Counties / Texas / Tarrant County

Tarrant County, TX

FIPS 48439 · population 2,167,390 · part of Dallas, TX

$326k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$326k
▼ 1.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,639
▲ 0.5% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.0%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,723
market rent is 0.95x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+45.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−1.6%FHFA HPI2025+0.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$324k
Surveyed gross rent$1,547
Rent burden 30%+55.5%
Median year built1990
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
7.2%vacant
843,257estimated housing units
Occupied tenure40.7% renter
owner 59.3%renter 40.7%
Structure mix69.3% single-family
Single-family 69.3%20+ units 10.5%Mobile home 1.8%Other 18.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,016,221▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments49,966annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,440▲ 3.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities27.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+3.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities27.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Tarrant County’s tension is income against carrying-cost and resale uncertainty. Landlords should investigate property expenses and rent comps; buyers relying on resale or untested rent growth should be cautious. Zillow’s 2026-06 county median value was $326,127 and median asking rent $1,639 monthly, producing the supplied 6.03% gross yield before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market asking rent or a yield input.

02Housing economics

Carrying costs are central: the effective property-tax rate is 1.65%, before insurance, repairs, vacancy and financing costs, which are not published. Zillow’s county value fell 1.56% year over year in its June observation, whereas FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.46%. These results are differently dated and measured; FHFA is not a home value, and the two rates cannot be combined.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com MLS evidence shows active listings fell year over year, but marketing took a median 47 days and 25.78% of listings had price reductions. These are visible supply, marketing-time and seller-concession measures, not closed-sale prices or buyer demand alone. Tax-return household migration was net positive by 2,120, while inbound movers’ average AGI was $3,304 below outbound movers’; that mix does not establish stronger purchasing capacity. Investor purchase mortgages were 2,166 of 23,374 purchases, or 9.27%; this signals competition but not buyer type, location or hold period.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is dominant; modeled expected annual climate loss equals 0.13% of building value, not a parcel-specific flood determination. QCEW annual covered workplace jobs and wages rose, but do not measure resident employment or forecast demand; trade, transportation and utilities is only the largest disclosed private supersector. Missing neighborhood closed-sale comps, unit-specific rent history, insurance and flood-zone/mitigation data, operating expenses, financing terms and property condition prevent a net-yield, resale-liquidity or property-level hazard conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Tarrant County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Fort Worth city*963.2KArlington city397.7KGrand Prairie city*201.9KFlower Mound town*78.4KMansfield city*77.5KNorth Richland Hills city70.8KEuless city60.4KBurleson city*52.9K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

45 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Fort Worth cityIncorporated place · spans 5 counties
    963,194
  2. 02
    Arlington cityIncorporated place
    397,742
  3. 03
    Grand Prairie cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    201,883
  4. 04
    Flower Mound townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    78,389
  5. 05
    Mansfield cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    77,510
  6. 06
    North Richland Hills cityIncorporated place
    70,780
  7. 07
    Euless cityIncorporated place
    60,421
  8. 08
    Burleson cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    52,918
  9. 09
    Grapevine cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    51,139
  10. 10
    Bedford cityIncorporated place
    49,085
  11. 11
    Keller cityIncorporated place
    45,976
  12. 12
    Haltom City cityIncorporated place
    45,767
Show 33 more places
  1. 13
    Hurst cityIncorporated place
    39,861
  2. 14
    Southlake cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    31,137
  3. 15
    Colleyville cityIncorporated place
    26,012
  4. 16
    Saginaw cityIncorporated place
    24,970
  5. 17
    Benbrook cityIncorporated place
    24,557
  6. 18
    Watauga cityIncorporated place
    23,233
  7. 19
    Crowley cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    19,532
  8. 20
    White Settlement cityIncorporated place
    18,150
  9. 21
    Rendon CDPCensus-designated place
    14,632
  10. 22
    Azle cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    14,126
  11. 23
    Forest Hill cityIncorporated place
    14,062
  12. 24
    Trophy Club townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    13,733
  13. 25
    Roanoke cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    10,286
  14. 26
    Kennedale cityIncorporated place
    9,439
  15. 27
    Richland Hills cityIncorporated place
    8,493
  16. 28
    River Oaks cityIncorporated place
    7,584
  17. 29
    Briar CDPCensus-designated place · spans 3 counties
    7,228
  18. 30
    Everman cityIncorporated place
    6,106
  19. 31
    Sansom Park cityIncorporated place
    5,392
  20. 32
    Lake Worth cityIncorporated place
    4,829
  21. 33
    Pecan Acres CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    4,161
  22. 34
    Edgecliff Village townIncorporated place
    3,766
  23. 35
    Haslet cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    3,280
  24. 36
    Reno city (Parker and Tarrant Counties)Census place · spans 2 counties
    3,272
  25. 37
    Westworth Village cityIncorporated place
    2,643
  26. 38
    Pelican Bay cityIncorporated place
    2,399
  27. 39
    Blue Mound cityIncorporated place
    2,366
  28. 40
    Pantego townIncorporated place
    2,337
  29. 41
    Dalworthington Gardens cityIncorporated place
    2,180
  30. 42
    Westlake townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,670
  31. 43
    Lakeside town (Tarrant County)Census place
    1,401
  32. 44
    Newark cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,177
  33. 45
    Westover Hills townIncorporated place
    908

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.129% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.65%

$5,334 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+2,120

60,863 in · 58,743 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$3,304

$70,316 arriving · $73,620 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.3%

2,166 of 23,374 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings5,753▼ 8.6% year over year
Median days on market47▲ 2.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced25.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 0.5% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Dallas, TX

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Tarrant County2,167,390$326k$1,6396.0%inland flooding
Dallas County2,621,179$312k$1,6466.3%inland flooding
Collin County1,163,337$487k$1,7364.3%inland flooding
Denton County979,561$444k$1,7064.6%inland flooding
Ellis County213,160$376k$1,8275.8%inland flooding
Johnson County195,597$344k$1,5735.5%inland flooding
Kaufman County172,604$300k$1,8567.4%inland flooding
Parker County165,168$448k$1,6184.3%inland flooding
Rockwall County123,617$416k$1,9625.7%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Subject-unit rents, taxes and operating costs may differ materially from county medians, weakening gross-yield screening.
  2. Flood exposure and insurance costs are parcel-specific, while the county climate model cannot establish a property’s cost.
  3. MLS listing conditions and migration aggregates may not translate into closed-sale liquidity or tenant depth.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Does the record provide market rent rather than only a HUD payment standard?

Yes. It reports a separate median asking rent; HUD FMR remains a payment standard and should not replace market rent in yield analysis.

Do the Realtor.com measures prove closed-sale demand?

No. They describe MLS listing supply, marketing time and seller price reductions, not completed-sale pricing or buyer demand by themselves.

What does the QCEW series measure?

It measures annual covered employment at workplaces in the county and average weekly wages for covered workers; it is not resident employment or a demand forecast.