ZIP reports / TX / 75034
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 75034, Frisco, TX

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 75034?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 75034 is $1,704 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,7042026-06 · down 0.9% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,864ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$55 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,540Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 75034
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,395ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,080HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,456ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,170HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,704ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,540HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,147ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,200HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,730ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,070HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$111,122ACS 2024 5-year · ±$8,862 MOE
Renter share61.4%14,231 renter households
Rent burden 30%+44.1%6,276 observed households
Housing vacancy6.3%1,566 of 24,756 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 75034Zillow asking-rent index$1,704ACS median gross rent$1,864HUD two-bedroom standard$2,540

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 75034ACS median household income$111,122Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$68,160

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 75034Studio$1,395One bedroom$1,456Two bedrooms$1,704Three bedrooms$2,147Four bedrooms$2,730

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 7503430% or more of income6,276 householdsBelow 30%7,955 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 75034ZIP 75034$1,704Frisco city$1,861Collin County county$1,736Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro$1,673

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 75034; missing months remain gaps$1,889$1,770$1,650$1,5312021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
8.0%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
7.8%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.7%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 75034

ZIP 75034 presents a cross-market tension rather than a single directional signal. Zillow’s June 2026 ZIP ZORI is $1,704 per month, down 0.8% from the same month a year earlier. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, so it describes current advertised-rent conditions rather than an individual lease, a specific property’s economics, or a measured rent for a particular bedroom count. The immediate asking-rent reading is therefore softer than a year ago, while other evidence in this packet requires that cooling signal to be assessed separately from resale pricing and household-level survey measures.

Source scope materially changes the comparison. For wider context, Frisco city context rent is $1,861, Collin County context rent is $1,736, and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro context rent is $1,673; each is a broader geographic reference rather than a substitute for the ZIP reading. The matched Census ZCTA’s ACS 2024 five-year median gross rent is $1,864. That ACS figure is a survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, whereas ZORI is an asking-rent index; the lower current asking index should not be treated as a contradiction or as proof that comparable new leases are below every occupied household’s gross-rent payment. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP.

The bedroom ladder translates the ZIP-level ZORI into modelled estimates, not measured bedroom rents. Scaling the current index by the local HUD ladder produces estimated monthly amounts of $1,395 for a studio, $1,456 for a one-bedroom, $1,704 for a two-bedroom, $2,147 for a three-bedroom, and $2,730 for a four-bedroom. The local HUD two-bedroom standard is $2,540, but HUD FMR or SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. These figures are useful for maintaining a consistent size relationship around the ZIP asking-rent index, yet they do not establish the advertised price, utility treatment, quality, concessions, or availability of any actual unit.

The 30% required-income screen converts the asking-rent index into a simple annual income comparison: the result is $68,160. That is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. The matched ZCTA’s median household income is $111,122, placing the annualized asking-rent screen at 18.4% of that benchmark income. At the same time, 44.1% of ACS renter households report gross-rent burdens at or above 30% of income. The contrast shows why a ZIP-wide median-income comparison cannot stand in for renter-level affordability: the burden measure reflects occupied renter homes, income variation, and gross rent with selected utilities, not a prediction about any one applicant or unit.

The ACS housing profile also places the rent evidence in a renter-heavy stock mix. Reported structure counts include 10,531 single-family units and 11,467 units in larger multifamily buildings, while renter-occupied homes account for 61.4% of occupied homes. The ZCTA vacancy rate is 6.3%, and those vacant homes have multiple possible statuses rather than representing a verified supply of currently leaseable units. This composition is relevant because a blended asking-rent index can reflect different rental types, while the ACS gross-rent and burden measures describe occupied renter homes across the same statistical area. Neither the vacancy measure nor the stock mix proves availability, pricing, or condition for a particular residence.

The longer ZORI record confirms cooling over the nearer path but preserves an older positive period. Exact same-month change is negative over one year at 0.8% and over three years at 1.8%, while the five-year annualized change remains positive at 1.6%. Thus, the latest decline extends the intermediate cooling pattern but breaks from the older gain rather than erasing it. Complete history coverage supports observation of the series, although its 2.7% annualized monthly-return variability means a single current index value deserves more confidence as a broad ZIP snapshot than as a precise unit-level benchmark. Separately, the worst peak-to-trough decline was 7.8%, demonstrating that the historical path included a meaningful retreat. Transparent national discovery ranks place momentum at 2,677, stability at 1,054, and the balanced measure at 2,380 among history-eligible ZIPs, where lower ranks are higher. These are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

Resale evidence moves differently from asking rent and remains entirely in the for-sale universe. The direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation reports a median sold price of $834,811, up 1.2% year over year, with 140 homes sold and a median 42 days on market. Inventory was 226 homes and months of supply measured 4.9; average sale-to-list was 97.4%, while 9.6% of sales closed above list. Those data describe resale liquidity, marketing time, inventory, and negotiation signals—not rental transactions or rental comparables. The contrast between a modestly rising median sold price and cooling ZIP asking rent challenges any single-market interpretation. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the median sold price is 2.45%, but that is only a cross-source screening ratio, not a cap rate, net return, expected return, property yield, or evidence about an individual home.

The packet supports a disciplined comparison, but not property-specific conclusions. Zillow’s current ZIP asking-rent index, ACS occupied-home survey results, HUD’s administrative standards, and Redfin’s ZIP resale observations have different populations, timing, and purposes. A property-level assessment would require confirmation of the advertised rent and lease term, bedroom count, utility responsibility, concessions, unit condition, availability date, and whether the home is comparable to the listing or sale being evaluated. It would also need direct unit-level rental and sale evidence rather than assuming that the ZORI, modelled ladder, vacancy rate, burden share, or resale median applies to one address. The central unresolved tension is whether a specific unit’s current asking terms align with cooling ZIP rent history despite firmer recent resale pricing.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current asking rent is cooling, but the source comparison is not like-for-like

The ZIP’s Zillow asking-rent index has declined from the same month a year earlier, while the matched ACS ZCTA median gross rent is higher. This is not a direct conflict: ZORI tracks typical observed asking rents across rental types, while ACS measures occupied renter homes over a five-year survey period and includes selected utilities. The comparison is informative only when those universes remain separate.

Bedroom figures are modelled from the HUD ladder

The studio-through-four-bedroom estimates preserve the ZIP ZORI as the central asking-rent signal and apply the local HUD bedroom relationship to it. They are modelled estimates rather than observed bedroom rents. HUD’s role is administrative and size-specific, not a record of current asking rents, lease terms, concessions, utility charges, availability, or unit condition.

Nearer rent history is weaker than the older path

Same-month ZORI changes show declines over the one-year and three-year horizons, while the five-year annualized measure remains positive. That pattern identifies recent cooling without converting the historical record into a forecast. Monthly variability and the prior peak-to-trough decline also mean that a current ZIP index is stronger as a broad market reference than as a precise estimate for a single unit.

Resale pricing and asking rents point in different directions

The direct ZIP resale observation shows a higher median sold price than a year earlier, even as the current asking-rent index is lower. Sales volume, marketing time, supply, and sale-to-list data describe for-sale liquidity and negotiation conditions only. The annualized-rent-to-sale-price calculation is a cross-source screen; it does not incorporate property costs or establish a return measure.

  • Zillow asking-rent index, ACS occupied-renter survey results, HUD administrative standards, and Redfin resale observations have different definitions, time frames, and populations, so combining them as interchangeable rent or value measures would distort the evidence.
  • The bedroom ladder is mechanically modelled from ZIP ZORI and local HUD relationships. Actual rents can differ because the packet does not identify unit features, utilities, concessions, lease length, condition, availability, or property-specific rental competition.
  • Complete historical coverage improves confidence that the recorded ZORI path is observed consistently, but past rent changes, monthly variability, drawdown, and discovery ranks remain backward-looking measurements rather than evidence of future asking-rent direction.
  • Vacancy, renter burden, and housing-stock counts are area-level ACS measures. They cannot prove that a particular unit is vacant, affordable to a particular household, available for lease, or representative of current advertised inventory.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 75034

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$834,811+1.2% year over year
Homes sold140rolling three-month observation
Median days on market42 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply4.9resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 75034Active listings434Inventory226Pending sales152Homes sold140

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

226 observed inventory · +7.5% year over year.

Price realization

97.4% average sale-to-list ratio · 9.6% sold above original list.

Early absorption

32.3% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 42 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Collin County listing conditions

5,300 active Realtor.com listings · 50 median days on market · 29.3% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

9.0% reported apartment vacancy · 35 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 75034. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why do the ZIP asking-rent index and ACS median gross rent differ?

They cover different evidence universes. Zillow ZORI is a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure of occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The ACS geography is a matched Census ZCTA, which is a statistical area rather than an identical USPS delivery ZIP.

Are the studio through four-bedroom figures observed market rents?

No. They are modelled monthly estimates created by scaling the ZIP ZORI using the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD FMR or SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent. The results preserve a local size relationship but do not measure actual advertised rents for specific units, buildings, leases, or utility packages.

Does the required-income screen determine whether a household can qualify?

No. The screen annualizes the ZIP asking-rent index and applies a 30% income share as arithmetic. It is not advice, underwriting, or an applicant qualification rule. Median household income and ACS renter burden describe area-level distributions and survey outcomes, neither of which determines an individual household’s income, expenses, lease terms, or eligibility.

What does the annualized rent-to-sale-price ratio tell a reader?

It is only a cross-source screening ratio formed by dividing annualized ZIP ZORI by the direct ZIP median sold price. It can highlight the tension between asking-rent and resale evidence, but it is not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. The packet does not provide property-specific operating, financing, lease, or transaction-cost inputs.