Counties / Utah / Kane County

Kane County, UT

FIPS 49025 · population 8,170 · outside every metro area

$435k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$435k
▲ 3.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$1,072
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,660
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+51.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+3.2%FHFA HPI2025+2.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$411k
Surveyed gross rent$1,072
Rent burden 30%+35.5%
Median year built1994
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
46.2%vacant
6,422estimated housing units
Occupied tenure19.6% renter
owner 80.4%renter 19.6%
Structure mix85.3% single-family
Single-family 85.3%20+ units 0.1%Mobile home 9.4%Other 5.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs4,205▲ 3.5% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments441annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$877▲ 3.9% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorLeisure and hospitality41.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+3.5%WEEKLY WAGE+3.9%Leisure and hospitality41.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Kane County presents an appreciation signal alongside a visibly softer listing market, so resale-dependent investors should be cautious while buyers able to verify property-level cash flow should investigate. Zillow’s county median home value was $434,803, up 3.22% year over year. Separately, FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.80% annually and 51.61% over five years; it corroborates direction but is not a home value and cannot be blended with Zillow’s different vintage and method.

02Housing economics

Cash-flow underwriting remains unresolved: county market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be calculated. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,660 per month, a payment standard rather than market rent, and must not substitute. Carrying costs include a 0.40% effective property-tax rate, but parcel assessments, insurance and flood premiums are not published in this record. Those omissions prevent a net operating income or expense conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS listing-market evidence adds friction rather than a sale-price verdict: median listing price declined 5.56% year over year, active listings increased 19.52%, and median days on market reached 88. Price reductions affected 17.08% of listings and the pending-to-active ratio was 7.97%, each describing listings rather than completed demand. Tax-return migration recorded a net inflow and higher average AGI for entrants than leavers, but it does not establish tenant demand. Non-occupants accounted for 16 of 156 purchase mortgages, or 10.26%; that is identifiable buyer competition, not evidence of rents or pricing power.

04Risk & next checks

Modeled climate loss is 0.12% of building value per year, with inland flood the dominant hazard; it is a modeled county-level exposure, not a property-specific loss estimate. QCEW describes annual covered jobs at county workplaces—not resident employment, unemployment or a forecast—and identifies Leisure and hospitality as the largest disclosed private supersector. Next checks are property-level flood-zone and insurance quotes, actual asking and achieved rents, operating costs, and closed-sale comparables; without them, cash flow, resale value and hazard-cost conclusions remain untested.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Kane County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Kanab city5.1KOrderville town803Big Water town502Glendale town493Alton town260
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

5 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Kanab cityIncorporated place
    5,081
  2. 02
    Orderville townIncorporated place
    803
  3. 03
    Big Water townIncorporated place
    502
  4. 04
    Glendale townIncorporated place
    493
  5. 05
    Alton townIncorporated place
    260

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.117% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.40%

$1,630 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+47

330 in · 283 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,533

$72,300 arriving · $62,767 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors10.3%

16 of 156 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings251▲ 19.5% year over year
Median days on market88▲ 26.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 5.6% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Closed-sale prices and transaction volume are absent, so MLS asking-price softness may not describe realizable exit values.
  2. County-level modeled flood exposure can diverge from a parcel’s flood zone, insurance terms and mitigation needs.
  3. Market rent and operating-cost data are absent, so tenant revenue and expenses may invalidate property-level economics.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. County market rent is not published, and HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

How much non-occupant buyer participation is reported?

Non-occupants accounted for 16 of 156 purchase mortgages, or 10.26%.

What does the climate-loss figure represent?

It is a modeled annual share of building value expected lost, with inland flood identified as the dominant hazard; it is not a property-specific loss estimate.