Counties / Texas / Bexar County

Bexar County, TX

FIPS 48029 · population 2,067,341 · part of San Antonio, TX

$257k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Bexar County, TX?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,389 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,3892026-06 · down 2.0% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,354ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,426FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Bexar County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,077Bexar County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,177Bexar County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,426Bexar County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,830Bexar County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,132Bexar County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$257k
▼ 2.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,389
▼ 2.0% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.5%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,426
market rent is 0.97x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+36.7%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−2.1%FHFA HPI2025+0.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$262k
Surveyed gross rent$1,354
Rent burden 30%+53.4%
Median year built1990
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.5%vacant
820,780estimated housing units
Occupied tenure41.1% renter
owner 58.9%renter 41.1%
Structure mix66.5% single-family
Single-family 66.5%20+ units 11.2%Mobile home 2.6%Other 19.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs936,597▲ 0.5% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments45,109annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,305▲ 3.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities20.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.5%WEEKLY WAGE+3.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities20.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Bexar CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$35k$70k196919972024$4k$61k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Bexar CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI62,50575.6% burdened30–50% HAMFI50,05586.8% burdened50–80% HAMFI65,27556.7% burdened80–100% HAMFI33,55523.3% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI90,4206.2% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Bexar County, TX

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 48029. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,313$1,226$1,1382021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,1392026-07 · -5.1% year over year
Rental vacancy8.9%2026-07 · -0.2 percentage points year over year
Time on market36 days2026-07 · +0.3 days year over year
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Bexar County presents a valuation-versus-income tension: Zillow’s county reading for 2026-06 puts median home value at $257,364, down 2.11%, and median asking rent at $1,389 per month, down 2.03%. This is a file for investors who can validate current lease and acquisition comparables rather than underwrite momentum. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.53%; it is an index, not a home value, and its different vintage and method neither confirms nor offsets Zillow’s snapshot.

02Housing economics

The reported 6.48% gross yield uses measured market rent before operating costs, so it is not cash flow. The supplied median annual tax bill is $4,535, and the 1.73% effective property-tax rate is a material carrying-cost input. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,426, a payment standard rather than asking rent. The market asking-rent measure equals 97.4% of that standard, which does not establish voucher rent, tenant mix, or a yield.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS listing market shows 9,069 active listings, 5.14% above the prior year, while 27.41% carried price reductions. These are visible asking supply and seller concessions, not closed sales or stand-alone proof of buyer demand. In the 2025 QCEW annual file, covered employment at county workplaces rose 0.45%; this is not resident employment. Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Net migration was positive, but movers in reported lower average AGI than movers out. Investor purchases were 7.6% of total purchases, limiting the case that non-owner buyers alone set pricing.

04Risk & next checks

The dominant hazard is inland flood, alongside modeled annual building-value loss of 0.15%; that ratio is not a parcel insurance quote or a dollar loss. Missing flood-zone status, elevation, insurance premium and deductible, property condition, financing terms, vacancy, repair costs, and property-level rent and sale comparables prevent a reliable net-income, resilience, or exit-price conclusion. Confirm tax assessment and appeals exposure as well, because county medians do not price an individual asset.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Bexar County, TX

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,094$1,550Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$456highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range43.8%58.4%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered131,265across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.78209$1,55078258$1,49678245$1,43178249$1,37978223$1,36178207$1,28278201$1,20278251$1,18078240$1,17778229$1,15778216$1,13278230$1,094
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.60.9%56.0%51.1%46.2%41.3%782407822978216782497825178209782457820778230782587822378201Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.78207+120.9%78223+108.9%78209+95.7%78201+93.9%78245+86.2%78258+82.2%78249+77.9%78229+76.6%78216+76.0%78240+74.0%78251+73.8%78230+71.5%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

In Bexar County’s selected direct-evidence set, Zillow’s ZORI—its typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,094 to $1,550, a $456 spread, with a $1,242 median. The countywide ZORI is $1,389, so the immediate decision is not to treat one selected-area figure as countywide pricing: it is to identify whether a search budget aligns with the lower, middle, or upper end of this observed index range, then test live listings. Comparable searches should hold bedroom count and lease structure constant before a price difference is treated as meaningful for the household’s actual requirements. Direction is mixed but mostly downward: annual ZORI changes span a -7.6% decline to a +4.3% gain, versus -2.0% countywide. These are changes in an asking-rent index, not a forecast or a measure of any particular unit’s rent.

Three rent measures answer different questions. Alongside the countywide ZORI above, the ACS five-year median gross-rent estimate is $1,354 and HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,426. ZORI tracks typical observed asking rents, ACS reports surveyed gross rent, and FMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard; they should be read together only as distinct reference points, never averaged or substituted. In 78207, the $1,282 ZORI is 120.9% of its $1,060 two-bedroom FMR, while its ACS median gross rent is $907. At the other end, the ZORI-to-two-bedroom-FMR comparison is 71.5%. These gaps identify differing measures, not comparable-rent ranks.

Across the selected ZCTAs, the ACS share of renters paying at least 30% of income toward rent ranges from 43.8% to 58.4%, while ACS vacancy ranges from 4.6% to 14.7%. The pattern does not produce a simple trade-off: 78229 pairs the highest vacancy, 14.7%, with a 54.0% burden share. 78258, by contrast, has the lowest burden share, 43.8%, and 6.4% vacancy. This frames an availability-versus-household-affordability screen, but vacancy is not a count of available listings and burden describes surveyed existing renter households, not affordability for a specified lease.

Coverage and geography constrain the read. The display includes 12 selected direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches from 53 eligible matches and covers 131,265 renter households; it is not a county inventory. ZIP assignment uses the county holding the largest HUD residential-address share, and the included shares are at least 99.25%, yet ZIPs can cross county lines. ACS ZCTAs supplying income, burden, and vacancy estimates are Census statistical approximations rather than exact USPS delivery-ZIP footprints. Before choosing a property, verify live asking rent, bedroom count, lease term, concessions, recurring fees, included utilities, availability date, and any income or program eligibility terms.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

53 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
78240$1,177$1,342$1,59052.1%12.1%$47k100.0%
78229$1,157$1,292$1,51054.0%14.7%$46k100.0%
78216$1,132$1,234$1,49057.3%11.7%$45k100.0%
78249$1,379$1,527$1,77046.8%5.4%$55k100.0%
78251$1,180$1,413$1,60050.5%5.2%$47k100.0%
78209$1,550$1,447$1,62045.4%11.7%$62k100.0%
78245$1,431$1,618$1,66048.9%4.6%$57k100.0%
78207$1,282$907$1,06054.8%11.1%$51k100.0%
78230$1,094$1,363$1,53050.0%10.0%$44k100.0%
78258$1,496$1,736$1,82043.8%6.4%$60k100.0%
78223$1,361$1,128$1,25058.4%9.8%$54k99.3%
78201$1,202$1,069$1,28053.9%11.1%$48k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

The ZIP-level ACS measures in this packet are reported for Census ZCTAs, which are statistical tabulation areas. Their outlines do not perfectly follow USPS delivery ZIP service areas, so the estimates should not be treated as exact ZIP-address counts.

The direct-evidence selection is limited to matched records assigned by their largest HUD residential-address county share. It omits other eligible ZIPs and can include cross-county geographies; HUD FMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not an asking-rent observation.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Bexar County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
San Antonio city*1.5MSchertz city*44.1KTimberwood Park CDP35.4KCibolo city*35.1KConverse city29.6KUniversal City city*20.2KLive Oak city16KSelma city*11.5K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

34 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    San Antonio cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    1,479,835
  2. 02
    Schertz cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    44,050
  3. 03
    Timberwood Park CDPCensus-designated place
    35,413
  4. 04
    Cibolo cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    35,109
  5. 05
    Converse cityIncorporated place
    29,607
  6. 06
    Universal City cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    20,189
  7. 07
    Live Oak cityIncorporated place
    15,984
  8. 08
    Selma cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    11,503
  9. 09
    Leon Valley cityIncorporated place
    11,446
  10. 10
    Fair Oaks Ranch cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    10,728
  11. 11
    Scenic Oaks CDPCensus-designated place
    10,569
  12. 12
    Helotes cityIncorporated place
    9,630
Show 22 more places
  1. 13
    Kirby cityIncorporated place
    8,117
  2. 14
    Alamo Heights cityIncorporated place
    7,492
  3. 15
    Lackland AFB CDPCensus-designated place
    6,785
  4. 16
    Windcrest cityIncorporated place
    5,820
  5. 17
    Sandy Oaks cityIncorporated place
    5,396
  6. 18
    Terrell Hills cityIncorporated place
    5,070
  7. 19
    Castle Hills cityIncorporated place
    3,943
  8. 20
    Cross Mountain CDPCensus-designated place
    3,752
  9. 21
    Shavano Park cityIncorporated place
    3,670
  10. 22
    Hollywood Park townIncorporated place
    3,143
  11. 23
    Balcones Heights cityIncorporated place
    2,715
  12. 24
    Lytle cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    2,492
  13. 25
    Elmendorf cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    2,389
  14. 26
    St. Hedwig townIncorporated place
    2,313
  15. 27
    Olmos Park cityIncorporated place
    2,115
  16. 28
    Somerset cityIncorporated place
    2,005
  17. 29
    Randolph AFB CDPCensus-designated place
    1,240
  18. 30
    China Grove townIncorporated place
    1,215
  19. 31
    Von Ormy cityIncorporated place
    1,142
  20. 32
    Hill Country Village cityIncorporated place
    815
  21. 33
    Grey Forest cityIncorporated place
    640
  22. 34
    Macdona CDPCensus-designated place
    349

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.146% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.73%

$4,535 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+2,684

45,234 in · 42,550 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$8,895

$63,135 arriving · $72,030 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.6%

1,915 of 25,185 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings9,069▲ 5.1% year over year
Median days on market57▼ 1.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced27.4%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.6% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in San Antonio, TX

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Bexar County2,067,341$257k$1,3896.5%inland flooding
Comal County183,826$436k$1,5344.2%inland flooding
Guadalupe County183,642$301k$1,7106.8%inland flooding
Medina County53,547$325k$1,5625.8%inland flooding
Wilson County52,781$408k$1,6644.9%inland flooding
Atascosa County51,008$249kn/an/ainland flooding
Kendall County48,567$593k$1,6183.3%inland flooding
Bandera County22,021$344kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. County-level medians may conceal materially weaker rent, tax, condition, or liquidity outcomes in the target neighborhood.
  2. Inland-flood exposure and asset-specific insurance costs could materially change carrying costs beyond the modeled county ratio.
  3. MLS asking-market measures may not translate into closed-sale pricing or leasing outcomes for a specific property.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is market rent published for the county?

Yes. The record publishes median asking market rent and a reported gross yield.

Does the HUD FMR represent market asking rent?

No. It is a HUD payment standard and is distinct from the published market asking-rent measure.

What designated hazard requires property-specific review?

Inland flood.