Counties / Texas / Comal County

Comal County, TX

FIPS 48091 · population 183,826 · part of San Antonio, TX

$436k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$436k
▼ 1.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,534
▼ 1.8% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.2%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,426
market rent is 1.08x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+48.0%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−1.4%FHFA HPI2025+0.6%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$427k
Surveyed gross rent$1,603
Rent burden 30%+52.7%
Median year built2005
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.5%vacant
77,961estimated housing units
Occupied tenure23.4% renter
owner 76.6%renter 23.4%
Structure mix77.1% single-family
Single-family 77.1%20+ units 7.1%Mobile home 7.5%Other 8.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs77,302▲ 1.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments5,267annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,151▲ 3.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities27.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.1%WEEKLY WAGE+3.1%Trade, transportation, and utilities27.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Comal County presents a cautious income-versus-price screen, with a clear tension between a high entry price and modest gross income. Zillow’s 2026-06 observation puts median home value at $436,283 and median asking rent at $1,534 per month, producing a 4.22% gross yield before taxes, insurance, repairs, vacancy, management, or financing. The thesis is therefore cost-sensitive: buyers pursuing rental income should investigate property-level expenses, while buyers depending on rent growth or quick resale should be cautious.

02Housing economics

Market rent was 107.6% of HUD’s $1,426 two-bedroom FMR, but FMR is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent or achieved rent. The effective property-tax rate was 1.13%, and median annual tax was $4,833; those carrying costs make the gross yield materially different from a net return. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.6%. That is an appreciation index, not a home value, and its vintage and method should not be averaged with Zillow’s observation.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed rather than empty. Realtor.com MLS evidence shows median listing price down 7.51%, active listings up 3.45%, and price reductions on 26% of listings; these are asking-market measures, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. Net migration was 2,818, while inbound mover average AGI exceeded outbound by $18,649, a calculation from the supplied mover averages. Annual QCEW covered employment grew 1.14% and average covered-worker wage grew 3.14%; these are workplace jobs and covered-worker averages, not resident employment or unemployment. Investors represented 6.52% of 3,926 purchase mortgages, limiting the evidence for dominant investor competition.

04Risk & next checks

The main underwriting limit is missing property-level evidence. The modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.16%, and inland flood is the dominant hazard, but the model cannot establish a parcel’s flood zone, elevation, drainage, insurance price, deductible, or coverage. Closed-sale comparables, lease comps, vacancy, turnover, operating expenses, capital needs, financing terms, and assessed-value history are not published. Those gaps prevent converting gross yield into net yield or cash flow and prevent using county migration and employment to validate a particular submarket. Next checks should focus on hazard and insurance records, signed lease evidence, full operating statements, and closed sales.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Comal County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
San Antonio city*1.5MNew Braunfels city*104.6KSchertz city*44.1KCanyon Lake CDP33.9KSelma city*11.5KFair Oaks Ranch city*10.7KBulverde city6.5KGarden Ridge city4.3K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

9 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    San Antonio cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    1,479,835
  2. 02
    New Braunfels cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    104,643
  3. 03
    Schertz cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    44,050
  4. 04
    Canyon Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    33,883
  5. 05
    Selma cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    11,503
  6. 06
    Fair Oaks Ranch cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    10,728
  7. 07
    Bulverde cityIncorporated place
    6,486
  8. 08
    Garden Ridge cityIncorporated place
    4,332
  9. 09
    Spring Branch cityIncorporated place
    243

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.156% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.13%

$4,833 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+2,818

9,799 in · 6,981 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$18,649

$103,470 arriving · $84,821 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.5%

256 of 3,926 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,995▲ 3.5% year over year
Median days on market73▲ 0.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced26.0%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 7.5% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in San Antonio, TX

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Comal County183,826$436k$1,5344.2%inland flooding
Bexar County2,067,341$257k$1,3896.5%inland flooding
Guadalupe County183,642$301k$1,7106.8%inland flooding
Medina County53,547$325k$1,5625.8%inland flooding
Wilson County52,781$408k$1,6644.9%inland flooding
Atascosa County51,008$249kn/an/ainland flooding
Kendall County48,567$593k$1,6183.3%inland flooding
Bandera County22,021$344kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Asking rent and MLS listing prices may differ from signed leases and closed-sale outcomes, weakening the gross-yield thesis.
  2. Inland-flood exposure may produce parcel-specific insurance, deductible, repair, or financing costs that the modeled loss ratio does not capture.
  3. County-level migration and QCEW employment may not represent the target submarket, while missing vacancy, operating, capital, and financing data could turn gross yield into weak cash flow.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

What rent measure is in the record?

It is median monthly market asking rent. HUD FMR is a two-bedroom payment standard, not a market-rent estimate.

What does FHFA add to the housing analysis?

FHFA supplies a repeat-transaction appreciation index, not a home value, and its annual observation should be kept separate from Zillow’s county observation.

What investor competition is documented?

The record measures investors through purchase mortgages to non-occupants as a share of total purchase mortgages; it does not establish all-cash activity or competition for a particular property.