Counties / Wisconsin / Iron County

Iron County, WI

FIPS 55051 · population 6,210 · outside every metro area

$215k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$215k
▲ 6.0% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$662
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+66.4%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.0%FHFA HPI2025+4.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$166k
Surveyed gross rent$662
Rent burden 30%+41.5%
Median year built1972
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
44.1%vacant
5,566estimated housing units
Occupied tenure11.5% renter
owner 88.5%renter 11.5%
Structure mix91.0% single-family
Single-family 91.0%20+ units 1.2%Mobile home 2.6%Other 5.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,614▼ 4.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments229annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$822▲ 5.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services21.9% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−4.3%WEEKLY WAGE+5.5%Education and health services21.9%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Iron County’s decision tension is price resilience against unproven property income and incomplete operating evidence. Buyers who need a defensible income case should be cautious; investigators who can verify rent, insurance, and parcel exposure have the relevant next work. Zillow’s June 2026 median home value was $215,248, up 6.03% year over year. FHFA’s separate 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 4.14%. These observations point in the same direction, but their methods and vintages differ and cannot be combined into one appreciation rate.

02Housing economics

Measured market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $973 is a payment standard, not asking rent, and cannot fill that gap. Carrying-cost review should include the reported 1.07% effective property-tax rate and $1,768 median annual property tax, without assuming they apply to any particular home. Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.08% of building value annually. That model is a risk indicator, not a parcel-specific insurance quote or a dollar loss calculation.

03Demand & competition

Tax-return migration provides a limited demand clue: the county had a net gain of 26 moving households, and average incoming AGI exceeded outgoing AGI by $21,581. That composition is not evidence of renter demand or durable buyer demand. Investor participation was six of 74 reported purchase mortgages, or 8.11%, indicating the reported purchase set was not dominated by non-occupant buyers. It does not identify cash buyers, investor strategies, owner-occupant financing, or the conditions of individual transactions.

04Risk & next checks

Labor evidence is the counterweight. In 2025, QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces declined 4.27%, while covered-worker average weekly wage rose 5.52%. Education and health services, the largest disclosed private supersector, had 269 covered jobs and represented 21.89% of total private covered employment; it does not describe the whole economy. QCEW is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Realtor.com listing price, active listings, days on market, price reductions, pending activity, closed-sale prices, and market rent are not published in this record, preventing an underwriting conclusion on visible supply, seller concessions, transaction pricing, or yield. Verify those items plus flood insurance and parcel conditions.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Iron County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Hurley city1.4KMontreal city909Mercer CDP365Pence CDP149Iron Belt CDP140Saxon CDP67
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

6 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Hurley cityIncorporated place
    1,354
  2. 02
    Montreal cityIncorporated place
    909
  3. 03
    Mercer CDPCensus-designated place
    365
  4. 04
    Pence CDPCensus-designated place
    149
  5. 05
    Iron Belt CDPCensus-designated place
    140
  6. 06
    Saxon CDPCensus-designated place
    67

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.084% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.07%

$1,768 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+26

180 in · 154 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$21,581

$74,133 arriving · $52,552 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.1%

6 of 74 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. No published market rent or listing-market data means price strength may not support a feasible yield or exit assumption.
  2. Inland-flood exposure and actual insurance or mitigation costs may differ from the county modeled loss ratio.
  3. The QCEW workplace-employment decline could coincide with weaker tenant and buyer depth than migration data suggests.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Measured market rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

Does the labor record measure resident employment or unemployment?

No. QCEW measures annual average covered employment at workplaces located in the county; it is not a resident-employment or unemployment series.

What does the record establish about investor buyer competition?

The reported purchase-mortgage data show that non-occupant investors did not dominate the recorded purchase set, but they do not identify cash buyers or individual buyer strategies.