Counties / Texas / Atascosa County

Atascosa County, TX

FIPS 48013 · population 51,008 · part of San Antonio, TX

$249k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$249k
▲ 1.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$1,061
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,098
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+45.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.9%FHFA HPI2025−1.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$175k
Surveyed gross rent$1,061
Rent burden 30%+46.0%
Median year built1993
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
12.6%vacant
19,214estimated housing units
Occupied tenure22.6% renter
owner 77.4%renter 22.6%
Structure mix59.3% single-family
Single-family 59.3%20+ units 1.0%Mobile home 35.4%Other 4.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs14,528▲ 1.2% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments936annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,244▲ 2.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities29.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.2%WEEKLY WAGE+2.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities29.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Atascosa County presents a valuation-and-liquidity tension for an investor. Zillow reports a $248,771 median home value, up 1.89% in 2026-06, while FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI fell 1.25% in 2025 but shows a 45.07% cumulative five-year gain. These are different vintages and methods, not a blended growth rate. The split, paired with softer MLS evidence, warrants caution for an investor whose return depends on appreciation; investigate property-level comps, rent, and flood exposure before treating the Zillow direction as investable.

02Housing economics

Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $1,098 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent, and cannot substitute for rent. The effective property-tax rate is 1.29%; it adds a recurring carrying cost, but the record does not publish insurance, maintenance, vacancy, financing, or flood costs. Price support cannot be tested against operating income until achievable rent and property-level carrying costs are documented.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s supplied 2026-06 MLS evidence is less supportive: median listing price fell 9.77% year over year, active listings increased 40.14%, median marketing time reached 80 days, and 35.16% of listings had price reductions. These are asking-market measures, not closed prices or proof of demand. Demand has some support: 204 more tax-return households moved in than out, and average AGI for in-movers exceeded out-movers by $4,379. QCEW records annual covered employment up 1.18%, and average weekly wage up 1.97%. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Investor mortgages represented 3.42% of 614 purchase mortgages, so the exit case should not assume investor-led competition.

04Risk & next checks

The dominant hazard is inland flood. The modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.09%, but that is not a property-specific insurance premium, claim estimate, or substitute for flood-zone, elevation, drainage, deductible, and coverage review. The record does not publish closed-sale comps, vacancy or lease-up, insurance quotes, financing terms, or resident employment. Those gaps prevent a defensible gross-yield, cash-flow, or exit-liquidity conclusion. Next checks should tie a specific property to comparable sales, achievable rent, tax history, flood documentation, and insurance.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Atascosa County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Pleasanton city11KJourdanton city4.4KPoteet city2.9KLytle city*2.5KCharlotte city1.5KLeming CDP681Christine town295
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Pleasanton cityIncorporated place
    11,011
  2. 02
    Jourdanton cityIncorporated place
    4,407
  3. 03
    Poteet cityIncorporated place
    2,910
  4. 04
    Lytle cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    2,492
  5. 05
    Charlotte cityIncorporated place
    1,466
  6. 06
    Leming CDPCensus-designated place
    681
  7. 07
    Christine townIncorporated place
    295

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.091% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.29%

$2,254 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+204

1,634 in · 1,430 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$4,379

$53,431 arriving · $49,052 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors3.4%

21 of 614 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings309▲ 40.1% year over year
Median days on market80▲ 26.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced35.2%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 9.8% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the San Antonio, TX page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in San Antonio, TX

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Atascosa County51,008$249kn/an/ainland flooding
Bexar County2,067,341$257k$1,3896.5%inland flooding
Comal County183,826$436k$1,5344.2%inland flooding
Guadalupe County183,642$301k$1,7106.8%inland flooding
Medina County53,547$325k$1,5625.8%inland flooding
Wilson County52,781$408k$1,6644.9%inland flooding
Kendall County48,567$593k$1,6183.3%inland flooding
Bandera County22,021$344kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished market rent and absent closed-sale comps could leave both yield and purchase basis unverified.
  2. Inland-flood exposure could produce property-level insurance, deductible, or coverage costs not captured by the modeled loss ratio.
  3. Expanding visible supply, longer marketing time, and price reductions could weaken resale liquidity despite positive migration and workplace employment.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be underwritten from this record?

No. Market rent is not published; HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market asking rent, so gross yield cannot be computed.

What does the MLS evidence establish about demand?

It shows visible supply and marketing behavior through active listings, marketing time, price reductions, and pending listings; it does not establish closed-sale prices or buyer demand by itself.

What flood diligence remains necessary?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, but the supplied modeled loss ratio is not a property-specific insurance or coverage result. Property-level flood and insurance details are not published.