Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 48029 · population 2,067,341 · part of San Antonio, TX
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,389 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,077 | Bexar County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,177 | Bexar County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,426 | Bexar County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $1,830 | Bexar County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $2,132 | Bexar County, TX | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 48029. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Bexar County presents a valuation-versus-income tension: Zillow’s county reading for 2026-06 puts median home value at $257,364, down 2.11%, and median asking rent at $1,389 per month, down 2.03%. This is a file for investors who can validate current lease and acquisition comparables rather than underwrite momentum. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.53%; it is an index, not a home value, and its different vintage and method neither confirms nor offsets Zillow’s snapshot.
The reported 6.48% gross yield uses measured market rent before operating costs, so it is not cash flow. The supplied median annual tax bill is $4,535, and the 1.73% effective property-tax rate is a material carrying-cost input. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,426, a payment standard rather than asking rent. The market asking-rent measure equals 97.4% of that standard, which does not establish voucher rent, tenant mix, or a yield.
Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS listing market shows 9,069 active listings, 5.14% above the prior year, while 27.41% carried price reductions. These are visible asking supply and seller concessions, not closed sales or stand-alone proof of buyer demand. In the 2025 QCEW annual file, covered employment at county workplaces rose 0.45%; this is not resident employment. Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Net migration was positive, but movers in reported lower average AGI than movers out. Investor purchases were 7.6% of total purchases, limiting the case that non-owner buyers alone set pricing.
The dominant hazard is inland flood, alongside modeled annual building-value loss of 0.15%; that ratio is not a parcel insurance quote or a dollar loss. Missing flood-zone status, elevation, insurance premium and deductible, property condition, financing terms, vacancy, repair costs, and property-level rent and sale comparables prevent a reliable net-income, resilience, or exit-price conclusion. Confirm tax assessment and appeals exposure as well, because county medians do not price an individual asset.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
In Bexar County’s selected direct-evidence set, Zillow’s ZORI—its typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,094 to $1,550, a $456 spread, with a $1,242 median. The countywide ZORI is $1,389, so the immediate decision is not to treat one selected-area figure as countywide pricing: it is to identify whether a search budget aligns with the lower, middle, or upper end of this observed index range, then test live listings. Comparable searches should hold bedroom count and lease structure constant before a price difference is treated as meaningful for the household’s actual requirements. Direction is mixed but mostly downward: annual ZORI changes span a -7.6% decline to a +4.3% gain, versus -2.0% countywide. These are changes in an asking-rent index, not a forecast or a measure of any particular unit’s rent.
Three rent measures answer different questions. Alongside the countywide ZORI above, the ACS five-year median gross-rent estimate is $1,354 and HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,426. ZORI tracks typical observed asking rents, ACS reports surveyed gross rent, and FMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard; they should be read together only as distinct reference points, never averaged or substituted. In 78207, the $1,282 ZORI is 120.9% of its $1,060 two-bedroom FMR, while its ACS median gross rent is $907. At the other end, the ZORI-to-two-bedroom-FMR comparison is 71.5%. These gaps identify differing measures, not comparable-rent ranks.
Across the selected ZCTAs, the ACS share of renters paying at least 30% of income toward rent ranges from 43.8% to 58.4%, while ACS vacancy ranges from 4.6% to 14.7%. The pattern does not produce a simple trade-off: 78229 pairs the highest vacancy, 14.7%, with a 54.0% burden share. 78258, by contrast, has the lowest burden share, 43.8%, and 6.4% vacancy. This frames an availability-versus-household-affordability screen, but vacancy is not a count of available listings and burden describes surveyed existing renter households, not affordability for a specified lease.
Coverage and geography constrain the read. The display includes 12 selected direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches from 53 eligible matches and covers 131,265 renter households; it is not a county inventory. ZIP assignment uses the county holding the largest HUD residential-address share, and the included shares are at least 99.25%, yet ZIPs can cross county lines. ACS ZCTAs supplying income, burden, and vacancy estimates are Census statistical approximations rather than exact USPS delivery-ZIP footprints. Before choosing a property, verify live asking rent, bedroom count, lease term, concessions, recurring fees, included utilities, availability date, and any income or program eligibility terms.
53 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78240 | $1,177 | $1,342 | $1,590 | 52.1% | 12.1% | $47k | 100.0% |
| 78229 | $1,157 | $1,292 | $1,510 | 54.0% | 14.7% | $46k | 100.0% |
| 78216 | $1,132 | $1,234 | $1,490 | 57.3% | 11.7% | $45k | 100.0% |
| 78249 | $1,379 | $1,527 | $1,770 | 46.8% | 5.4% | $55k | 100.0% |
| 78251 | $1,180 | $1,413 | $1,600 | 50.5% | 5.2% | $47k | 100.0% |
| 78209 | $1,550 | $1,447 | $1,620 | 45.4% | 11.7% | $62k | 100.0% |
| 78245 | $1,431 | $1,618 | $1,660 | 48.9% | 4.6% | $57k | 100.0% |
| 78207 | $1,282 | $907 | $1,060 | 54.8% | 11.1% | $51k | 100.0% |
| 78230 | $1,094 | $1,363 | $1,530 | 50.0% | 10.0% | $44k | 100.0% |
| 78258 | $1,496 | $1,736 | $1,820 | 43.8% | 6.4% | $60k | 100.0% |
| 78223 | $1,361 | $1,128 | $1,250 | 58.4% | 9.8% | $54k | 99.3% |
| 78201 | $1,202 | $1,069 | $1,280 | 53.9% | 11.1% | $48k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 78254 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,880 | ▼ 0.5% | 38.7% | 77,893 |
| ZIP 78253 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,573 | ▼ 1.8% | 65.2% | 69,282 |
| ZIP 78212 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,565 | ▼ 0.2% | 46.2% | 27,437 |
| ZIP 78209 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,550 | ▼ 2.3% | 45.4% | 43,400 |
| ZIP 78258 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,496 | ▼ 0.7% | 43.8% | 52,448 |
| ZIP 78247 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,487 | ▼ 1.3% | 49.3% | 51,933 |
| ZIP 78250 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,476 | ▼ 1.0% | 50.8% | 57,323 |
| ZIP 78245 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,431 | ▼ 3.8% | 48.9% | 96,015 |
| ZIP 78218 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,386 | ▼ 6.7% | 54.5% | 39,428 |
| ZIP 78249 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,379 | ▼ 4.0% | 46.8% | 63,439 |
| ZIP 78257 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,353 | ▼ 1.1% | 37.3% | 10,992 |
| ZIP 78233 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,288 | ▼ 4.8% | 43.5% | 48,911 |
| ZIP 78232 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,226 | ▼ 6.8% | 44.4% | 36,636 |
| ZIP 78228 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,216 | ▲ 2.1% | 53.9% | 56,165 |
| ZIP 78251 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,180 | ▼ 1.7% | 50.5% | 59,435 |
| ZIP 78240 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,177 | ▼ 3.0% | 52.1% | 57,921 |
| ZIP 78229 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,157 | ▼ 2.2% | 54.0% | 35,664 |
| ZIP 78216 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,132 | ▼ 7.6% | 57.3% | 41,180 |
| ZIP 78217 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,101 | ▼ 0.1% | 51.6% | 34,055 |
| ZIP 78230 rental reportBexar County | San Antonio, TX | $1,094 | ▼ 3.1% | 50.0% | 41,387 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.146% of building value expected lost per year
$4,535 median annual bill
45,234 in · 42,550 out
$63,135 arriving · $72,030 leaving
1,915 of 25,185 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bexar County | 2,067,341 | $257k | $1,389 | 6.5% | inland flooding |
| Comal County | 183,826 | $436k | $1,534 | 4.2% | inland flooding |
| Guadalupe County | 183,642 | $301k | $1,710 | 6.8% | inland flooding |
| Medina County | 53,547 | $325k | $1,562 | 5.8% | inland flooding |
| Wilson County | 52,781 | $408k | $1,664 | 4.9% | inland flooding |
| Atascosa County | 51,008 | $249k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
| Kendall County | 48,567 | $593k | $1,618 | 3.3% | inland flooding |
| Bandera County | 22,021 | $344k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
Yes. The record publishes median asking market rent and a reported gross yield.
No. It is a HUD payment standard and is distinct from the published market asking-rent measure.
Inland flood.