Counties / Minnesota / Itasca County

Itasca County, MN

FIPS 27061 · population 45,275 · outside every metro area

$251k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$251k
▲ 0.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$988
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,074
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+51.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.6%FHFA HPI2025+5.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$225k
Surveyed gross rent$988
Rent burden 30%+58.1%
Median year built1979
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
27.8%vacant
25,679estimated housing units
Occupied tenure17.0% renter
owner 83.0%renter 17.0%
Structure mix82.8% single-family
Single-family 82.8%20+ units 4.7%Mobile home 7.6%Other 5.0%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs16,432▼ 1.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,339annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,095▲ 5.3% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services28.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.1%WEEKLY WAGE+5.3%Education and health services28.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Itasca County’s tension is a recent Zillow value change, FHFA appreciation from an earlier labeled period, and no published market rent; the record supports a price-history review but not income underwriting. Investigate deal-level rents, flood exposure and taxes before treating it as a cash-flow case; buyers needing demonstrated income support or resale liquidity should be cautious. Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $251,275, up 0.56% year over year. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 5.40% annually. It supports a historical price-direction reading, but is neither a home value nor a matching period or method.

02Housing economics

Market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate, and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 0.86%, with median annual tax of $1,945. These are recurring-cost inputs, not the assessment or bill for a specific home. Missing insurance, flood mitigation, utilities, repairs and financing prevent an all-in carrying-cost test.

03Demand & competition

At 2026-06, Realtor.com reported 156 active MLS listings and 16.53% price-reduced listings. They are visible asking-market supply and seller-concession evidence; its days-on-market and pending measures describe marketing time and listing status, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. In QCEW’s 2025 annual average, covered employment at county workplaces declined; Education and health services was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Net migration was 40 tax-return households, with incoming movers’ average AGI $14,132 above outgoing movers’. Investor mortgages were 4.62% of 498 purchases. Neither migration nor county workplace counts identifies submarket renter demand.

04Risk & next checks

The supplied climate model assigns a 0.13% expected annual building-value loss ratio, and inland flood is the dominant hazard. This county-level model is not a parcel loss estimate, directing diligence to flood-zone maps, elevation, prior losses, coverage availability and premiums. Obtain address-level rent comps and lease terms, tax assessments, insurance quotes, repair needs and closed-sale comps; without them, yield, all-in costs and exit liquidity remain untested. County aggregates cannot establish a town or neighborhood result.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Itasca County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Grand Rapids city11.2KCohasset city2.7KColeraine city2.2KKeewatin city1.2KNashwauk city926Deer River city889Marble city669Bovey city646
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

19 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Grand Rapids cityIncorporated place
    11,207
  2. 02
    Cohasset cityIncorporated place
    2,703
  3. 03
    Coleraine cityIncorporated place
    2,150
  4. 04
    Keewatin cityIncorporated place
    1,215
  5. 05
    Nashwauk cityIncorporated place
    926
  6. 06
    Deer River cityIncorporated place
    889
  7. 07
    Marble cityIncorporated place
    669
  8. 08
    Bovey cityIncorporated place
    646
  9. 09
    La Prairie cityIncorporated place
    592
  10. 10
    Taconite cityIncorporated place
    468
  11. 11
    Bigfork cityIncorporated place
    375
  12. 12
    Calumet cityIncorporated place
    279
Show 7 more places
  1. 13
    Warba cityIncorporated place
    146
  2. 14
    Ball Club CDPCensus-designated place
    127
  3. 15
    Squaw Lake cityIncorporated place
    104
  4. 16
    Inger CDPCensus-designated place
    88
  5. 17
    Effie cityIncorporated place
    77
  6. 18
    Zemple cityIncorporated place
    49
  7. 19
    Goodland CDPCensus-designated place
    24

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.133% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.86%

$1,945 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+40

892 in · 852 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$14,132

$74,462 arriving · $60,330 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.6%

23 of 498 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings156▲ 12.6% year over year
Median days on market35▼ 14.6% year over year
Listings price-reduced16.5%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 2.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Address-level rents and operating costs may not support the purchase price.
  2. Flood zone, prior loss history, insurance availability or premiums may diverge from the county-level model.
  3. County listing, employment and migration data may not translate into submarket transaction liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot substitute for market rent.

Do the Realtor.com figures establish closed-sale demand or sale prices?

No. They are MLS listing-market measures of asking prices, visible inventory, marketing time, pending status and price reductions.

What physical risk needs parcel-level review?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard. The supplied modeled loss ratio is county-level and does not estimate loss for a specific property.