Counties / Nebraska / Knox County

Knox County, NE

FIPS 31107 · population 8,363 · outside every metro area

$216k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$216k
▲ 6.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$647
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$961
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+43.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.4%FHFA HPI2025+3.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$128k
Surveyed gross rent$647
Rent burden 30%+37.1%
Median year built1967
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
24.3%vacant
4,521estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.6% renter
owner 78.4%renter 21.6%
Structure mix86.3% single-family
Single-family 86.3%20+ units 0.8%Mobile home 8.3%Other 4.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,900▲ 0.2% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments331annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$871▲ 5.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities28.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.2%WEEKLY WAGE+5.4%Trade, transportation, and utilities28.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Knox County’s decision tension is a rising value signal in a small market against unverified rental income and more tax-return movers leaving than arriving. The Zillow county median home value was $216,318 in 2026-06, up 6.44% year over year, while the FHFA repeat-transaction HPI for 2025 rose 3.32% and was 43.94% higher over five years. Those observations have different methods and labeled periods, so they support positive direction but cannot be combined into one appreciation rate. Investors needing verified operating income should be cautious; asset-level investigators should test whether county-level movement holds for a particular property.

02Housing economics

Rental economics are unproved: market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $961 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market asking rent, and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 1.15%, and median annual tax is $1,472. Both are carrying-cost inputs, not a subject-home tax bill. Underwriting still needs an actual rent schedule, parcel tax record, insurance quote, and operating-cost history.

03Demand & competition

Labor and buyer evidence is mixed. QCEW covered workplace employment changed only 0.17% in its annual county record; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Tax-return migration had more households leaving than entering, although incoming movers averaged $58,254 of AGI versus $40,497 for outgoing movers. Investors held 23.53% of purchase mortgages across 34 purchases, a visible competitor group but a thin transaction base for inferring broad buyer demand.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual climate loss equals 0.17% of building value; that model is not a parcel loss estimate. Realtor.com MLS listing-market figures are not published, preventing conclusions about visible supply, marketing time, or seller price reductions. Next checks are property-level flood exposure and insurance, closed-sale comparables, leases and market rents, and title and condition review; without them, neither income coverage nor exit liquidity is established.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Knox County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Creighton city1.2KBloomfield city959Crofton city902Wausa village698Verdigre village613Niobrara village353Santee village235Center village191
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

12 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Creighton cityIncorporated place
    1,222
  2. 02
    Bloomfield cityIncorporated place
    959
  3. 03
    Crofton cityIncorporated place
    902
  4. 04
    Wausa villageIncorporated place
    698
  5. 05
    Verdigre villageIncorporated place
    613
  6. 06
    Niobrara villageIncorporated place
    353
  7. 07
    Santee villageIncorporated place
    235
  8. 08
    Center villageIncorporated place
    191
  9. 09
    Winnetoon villageIncorporated place
    68
  10. 10
    Verdel villageIncorporated place
    33
  11. 11
    Bazile Mills villageIncorporated place
    11
  12. 12
    Lindy CDPCensus-designated place
    9

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.175% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.15%

$1,472 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-19

130 in · 149 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$17,757

$58,254 arriving · $40,497 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors23.5%

8 of 34 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Parcel flood exposure and insurance cost may differ materially from the county modeled loss.
  2. Unpublished market rents and listing data may overturn income or liquidity assumptions.
  3. The small purchase count and investor presence may not represent the next buyer pool.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Published market rent is absent, and HUD FMR cannot be substituted for market rent.

Does the record support a listing-market liquidity conclusion?

No. Active listing, marketing-time, and price-reduction figures are not published.

What hazard requires property-level review?

Inland flood. The supplied climate-loss measure is modeled county-level evidence, not a parcel-specific loss estimate.