Counties / Texas / Jim Wells County

Jim Wells County, TX

FIPS 48249 · population 38,850 · outside every metro area

$137k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$137k
▼ 7.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$938
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+42.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−7.2%FHFA HPI2025+11.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$124k
Surveyed gross rent$938
Rent burden 30%+62.8%
Median year built1981
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
18.2%vacant
16,229estimated housing units
Occupied tenure31.6% renter
owner 68.5%renter 31.6%
Structure mix73.7% single-family
Single-family 73.7%20+ units 1.0%Mobile home 15.1%Other 10.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs14,611▼ 2.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments856annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$954▲ 3.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services35.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−2.7%WEEKLY WAGE+3.8%Education and health services35.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Jim Wells County has a decision tension: Zillow’s county value measure weakened while FHFA’s transaction index strengthened, and soft MLS listing conditions make neither a simple exit-value signal. In Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation, the median home value was $136,800, down 7.25% year over year. The FHFA 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 11.48%; it is an index rather than a home value, uses a different method and vintage, and cannot be blended with Zillow into one appreciation rate. This record calls for caution from underwriters dependent on a near-term value assumption.

02Housing economics

Income underwriting is the central gap. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed from the county value. The HUD FMR is $973 per month, but it is a payment standard rather than an estimate of asking rent and cannot substitute for rent in a yield calculation. Carrying costs have at least a county tax reference: the effective property-tax rate is 1.15%. Parcel assessments, exemptions, insurance, utilities, and maintenance are not published, preventing an all-in expense comparison with possible rent.

03Demand & competition

Employment and listings point to a measured demand-and-competition review rather than a demand conclusion. QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces fell 2.70%; Education and health services was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole county economy or resident labor market. Realtor.com active MLS listings rose 30.14%, and 19.15% of listings had price reductions. Those are visible asking-market supply and seller-concession measures, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. Net migration was negative by 73 tax-return households, while average income of inbound movers was $248 below that of outbound movers. Nonoccupants accounted for 15 of 250 purchase mortgages, a calculated 6% share, indicating identified investor participation but not control of buyer competition.

04Risk & next checks

Hurricane is the dominant hazard, alongside a modeled climate-loss ratio of 0.18% of building value expected annually. That county-level model does not establish parcel flood or wind exposure, actual insurance terms, or a property-specific loss. Closed-sale comparables, market rents, rent rolls, parcel condition, insurance quotes, and hazard-zone detail are not published. Their absence prevents a supported exit-price test, gross-yield calculation, and hazard-adjusted cash-flow underwriting.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Jim Wells County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Alice city17.7KSan Diego city*3.7KPremont city2.4KBen Bolt CDP2.2KRancho Alegre CDP1.3KOrange Grove city1.1KCoyote Acres CDP977Alice Acres CDP819
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

16 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Alice cityIncorporated place
    17,707
  2. 02
    San Diego cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    3,675
  3. 03
    Premont cityIncorporated place
    2,428
  4. 04
    Ben Bolt CDPCensus-designated place
    2,152
  5. 05
    Rancho Alegre CDPCensus-designated place
    1,337
  6. 06
    Orange Grove cityIncorporated place
    1,089
  7. 07
    Coyote Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    977
  8. 08
    Alice Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    819
  9. 09
    South La Paloma CDPCensus-designated place
    386
  10. 10
    K-Bar Ranch CDPCensus-designated place
    361
  11. 11
    Alfred CDPCensus-designated place
    227
  12. 12
    Westdale CDPCensus-designated place
    212
Show 4 more places
  1. 13
    Sandia CDPCensus-designated place
    206
  2. 14
    Owl Ranch CDPCensus-designated place
    148
  3. 15
    Amargosa CDPCensus-designated place
    60
  4. 16
    Loma Linda East CDP (Jim Wells County)Census place
    9

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardhurricane

0.183% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.15%

$1,426 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-73

808 in · 881 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$248

$48,760 arriving · $49,008 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.0%

15 of 250 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings143▲ 30.1% year over year
Median days on market107▲ 26.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced19.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 6.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. County medians and indexes may not represent a specific neighborhood, property condition, or parcel.
  2. Unpublished market rents and property-level insurance costs could change income and carrying-cost results.
  3. MLS listing measures and FHFA index movements are not transaction-specific evidence of a realizable exit price.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

Does the record establish a single county price trend?

No. Zillow’s county-value measure and FHFA’s repeat-transaction index move in different directions and have different supplied periods and methods.

What hazard evidence is supplied?

The record identifies hurricane as the dominant hazard and supplies a county-level modeled climate-loss ratio, not parcel-specific exposure or insurance terms.