Counties / Texas / Parker County

Parker County, TX

FIPS 48367 · population 165,168 · part of Dallas, TX

$448k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$448k
▼ 0.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,618
▲ 2.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.3%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,723
market rent is 0.94x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+51.0%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.5%FHFA HPI2025+0.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$376k
Surveyed gross rent$1,500
Rent burden 30%+53.1%
Median year built2002
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
5.8%vacant
59,879estimated housing units
Occupied tenure19.3% renter
owner 80.7%renter 19.3%
Structure mix77.7% single-family
Single-family 77.7%20+ units 2.6%Mobile home 12.8%Other 6.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs42,853▲ 3.2% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments3,843annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,138▲ 4.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities25.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+3.2%WEEKLY WAGE+4.1%Trade, transportation, and utilities25.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Parker County presents a yield-versus-price tension. Zillow's median home value is $448,307 in 2026-06, down 0.46% year over year, while median asking rent is $1,618 per month, up 2.23%. The gross yield is 4.33% before costs. This merits investigation by an investor who can verify expenses and flood exposure, but caution for one relying on appreciation or a wide cash-flow margin. FHFA's repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.30% in 2025 and was also positive over its five-year cumulative measure; it is a different vintage and method, not a home value or a rate to average with Zillow.

02Housing economics

Price, rent, and taxes do not establish a comfortable net return. The effective property-tax rate is 1.40%; subtracting it from gross yield leaves a calculated 2.93 percentage points before insurance, repairs, vacancy, management, financing, and other costs. HUD's $1,723 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent, and cannot substitute for market rent. Missing closed-sale comps, condition, unit details, and operating expenses prevent property-level underwriting.

03Demand & competition

Demand and competition are mixed. Tax-return migration produced more arrivals than departures, while incoming average AGI exceeded outgoing average by a calculated $18,399; that supports screening but does not measure resident employment or renter depth. QCEW covers annual average workplace jobs and wages, both growing, and identifies Trade, transportation, and utilities as the largest disclosed private supersector; it is not unemployment or a metro series. Realtor.com shows tighter visible supply and shorter marketing time, but 26.84% of listings had price reductions, so listing measures do not prove closed demand. Investor share was 4.84% of 3,179 purchases: limited recorded mortgage competition, but cash buyers remain unobserved.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material because the dominant modeled hazard is inland flood. The climate loss ratio is 0.11% of building value expected lost per year, a modeled measure rather than an insurance quote, flood-zone determination, or property-specific loss history. The record omits insurance cost, deductibles, flood elevation, drainage, vacancy, concessions, financing, and verified rent and expense comps. Those gaps prevent a defensible net yield, debt-service result, or hazard-adjusted property conclusion. Next checks are parcel-level flood review, insurance indications, and a property-specific operating statement; county signals remain screening evidence.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Parker County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Fort Worth city*963.2KWeatherford city35.8KMineral Wells city*15.2KAzle city*14.1KBriar CDP*7.2KWillow Park city5.9KAledo city5.8KSpringtown city*3.9K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

23 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Fort Worth cityIncorporated place · spans 5 counties
    963,194
  2. 02
    Weatherford cityIncorporated place
    35,788
  3. 03
    Mineral Wells cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    15,244
  4. 04
    Azle cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    14,126
  5. 05
    Briar CDPCensus-designated place · spans 3 counties
    7,228
  6. 06
    Willow Park cityIncorporated place
    5,874
  7. 07
    Aledo cityIncorporated place
    5,825
  8. 08
    Springtown cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    3,855
  9. 09
    Reno city (Parker and Tarrant Counties)Census place · spans 2 counties
    3,272
  10. 10
    Annetta townIncorporated place
    3,264
  11. 11
    Hudson Oaks cityIncorporated place
    2,586
  12. 12
    Carter CDPCensus-designated place
    1,738
Show 11 more places
  1. 13
    Dennis townIncorporated place
    1,402
  2. 14
    Cresson cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    1,313
  3. 15
    Western Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    1,165
  4. 16
    Annetta South townIncorporated place
    763
  5. 17
    Horseshoe Bend CDPCensus-designated place
    606
  6. 18
    Peaster townIncorporated place
    515
  7. 19
    Garner CDPCensus-designated place
    493
  8. 20
    Millsap townIncorporated place
    433
  9. 21
    Annetta North townIncorporated place
    389
  10. 22
    Sanctuary townIncorporated place
    304
  11. 23
    Cool cityIncorporated place
    159

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.110% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.40%

$5,249 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+2,027

7,257 in · 5,230 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$18,399

$94,147 arriving · $75,748 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.8%

154 of 3,179 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,231▼ 9.5% year over year
Median days on market57▼ 0.9% year over year
Listings price-reduced26.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 1.4% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Dallas, TX

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Parker County165,168$448k$1,6184.3%inland flooding
Dallas County2,621,179$312k$1,6466.3%inland flooding
Tarrant County2,167,390$326k$1,6396.0%inland flooding
Collin County1,163,337$487k$1,7364.3%inland flooding
Denton County979,561$444k$1,7064.6%inland flooding
Ellis County213,160$376k$1,8275.8%inland flooding
Johnson County195,597$344k$1,5735.5%inland flooding
Kaufman County172,604$300k$1,8567.4%inland flooding
Rockwall County123,617$416k$1,9625.7%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual achievable rent or occupancy may be below the county asking-rent measure, weakening the gross yield.
  2. Parcel-level inland-flood conditions, insurance, or deductibles may exceed the modeled county loss signal.
  3. Visible listing and migration signals may not translate into closed demand, and cash-buyer competition is not observed.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

What rent measure supports the gross-yield figure?

It uses the published median asking rent; the HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market rent.

What does FHFA add to the price assessment?

It provides repeat-transaction HPI appreciation evidence from a different vintage and method; it is not a home value.

What is the main property-level hazard check?

Inland flood is the dominant modeled hazard, but property-specific flood, drainage, insurance, and loss-history details are not supplied.