ZIP reports / TX / 75033
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 75033, Frisco, TX

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 75033?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 75033 is $1,818 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,8182026-06 · down 1.2% year over year
ACS median gross rent$2,056ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$140 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,550Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 75033
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,490ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,090HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,554ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,180HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,818ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,550HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,289ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,210HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,909ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,080HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$174,762ACS 2024 5-year · ±$14,304 MOE
Renter share30.4%5,139 renter households
Rent burden 30%+44.0%2,262 observed households
Housing vacancy4.4%782 of 17,706 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 75033Zillow asking-rent index$1,818ACS median gross rent$2,056HUD two-bedroom standard$2,550

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 75033ACS median household income$174,762Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$72,720

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 75033Studio$1,490One bedroom$1,554Two bedrooms$1,818Three bedrooms$2,289Four bedrooms$2,909

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 7503330% or more of income2,262 householdsBelow 30%2,877 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 75033ZIP 75033$1,818Frisco city$1,861Denton County county$1,706Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro$1,673

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 75033; missing months remain gaps$2,005$1,874$1,744$1,6142021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
9.3%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
7.1%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.3%135 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%136 of 136 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 75033

ZIP 75033 presents a measured affordability-versus-momentum tension: its June 2026 Zillow ZORI was $1,818 per month, while the current asking-rent index was down 1.2% from a year earlier despite a matched-area median household income of $174,762. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a lease-level average for a defined bedroom count. Annualizing that index produces a $72,720 income screen at 30% of income. That screen is arithmetic only; it is neither advice nor an applicant qualification rule, and it does not establish what any household actually pays.

The rent path supplies the clearest caution about treating the current figure as durable. The one-year same-month annualized change was -1.2%, and the three-year annualized change was -1.9%, so recent direction confirms a cooling path over both horizons. The five-year annualized change remained positive at 1.8%, however, meaning the latest multi-year softness breaks from, rather than erases, the longer cumulative expansion. Monthly ZORI returns produce 3.3% annualized variability, which supports moderate confidence in the broad direction but less confidence in a single rent snapshot. Separately, the maximum peak-to-trough drawdown reached 7.1%, showing that prior declines have been materially larger than the latest annual change. History coverage was 100% with 136 observations and 135 consecutive returns. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 2,728 for momentum, 2,035 for stability, and 2,754 for the balanced measure; these are backward-looking discovery tools, not forecasts or investment signals.

Bedroom figures should be read as a local scaling exercise rather than as observed unit rents. Modelled monthly ZIP estimates are $1,490 for a studio, $1,554 for one bedroom, $1,818 for two bedrooms, $2,289 for three bedrooms, and $2,909 for four bedrooms. They scale the ZIP Zillow ZORI through the local HUD bedroom ladder and are never measured bedroom rents. The local HUD two-bedroom standard is $2,550, placing the modelled two-bedroom estimate at 71.3% of that benchmark. HUD FMR or SAFMR values are administrative, bedroom-specific standards; they are not asking-rent observations and should not be substituted for current advertised rents.

The ACS comparison points to a different housing universe. The 75033 label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the ACS 2024 five-year survey, median gross rent was $2,056 with a $140 margin of error. That survey covers occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, unlike Zillow’s asking-rent index. ACS also estimated 2,262 of 5,139 renter households, or 44.0%, as spending at least 30% of income on gross rent. This burden measure describes surveyed households in aggregate; it cannot prove burden, utility treatment, or affordability for a particular available unit.

Housing stock adds context to that burden statistic without establishing property-level availability. The matched ZCTA had 17,706 housing units, including 13,995 single-family units and 3,120 units in large multifamily structures. Renters represented 30.4% of occupied homes, so the area’s occupied stock was predominantly owner occupied. The overall vacancy rate was 4.4%, and 244 units were categorized as vacant for rent in the ACS survey. Those are survey-based area counts, not a live listing count, and neither metric demonstrates that a specific building, bedroom type, lease term, or price point is vacant.

Wider comparisons show that the ZIP sits above the broader rent contexts, though those places are not substitutes for ZIP evidence: Frisco city context rent was $1,861, Denton County context rent was $1,706, and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro context rent was $1,673. The ZIP’s $1,818 index was therefore slightly below the named city context but above both the county context and the metro context. City, county, and metro values are useful benchmarks with their respective geographic scopes, not proof that conditions, available units, or renter composition match ZIP 75033.

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation creates a second cooling signal, but it belongs wholly to the for-sale market. The median sold price was $703,965, down 4.0% year over year, with 198 homes sold and a median 37 days on market. There were 547 active listings, inventory was lower than a year earlier, and months of supply stood at 4.7. The average sale-to-list result was 97.4%, while 13.0% of homes sold above list, indicating transactions often closed below list even though some sales exceeded it. This is direct ZIP resale evidence, not rental transactions or rental comparables. Dividing annualized ZIP ZORI by the median sold price yields a 3.1% cross-source screening ratio only. The steeper sold-price decline than the one-year rent decline confirms broad cooling across two markets, while the rental history’s positive five-year result prevents treating the resale snapshot as a complete account of rent conditions.

Several limits remain material. Zillow’s blended asking-rent index cannot identify the rent, concessions, included utilities, condition, or availability of a particular home; ACS is a five-year survey rather than a current listing feed; HUD is an administrative standard; and Redfin measures resale rather than rental activity. A property-level review would need to verify the actual bedroom count, current advertised rent, utility responsibilities, concessions, lease duration, listing status, and the comparable sale records behind any resale comparison. The measured evidence describes a cooling recent rent path alongside a declining resale median, but what current unit-level terms would remain after those checks?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Recent rent direction is weaker than the five-year record

The ZIP’s one-year and three-year same-month rent measures were negative, while the five-year annualized measure remained positive. That split matters because it shows current cooling is real in the observed history without establishing that the entire longer rent path has reversed. Variability and prior drawdown also reduce confidence in any single current index reading.

Bedroom rents are modelled from the HUD ladder

Studio-through-four-bedroom figures are estimates created by scaling ZIP Zillow ZORI with the local HUD ladder. They provide a consistent bedroom pattern for screening, but they are not measured asking rents for available units. HUD FMR or SAFMR is an administrative standard, so its relationship to ZORI should not be interpreted as a market rent comparison for a specific property.

Affordability measures describe different populations and costs

The required-income screen uses current Zillow asking rent and a 30% arithmetic threshold. ACS burden data instead summarize occupied renter households and gross rent, including selected utilities, across a five-year survey. The ZIP’s high median household income and the reported renter burden can coexist because neither figure identifies the income, utility treatment, or rent paid by an individual renter.

Resale cooling supports, but does not define, the rental screen

Redfin’s direct ZIP resale data show a lower median sold price year over year, marketing time, active listings, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes. Those signals confirm a for-sale market cooling tension alongside softer recent asking-rent history. They do not convert resale activity into rental evidence, and the annualized-rent-to-price figure remains only a cross-source screening ratio.

  • The Zillow ZORI figure is a blended asking-rent index across rental types, so it may not match a particular bedroom count, property condition, concession package, lease term, utility arrangement, or currently available listing.
  • ACS ZCTA estimates are five-year survey measures for a statistical area rather than a live ZIP delivery area or current listing market, and their margins of error add uncertainty to point comparisons.
  • HUD FMR or SAFMR values are administrative bedroom-specific standards rather than observed asking rents, while the bedroom estimates derived from them are modelled outputs and should not be treated as measured rents.
  • Redfin resale observations concern homes sold in the direct ZIP for-sale market, not rental transactions; price movements, supply, and sale-to-list results cannot establish rental performance for any particular property.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 75033

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$703,965-4.0% year over year
Homes sold198rolling three-month observation
Median days on market37 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply4.7resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 75033Active listings547Inventory305Pending sales192Homes sold198

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

305 observed inventory · -2.1% year over year.

Price realization

97.4% average sale-to-list ratio · 13.0% sold above original list.

Early absorption

34.3% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 37 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Denton County listing conditions

4,685 active Realtor.com listings · 47 median days on market · 28.5% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

9.0% reported apartment vacancy · 35 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 75033. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

How should the current Zillow rent figure be interpreted?

It is a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. It is useful for tracking broad asking-rent direction, but it does not identify a specific unit’s bedroom count, utilities, concessions, lease terms, availability, or executed lease rent. The recent negative history also warrants caution around a single monthly snapshot.

Why does ACS gross rent differ from Zillow ZORI?

The measures use different universes. Zillow ZORI tracks observed asking rents, whereas ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. ACS is also reported for the matched Census ZCTA, which is a statistical area and not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP.

What does the Redfin screening ratio mean?

It divides annualized ZIP Zillow ZORI by Redfin’s median sold price in the direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation. It is a cross-source screening ratio that places asking-rent scale beside resale-price scale. It is not a cap rate, property yield, net return, expected return, or a substitute for property-level income and expense records.

What property-level facts remain necessary before applying this ZIP evidence?

The available evidence cannot replace verification of the actual advertised rent, bedroom count, utility obligations, concessions, lease duration, listing status, property condition, and relevant comparable records. Those checks matter because each source here measures an area-level index, survey, administrative standard, or resale observation rather than the terms of one identifiable home.