Counties / Nebraska / Jefferson County

Jefferson County, NE

FIPS 31095 · population 7,161 · outside every metro area

$144k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$144k
▲ 0.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$662
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$961
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+61.7%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.2%FHFA HPI2025−0.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$130k
Surveyed gross rent$662
Rent burden 30%+39.2%
Median year built1955
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
14.8%vacant
3,679estimated housing units
Occupied tenure25.1% renter
owner 74.9%renter 25.1%
Structure mix83.9% single-family
Single-family 83.9%20+ units 6.5%Mobile home 1.3%Other 8.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs3,419▲ 1.4% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments279annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$958▲ 3.6% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing24.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.4%WEEKLY WAGE+3.6%Manufacturing24.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Jefferson County's tension is a nearly flat current price signal versus a sharply positive long-run index history, with no measured rent stream. An income-focused investor, or anyone relying on appreciation, should investigate before underwriting the $144,456 median home value. Zillow's 2026-06 observation is near-flat; FHFA's separate 2025 repeat-transaction HPI shows a -0.29% annual change and 61.74% cumulative change. FHFA is an appreciation index, not a home value, so its vintage and method should not be averaged with Zillow. The record supports diligence, not a settled growth thesis.

02Housing economics

Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. The $961 HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent, and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 1.46%. Without a lease or rent roll, vacancy, repairs, management, financing, insurance, and condition, the record cannot establish net cash flow or show rental support for the price.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. QCEW shows covered employment located in the county growing 1.42%; the covered-worker average weekly wage is $958, up 3.57%. Manufacturing is the largest disclosed private supersector at 24.62% of private covered jobs, so this does not describe the whole economy or resident employment. Tax-return movers show 134 in and 205 out, net -71. Average AGI was $54,918 for in-movers versus $39,878 for out-movers, a higher-income inflow but not proof of durable demand. Non-occupant purchases were 7.04% of 71 total purchases. Realtor.com MLS measures—active listings, days on market, price reductions, pending ratio, and median listing price—are not published, so visible supply and marketing-time competition cannot be assessed.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits center on inland flood, the dominant hazard. The modeled climate loss ratio is 0.21% of building value expected lost per year, not a property-specific insurance quote or dollar loss. Closed-sale prices, market rent, insurance, operating expenses, condition, and parcel-level flood status are missing. Next checks are a rent roll or comparable asking-rent set, property-specific flood and insurance review, and closed-sale data. Until then, liquidity, gross yield, and net cash flow remain unestablished.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Jefferson County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Fairbury city3.9KPlymouth village397Daykin village195Diller village179Endicott village151Jansen village123Harbine village65Steele City village62
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

9 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Fairbury cityIncorporated place
    3,888
  2. 02
    Plymouth villageIncorporated place
    397
  3. 03
    Daykin villageIncorporated place
    195
  4. 04
    Diller villageIncorporated place
    179
  5. 05
    Endicott villageIncorporated place
    151
  6. 06
    Jansen villageIncorporated place
    123
  7. 07
    Harbine villageIncorporated place
    65
  8. 08
    Steele City villageIncorporated place
    62
  9. 09
    Reynolds villageIncorporated place
    41

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.207% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.46%

$1,886 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-71

134 in · 205 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$15,040

$54,918 arriving · $39,878 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.0%

5 of 71 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Missing market rent and operating, financing, insurance, and condition data could eliminate the apparent income case
  2. Negative net migration and absent MLS supply and marketing-time evidence leave tenant and resale demand unverified
  3. Inland-flood exposure may bring property-specific insurance or repair burdens not captured by the modeled loss ratio
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published; the $961 two-bedroom FMR is a HUD payment standard, not market rent.

What does the labor evidence measure?

QCEW reports 3,419 annual average covered jobs located in the county, not resident employment. The average covered-worker wage is $958 per week, and Manufacturing is the largest disclosed private supersector.

How large is investor participation?

The record shows 5 investor purchases out of 71 total purchases, equal to 7.04%.