parker County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $2,815 | Parker County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 48367. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Parker County presents a yield-versus-price tension. Zillow's median home value is $448,307 in 2026-06, down 0.46% year over year, while median asking rent is $1,618 per month, up 2.23%. The gross yield is 4.33% before costs. This merits investigation by an investor who can verify expenses and flood exposure, but caution for one relying on appreciation or a wide cash-flow margin. FHFA's repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.30% in 2025 and was also positive over its five-year cumulative measure; it is a different vintage and method, not a home value or a rate to average with Zillow.
Price, rent, and taxes do not establish a comfortable net return. The effective property-tax rate is 1.40%; subtracting it from gross yield leaves a calculated 2.93 percentage points before insurance, repairs, vacancy, management, financing, and other costs. HUD's $1,723 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent, and cannot substitute for market rent. Missing closed-sale comps, condition, unit details, and operating expenses prevent property-level underwriting.
Demand and competition are mixed. Tax-return migration produced more arrivals than departures, while incoming average AGI exceeded outgoing average by a calculated $18,399; that supports screening but does not measure resident employment or renter depth. QCEW covers annual average workplace jobs and wages, both growing, and identifies Trade, transportation, and utilities as the largest disclosed private supersector; it is not unemployment or a metro series. Realtor.com shows tighter visible supply and shorter marketing time, but 26.84% of listings had price reductions, so listing measures do not prove closed demand. Investor share was 4.84% of 3,179 purchases: limited recorded mortgage competition, but cash buyers remain unobserved.
Risk limits are material because the dominant modeled hazard is inland flood. The climate loss ratio is 0.11% of building value expected lost per year, a modeled measure rather than an insurance quote, flood-zone determination, or property-specific loss history. The record omits insurance cost, deductibles, flood elevation, drainage, vacancy, concessions, financing, and verified rent and expense comps. Those gaps prevent a defensible net yield, debt-service result, or hazard-adjusted property conclusion. Next checks are parcel-level flood review, insurance indications, and a property-specific operating statement; county signals remain screening evidence.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.110% of building value expected lost per year
$5,249 median annual bill
7,257 in · 5,230 out
$94,147 arriving · $75,748 leaving
154 of 3,179 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker County | 165,168 | $448k | $1,618 | 4.3% | inland flooding |
| Dallas County | 2,621,179 | $312k | $1,646 | 6.3% | inland flooding |
| Tarrant County | 2,167,390 | $326k | $1,639 | 6.0% | inland flooding |
| Collin County | 1,163,337 | $487k | $1,736 | 4.3% | inland flooding |
| Denton County | 979,561 | $444k | $1,706 | 4.6% | inland flooding |
| Ellis County | 213,160 | $376k | $1,827 | 5.8% | inland flooding |
| Johnson County | 195,597 | $344k | $1,573 | 5.5% | inland flooding |
| Kaufman County | 172,604 | $300k | $1,856 | 7.4% | inland flooding |
| Rockwall County | 123,617 | $416k | $1,962 | 5.7% | inland flooding |
It uses the published median asking rent; the HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market rent.
It provides repeat-transaction HPI appreciation evidence from a different vintage and method; it is not a home value.
Inland flood is the dominant modeled hazard, but property-specific flood, drainage, insurance, and loss-history details are not supplied.